Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What the Wallabies must fix or risk getting mauled in The Rugby Championship

(Photos by Morgan Hancock/Getty Images/Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

The Wallabies have claimed their first piece of silverware under Joe Schmidt, hoisting the James Bevan trophy after a series win against Wales, all things are going according to plan on paper.

ADVERTISEMENT

Getting down into the detail however paints a different picture, the Wallabies have been good without being great and have had success in areas where they have recently struggled.

While discipline, the breakdown, and defence have seen improvements, the two wins paint over the cracks which have appeared at maul time.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But rest assured, Schmidt and his staff are acutely aware of the shortcomings, knowing they must get more out of this group.

“I’m relieved, I’ll definitely say that I’m relieved… but boy are we going to have to be better than that,” Schmidt said in post-match commentary with Stan.

The forwards can be credited with a lot of the success in the first two Tests of the year, but it is also the area where the issues start for the Wallabies.

The defensive maul is partially responsible for the close margin on the weekend and could have been a deciding factor the week before had the Welsh not infringed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Set Plays

5
Scrums
4
100%
Scrum Win %
75%
11
Lineout
12
82%
Lineout Win %
75%
9
Restarts Received
6
100%
Restarts Received Win %
100%

At halftime on Saturday night, scrum coach Mike Cron didn’t hold back on what needed to happen at maul time, as the Wallabies struggled to contain the Welsh, conceding two maul tries within 10 minutes.

“Wee bit technical and a bit more bloody attitude so we will see what happens,” Cron said.

Maul defence is equal parts technique and strategy, as it is raw muscle, this unfortunately means as the squad works on the former, changes must be rung to ensure the latter.

It may seem like a harsh assessment, but the maul defence crumbled against a Welsh pack which is not nearly as strong as that of the Springboks, whom the Wallabies will face in less than a months’ time.

Maul defence is a fluid exercise, it requires zeal, skill, and fluidity in shape to be able to staunch and then steal momentum.

ADVERTISEMENT

There are three distinct stages to a maul defence, first the initial movement of the opposition’s maul must be stopped, most teams use the horseshoe set-up to contain and stop teams.

The set-up creates a cohesive unit, which can bind together and get lower than the opposition to stop the maul dead in its tracks.

The second part is counterintuitive; once momentum has been staunched the unit most transform into a group of individuals.

A select one or two players must swim through the centre of the maul, find the weak seams in the opponent’s set-up and get onto the ball carrier.

Thirdly, there must be a result, either sacking the maul or forcing early distribution, either neutralises the threat of the maul.

This is how a maul defence should operate, however Wales made life difficult for the Wallabies and the Aussies also made life difficult for themselves.

 

Wales maul try 1

The first thing to note is not a single Wallaby is standing tall and trying to reach over to grab the ball carrier.

By not doing this there is no one to sack the maul from the start, so whether by design or mistake, the Wallabies have just given up the initial opportunity to stop the maul to put all efforts into driving the Welsh back.

But brute force is not everything in a maul defence.

The second key thing to note is how low the Wallabies get; they get too low.

Initially the Wallaby forwards are almost propping-up the Welsh maul, preventing it from falling over itself.

The Welsh No 5, Dafydd Jenkins, comes down hard from the top of the lineout and appears as though he would’ve over balanced had a Wallaby grabbed him.

The Wallabies get an initial half a metre shunt on the Welsh, but that’s as good as it got for the Aussies.

Taniela Tupou, Australia’s strongest player is seen sprawled on the floor having latched onto the side instead of working back and taking point in the defence, that’s 140kg and a helluva lot of muscle missing from the now five-man maul.

It goes from bad to worse as Jeremy Williams and James Slipper skid-off the same right-hand side of the maul and the Welsh charge on.

The horseshoe has now been split in half and the Welsh roll to the right where Tupou, Slipper and Williams have all detached from, leaving Lukhan Salakai-Loto, Matt Faessler, and Charlie Cale flailing to get a grip on the charging Welsh.

The Aussies make a last gasp effort as Rob Valetini joins the fray along with the rejoining of Slipper, Faessler, Williams and Cale but it only halts momentum for a split-second before the Welsh roll over for a try.

The issue here is the horseshoe was never solid, it flexed and broke under the sustained pressure of the Welsh and after Tupou went skidding off the side on the right, the players on the left were too low to see what was going on, no one was calling the shots.

An incomplete, inaccurate and ineffective set-up lingered in the Wallabies maul throughout the game, the horseshoe was rarely sustained as the first line of defence and the Welsh often found a weak edge.

Maul penalty Wales G2

This clip exemplifies why getting too low in a defensive maul can be a problem.

Like a scrum, the players who lose their feet first are often the ones penalised, in this instance, Tupou is clearly the first to hit the deck.

Despite Tupou’s ill positioning and ineffective bracing, the set-up is better from the Wallabies, Salakai-Loto is standing tall and making a good effort to try to reach the ball carrier.

Nevertheless, Tupou gets penalised for collapsing and the Welsh get another lineout 20m out from the Wallaby’s line, which eventual leads to another try only a few minutes later.

Maul try two Wales G2

You would be excused for thinking it was the same clip as the first one, the set-up is identical, the Wallabies get very low without having a player standing ready to sack.

The horseshoe once again is incomplete as the Welsh begin to bustle forward and Fraser McReight stands off just a second too long.

The split second gives the Welsh the little piece of momentum they need to push-on for try number two.

The first man on the deck is once again Tupou, Williams and Slipper soon follow and then Cale comes spinning around, by now it’s all over.

This is a 14-point swing to the Welsh after the Wallabies had a 17-point lead, and all it took was three lineouts.

The identical pictures presented here show the defensive maul set-up is not working as it should, nor are the players executing as they should.

It also begs the question, having selected Cale who got the most lineout steals in Super Rugby Pacific 2024, why not throw him up to compete if your maul defence is on roller skates?

The lineout receiver is Jenkins for both tries, and he is only five centimetres taller than Cale, a gap Cale has closed in Brumbies’ colours this year.

Admittedly, the Wallabies competed and got pay out of it in the later stages of the game with Langi Gleeson, Williams and Cale all getting steals, but having Liam Wright back in the fold will help with lineout calling on both sides of the ball.

Aside from the strategy, it’s evident the Wallabies are missing some of their defensive maul specialists because not once did a player manage to get onto the Welsh ball carrier at the back.

Much of the pack are inexperienced in the dark arts of the maul and without Taniela Tupou providing his bulk to the shunt, the Wallabies pack was too light to hold back the Welsh wave.

No forward selected in the past two Tests is a known maul wrecker with the biggest exponents of the skill in Australia not yet selected.

Tom Hooper, Jed Holloway, and Darcy Swain domestically, with Will Skelton and Richie Arnold internationally are those who you would call if you needed a maul blown-up.

Hooper is the only player selected in Schmidt’s current squad and the international cavalry won’t arrive until the Rugby Championships, if at all.

Skelton is the ultimate maul demolisher, his inclusion in the squad in August could be defining for the Wallabies’ fortunes.

The locks currently selected in the squad are hard workers but are either sub-2m or inexperienced, maul defence at the highest level is a difficult skill to master.

Swain is the most logical choice to draft in, he has experience at swimming through and blowing-up oppositions’ mauls at Test-level.

Hooper and Williams are good prospects but appear better suited to the backrow at Test level.

Salakai-Loto and Frost could be a bulkier pair which should get a run at the weekend while the jury’s still out on Blyth.

August is a long time away for a Wallabies side which must overcome a tough Georgian side, who are coming off their first ever win against Japan.

Physicality will be the word when the Wallabies clash with the men who look like they’re made of granite and the Georgian’s maul and scrum will certainly test this young Wallabies pack.

The Wallabies are far from perfect and must work hard to quickly rectify the shortcomings of their maul, because otherwise The Rugby Championship could turn into a bloodbath.

Schmidt and his assistance have an opportunity against Georgia on Saturday to show they can change this group of players quickly, and the players will want to show Schmidt that they can make quick improvements.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
J
Jon 158 days ago

Nar this is too critical, looking for holes like a good salesman. Everyone knows you can’t defend a good maul.

Some things you can take out of it is the great Welsh example of how to maul and change points, Tupou’s technical issue on the bind, and like you say, reacting faster to everything on the field. That is probably the most important takeway imo, Wallabies have always got by by being smart footballers.

Enjoyed the piece, but like I told Nick, you really need positive stuff, examples to back yuo up if you’re going to try and get all nitty gritty. Because maul defences is an art, but you just pointed out a technical deficiency in the collective blind that would solve all these problems. Who jumps and defends in the same breadth this days Christ’s College?

P
Perthstayer 158 days ago

The whole Welsh scrum had 23 fewer caps than Slipper.
Maul defence is difficult to coach and Gatland knew that. Kudos to him for identifying weakness.

WBs need a Dewi Lake equivalent. Slipper's captaincy is one dimensional and uninspiring. A no guts no glory attitude will only help come the RC.

P
Pat 158 days ago

In all three examples TT is positioned as the first lifter at the front of the lineout and therefore joins the maul on the short side. In all examples the maul spins away from TT probably due to his immense strength. If the Wallabies had no intention of competing in the air, why not put TT as the second lifter (i.e. in the middle of the lineout)? Therefore all his power is being utilised through the centre of the maul. The maul will be much more unlikely to spin and TT will be much more unlikely to spin out the side. I.e. use TT as your rock in the centre of the maul and use your biggest second rower next to him to play the ‘swim through’ roll. It’s a very easy change that I think could pay big dividends for the Wallabies maul defence.

A
Adrian 158 days ago

Great analysis. I also think Ryan Smith was a massive factor in Reds offensive rolling maul… but most importantly he was central to a very effective maul defence. He’s the beast in the centre that peels through and harasses the carrier. A big engine and a worker. I would have loved to see him get some game time in these first 3 tests… one to watch in Reds v Wales. Skelton probably the notable overseas addition whose presence could amend these issues fairly quickly before Rugby Championships. A pack including Skelton, LSL, Liam W, Fraser & Bobby V has some serious grunt and grind. Smarts and braun. Add Toupou / AAA, Slips or Kaliea and there are some big hitters and carriers who can hurt people and bend the line. Things looking brighter down under.

j
john 158 days ago

Kiwi resident coaches select undersized second string Wallaby team, then throw said poorly coached Wallaby players under the bus, so it is never the kiwis fault.

Hmmm, how often have we heard this before. Like since Robbie Deans !

Australians aren’t interested in what some arrogant, know it all semi retired, part time coaches who live in the cold, miserable, fourth or fifth best rugby country in the world think.

Why would they ?

N
Nick 158 days ago

Nice breakdown of the maul john, very instructive. I would like to think LSL should be the one that is able to splinter the maul and feel like he has done so in the past, but its more a feeling than a sure thing. Taniela was vital in 2021 in stopping the springboks maul and was tasked with stopping them coming around the openside corner with rodda/philip in the middle. Agree, they should compete in the air given Wright and Cale’s stealing pedigree. To give credit to wales, I thought that first maul was very well built and they seemed to seesaw from the left to right, very hard to defend.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 46 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search