Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What Rassie Erasmus said on refereeing in Springboks loss to Ireland

Dejected South Africa players Faf de Klerk and Malcolm Marx leave the pitch in Durban (Photo by Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Rassie Erasmus has shared his thoughts on how Saturday’s 24-25 defeat for the Springboks in Durban was handled by the team of officials led by referee Karl Dickson. Trailing 6-16 at the break, South Africa roared back in the second half to take a 24-19 lead on 65 minutes after Handre Pollard successfully kicked his eighth penalty off the tee.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, instead of progressing from there to take the win and seal a 2-0 Test series victory, Ciaran Frawley struck two drop goals to dramatically tip the result in Ireland’s favour and leave the series ending in a 1-1 draw.

“You can sit here with a sad face and think out excuses but the best team won on the day,” volunteered Erasmus, who now has recently retired ref Jaco Peyper working as part of the Springboks backroom staff.

Video Spacer

Springbok captain Siya Kolisi on his team’s performance in teh second Test against Ireland

The Springbok players were not on the same page during Saturday’s series decider against Ireland in Durban.

Video Spacer

Springbok captain Siya Kolisi on his team’s performance in teh second Test against Ireland

The Springbok players were not on the same page during Saturday’s series decider against Ireland in Durban.

“I thought the referee [Dickson] was good. I think the area we thought they [Ireland] would come at us was the breakdown, he refereed that well. I think he refereed the scrums well.

“I just think Ireland, really at the end when it mattered, we fought back from a long way at half-time and we really converted when we had to but just that last minute, they did better than us.

Set Plays

6
Scrums
9
100%
Scrum Win %
56%
17
Lineout
9
82%
Lineout Win %
89%
9
Restarts Received
6
100%
Restarts Received Win %
100%

“Obviously we’d love to be 2-0, now it’s a drawn series. Between us and them it’s always two, three points and it’s always very tight. They definitely was in the mood of, ‘Listen, this is the last game of our season, after this we have got five weeks’ break’.

“The way they came out firing, we expected that but they really, really were good in that first half. At the end, it was a really good drop goal, well executed and we couldn’t stop that. I thought we did fight back very well second half but it wasn’t good enough and that is why Ireland is one of the top teams in the world.”

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa failed to score a single try in the match, the attack missing the delicacy of veteran Willie le Roux at full-back as he was concussed in the second minute and replaced by rookie Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu.

“When Willie is there our attack functions a bit better. Sascha definitely brings something different to the game, which is individual brilliance… he certainly didn’t look out of his place only playing his third game.

“Willie’s vision and feel for the game, he is maybe not the youngest and the fastest anymore but he is definitely somebody who links the two wings and the centres very well with each other.

“It’s sad to lose, not nice, and I know as we are disappointed. A lot of the fans will be disappointed as well. I wouldn’t say positives but I will say the experience that Sascha felt against a team which is really well organised and is ranked in the top one, two always in the world the last couple of years, he will take that and will use that going forward.”

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa’s maul is usually a potent attacking weapon but they steered away from it in the first half after Joe McCarthy engineered a crucial stop and they instead allowed Pollard to kick at the poles with their penalties rather than to the corner in the hope of driving their way over.

“Our lineout maul, we don’t want to maul against Ireland because Ireland are very technical at the mauls and (James) Ryan has a very unique way of stopping mauls. Not a lot of teams get a lot of results from mauling, so mauling wasn’t in the plan of our game.

“When coaching against Paul O’Connell you are always under pressure there. I thought our options from the lineouts could have been better, our attacking from the lineout could have been better. It was a quality team that put pressure on us… but it wasn’t the main concern of the game. The main concern was that first half.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

27 Comments
R
Roger 158 days ago

I don't know why people are trying to pick a fight out of Kolbe and Doris. Neither was doing anything wrong. Kolbe attempted to charge it down and in my opinion he slipped before he got to Doris. I don't think there was anything deliberate about it, honestly I thought he had slipped when I first saw the footage live. Then people complained Doris blocked him and then a fight broke out about everything.
I was kinda hoping the Drop-goal would be overturned because I am Springbok all the way. But when I saw the footage I knew they would be seriously stretching themselves to overturn that one. Kolbe was nowhere near the kicker, and he hadn't run into Doris, he had slipped. So Well done Ireland, they did have our number that day.

S
Stephen 159 days ago

The first drop goal by Frauley was illegal it was a direct kick the ball did not bounce off the ground see 69.4 minutes

C
Christopher 159 days ago

Bok supporter here. It was a brilliant game and I'm kinda happy the series was drawn. It keeps the rivalry growing, and rugby always wins when there are strong rivalries. Well done Ireland. To play a game like that given all the cards stacked against you (location, injuries, loss the previous week, etc…) was seriously impressive.

R
Robert 160 days ago

As a dedicated bok supporting japie I think that what the entire island of Ireland have brought to the world of rugby especially in the last decade should be given a standing ovation. I have a nagging feeling that they played the better rugby these last 2 tests they attacked well broke through our first line of defence many times with short inside passes and defended even better. Maybe Rassie needs to take another learning tour over there or maybe it’s time to bring back Nienies with all he’s learned since the WC. We need to work on these expansive tactics a lot more we couldn’t even score 1 try ffs. Having said that we’re still a bit disjointed but will improve with game time and oil on the springs. What a fantastic tour from the emerald warriors such a pity there wasn’t a decider but my blood pressure couldn’t take it.

J
John 160 days ago

National feelings aside, I think we’ve been very lucky starting w the matches leading to the 2023 RWC (Six Nations + prep games) as Ireland, South Africa, France, and later New Zealand emerged as four very good sides. Parity and games that are close / interesting are good for the sport. England is getting better as well. Think about it - exciting RWC, good Investec Cup final, good URC final and good EPL? final. It’s been a treat for the fans…who aren’t Welsh….or Aussie

D
Dan 160 days ago

I’m sure he was livid that Dickson didn’t follow in the footsteps of Barnes, Whitehouse and Pearce and hand them yet another undeserved victory.

Apparently didn’t get the fat envelope of unmarked sterling in on time this week

T
Toaster 160 days ago

Amazing. A saffa not complaining about the ref! 😃

Jokes aside good comments from Rassie
It was a furious match like the ABs England match and both refs should be very pleased at how they handled it

Only one try but it edged the ABs match as the game of the round for me

J
John 160 days ago

No need for panic - just look at the data and game film and make some choices…You can’t be a bok forever. Scrumhalf needs better depth / decision-making. Pick a 8-man, no make it two. Have Willie develop 2 successors…Willemse and someone else to create plays

On the scrums 1st bok pack looked more dominant - I think part of that is Bongi

G
Ginina 161 days ago

Big mess up, Bongi and Feinburg, why them 2 need to find another sport, them team you had for the first test you should have kept in order to have won the 2nd test. Come on coach, did you not see this coning you should have kept the same team you messed up really! Number 2, 21 and 1 retire not for you. Highly disappointing game. Champs to be beaten by small town players. Hooe this is not the end of the springboks, Hope you rethink the team especially if you going up against. NZ, France, Australia and Wales this will be a complete disaster for the springboks, choose your team wisely. Canan Moody where is he, he was really amazing, Damien Willimse where arw these guys. Kolise you rock! Fafe amazing, these rest of the team as well keep up the amazing team work you guys make it worth while to watching. 2nd test was a disaster honestly. 1, 2 and 21 keep them off the field.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 35 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search