Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What makes the Blues and Hurricanes ‘benchmark’ Super Rugby teams

Peter Lakai of the Hurricanes scores a try during the round 12 Super Rugby Pacific match between Blues and Hurricanes at Eden Park, on May 11, 2024, in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Former Wallaby Morgan Turinui believes the Blues will go on to win Super Rugby Pacific this season after they overcame the Hurricanes 31-27 on Saturday in a potential preview of what “we’ll see in the final.”

ADVERTISEMENT

With the top two teams in the competition going head-to-head deep into the regular season, whoever won would not only sit in first place but would go a long way to securing home-field advantage through the playoffs.

The Blues, who had their home crowd cheering them on at Auckland’s Eden Park, shot out of the blocks with Bryce Heem scoring inside the first five minutes to cap off what had been a dominant start from the hosts.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But the Hurricanes hit back through Brad Shields shortly after which set the tone for the enthralling battle. Both teams scored two tries each in both halves with the difference in the end being Harry Plummer’s accuracy off the goal-kicking tee.

The men from the nation’s capital had a chance to steal it at the death but replacement halfback Sam Nock was the hero for the Blues who held on for a four-point win. They’re now first on the ladder with only three games left before finals.

“You don’t say ‘Test match’ … but it was a benchmark Super Rugby match. It’s probably what we’ll see in the final I would’ve thought,” Turinui said on Stan Sports’ Between Two Posts.

“The Canes could have, possibly will think should have won that.

“Look at the quality across the park that played well.

“If you’re any other team in the competition, the other 10 teams even including the Chiefs and the Brumbies, you’re thinking well that’s a level we’re gonna have to get to if we’re going to trouble them.”

Match Summary

1
Penalty Goals
1
4
Tries
4
4
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
159
Carries
113
4
Line Breaks
5
9
Turnovers Lost
16
5
Turnovers Won
3

ADVERTISEMENT

There seems to be a bit of daylight between the quartet of the Blues, Hurricanes, ACT Brumbies and Chiefs, and then the rest of the competition, on the back of the stellar work within the forwards.

Not only are their set pieces sound but all four of those teams are scoring tight-range tries. Players are burrowing over from the breakdown to cross for decisive scores week after week.

Panellist Stephen Hoiles, who played for the Wallabies and won a Super Rugby title with the Waratahs, explained in-depth for about a minute the importance of this “precision.”

Then, Turinui echoed those remarks by adding what these top “teams do for 80 minutes” that makes them such a force to be reckoned with in Super Rugby Pacific.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The detail in the game from both of these teams,” Turinui began to explain. “Everyone’s got their three-man shape with their forward runners, (but) their runners are able to either find a weak shoulder or space but also get to fourth or fifth defender.

“If you’re the first forward and you’re opposite the third defender and you step in because of pressure, you’re not doing anything for your team. It’s just another phase – you don’t make the defenders move at all.

“Their deep clan, so a clean that goes maybe that legal metre past which makes it harder to fold.

“Their work at the attacking breakdown to cut a corner, not run around the tackle contest and not come in from directly behind… all those little things and the breakdown have never bn more important in Super Rugby.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search