Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'What the hell did that achieve?': Justin Marshall shreds All Blacks selections

Shaun Stevenson with ball in hand for the All Blacks. Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images

The conclusion of the Bledisloe Cup leaves the All Blacks with just one match before the Rugby World Cup and five Tests before the knockout stages commence. Former All Black Justin Marshall is hoping coach Ian Foster manages selections for those five games better than he did in the Bledisloe Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

The World Cup brings nations of varying rugby pedigrees together, inevitably leading to some skewed results in the pool stages before the eventual heavy-hitting centrepiece.

Typically, tier-one nations in strong from heading into the tournament have the luxury of resting players against lesser tier-two or three opposition, with a win considered a given regardless.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The All Blacks open their World Cup campaign against the tournament hosts, France. After that, they play Namibia, Italy and finally Uruguay.

Namibia and Uruguay both fall outside the tier-one nations list and historically have been the kind of opposition the All Blacks would rest their top talent against, but Marshall says that may not be in New Zealand’s best interests.

“I do feel that we need to continue to keep trucking these players out there that are going to be the team that play that quarterfinal,” Marshall told The Platform.

“You know that side just need to, again they just need to galvanize, they need to be really assured of the game plan. They need to be confident and chopping and changing, I don’t think helps that at all.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Honestly, they gave Shaun Stevenson a Test match and they gave Samipeni Finau a Test match and they are now All Blacks but they’re not even the Rugby World Cup squad. What the hell did that achieve? Honestly.

“So, I’m a bit lost as to why they did what they did at the weekend.

“I still feel very adamant, if they’re still going to give players game time they feel that they need it, they should know enough about them now if they’re in a World Cup squad.

“Give them the time off the bench, but let that team create its own rhythm and synergy and let them go through. Look at the end of the day it’s seven Test matches to win a Rugby World Cup. Now that’s not a hard ask for the modern player. Super Rugby teams do it, the second half of the season. They just truck the players out there.

“So my mindset is no, I wouldn’t like to see them completely change the team during the course of Rugby World Cup just to give players a run. Run them off the beach.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Opportunity vs continuity has been a chunky talking point over the past year for Ian Foster, the coach expressed his intent to name the same unit as much as injury would allow during the 2022 Rugby Championship and maintained a similar philosophy during the 2023 tournament.

Although, the preferred XV has changed a fair amount in that time. Aaron Smith and Rieko Ioane are the only players who have retained their position in the backline since last year’s Ireland series while in the forwards, the preferred props have changed, Scott Barrett looks to have taken Sam Whitelock’s place at lock and Shannon Frizell has locked up the vacated No 6 jersey.

As Marshall would go on to point out, that amount of change is a far cry from the recipe for success that Sir Steve Hansen and Sir Graham Henry enjoyed in their 2011 and 2015 World Cup-winning campaigns, when iconic combinations created a foundation for bolters to feed off.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
r
rod 499 days ago

Will Jordan is the difference between both players, has the potential to be the star of the World Cup. And maybe a World Cup winner also injuries could see Finau included in the team

J
Jack 500 days ago

I disagree with Marshall. Starting folks not planned to be in the 33 is critical prior to a World Cup. Remember 2011? Aaron Cruden started a RC match against the Boks and when Carter, then Slade went down, Cruden played well in the WC, in part due to that experience. (When Cruden went down, Donald was already experienced.) Finau is now blooded so there won't be much angst if one of the 5 loosies goes down and he's brought in.

C
Chris 500 days ago

Expect panicky changes in the knockout rounds as Fozzie gets flustered.
In which case the wild rotations of players may have perverse logic.
They have adopted the Irish game plan which may give them some grinding victories
Look elsewhere for entertainment

J
Jon 501 days ago

You have to agree with Marshall on this one. They obviously weren't going to be in the WRC Squad, Foster basically said he had settled on it, as was proved by both Finau and Stevenson having done all they could in the one chance they were given and still not being selected.

While they needed someone to play on the right wing, with Narawa injured and Jordan being fullback cover, someone else could indeed have done with more minutes at 6. Perhaps if Lord was fit that might have been Vaa'i, but it's hard to believe it.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search