Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What Wales are potentially missing to be genuine World Cup contenders

Let’s get the platitudes out of the way from the off. Warren Gatland, to the surprise of no one, is Wales’ greatest coach, not just in the professional era, but any era. His achievements stand up to the closest of scrutiny. Three Grand Slams, a further Six Nations Championship, two Lions tours as head coach, where a Wales-heavy touring side earned a first Series win since 1997 over Australia, and a drawn Series in New Zealand point to a coaching tour de force.

ADVERTISEMENT

While Gatland’s squad are not loved worldwide for playing aesthetically-pleasing rugby, they are widely respected. Handre Pollard, the Springboks lynchpin summed up the uncomfortable nature of playing Wales when this writer spoke to him in the wake of South Africa’s 20-11 loss last November. “They are a tough bunch of men. They hold you up in contact if you go too high, or if you drive too low, they push you down and steal the ball. They are clever. They don’t play much rugby and kick a lot, but they get the points they need. If you want to beat Wales, you have to keep your discipline.” Succinct and to the point, read between the lines and Wales are a nightmare to play against.

To the bemusement of some, including Steve Hansen, Wales are currently the world’s No 1 side. Whether that matters or not is a moot point, but the fact remains, you simply can’t fluke 15 wins in 16 games. It tells you what an obdurate, stubborn, gutsy body of men Gatland has at his disposal.

When it comes to superlatives, short of renaming him Dai and tattooing Cymru Am Byth on his meaty forearms, Gatland is as close to an honorary Welshman as it’s possible to get, however, now Wales have their finest chance of lifting the Webb Ellis Cup since its inception in 1987, it is time to scrutinise areas of weakness, and reasons they may come up short.

Wales Rugby World Cup Kit – Continue reading below

Video Spacer

There are some factors already outside Wales’ control. Despite deepening Wales’ playing resources, the squad are now one-injury away from a crisis in certain positions. The long-term injury absence of Ellis Jenkins, the continuing hex afflicting Taulupe Faletau, right down to the innocuous, yet crushing ACL blow to Gareth Anscombe and nonsensical non-selection of Rhys Webb have all contrived to deprive Wales of some game-breaking talent at 7, 8, 9 and 10.

This could prove terminal to their aspirations but it’s that long-debated conundrum over the ability to create, chase a scoreboard and rustle up five pointers when the pressure is on that continues to rattle round as a problem area. Those beads of sweat most Wales fans awake to in the middle of the night are all too real. A free-scoring Fiji in Oita on October 9th is being dangled by some agent provocateurs as Nantes 2007; the remake.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wales, remember, were criticised for their inability to finish off the world’s elite in 2015. In both the Australia pool game, where the Wallabies were at one point down to 13-men and the South Africa quarter-final, where they had opportunities to cross the whitewash but spurned chances through imprecise passing, muddled thinking and, to their credit, brilliant defensive reads from the opposition.

Wales are a more refined and consistent squad than 2015. Their spine; Ken Owens, Alun Wyn Jones, Justin Tipuric, Dan Biggar, Jonathan Davies and Liam Williams boasts 461 caps of hard-worn experience. Warren Gatland will be entrusting them with Wales’ fortunes, and through the clever Anscombe, they had slowly moved from the muscular style of play where big ball carriers powered the corner and battered the opposing side into submission until a defensive chink was found.

While Wales still play a possession and territory game, through Anscombe they were able to play flatter to the line and mix-up their game-plan, but with ‘Chicken’ injured, and the lionesque Biggar in situ there’s a suspicion Wales could struggle to unpick the most uncharitable defences, leaving them with 180 minutes to give Jarrod Evans, the barrelling, jinking Cardiff Blues 10 or the gifted Rhys Patchell some valuable game time. If Wales, notoriously slow starters, are down by 14 points to an England or New Zealand in the knockout stages, do they have the tools to respond?

Hadleigh Parkes and Jonathan Davies are a pair of human molluscs in midfield; Parkes is able to truck it up out of defence, take short-balls to carry over the gainline, while Davies is a Rolls Royce of a centre, with a left-boot like a traction engine, a hammer-fend and astute reader of defensive channels, but they are not prolific try scorers, with 19 tries in 92 Test appearances between them. Both 31, they are shorn of the gallop to run in tries like Brian O’Driscoll in his Gabba pomp, or a hot-stepping Jonathan Joseph. With Owen Watkin ranked more on potential than accomplishments and Scott Williams working his way back to fitness, midfield x-factor is limited.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moving to the back three, strike-runners George North, Liam Williams and Josh Adams needn’t feel inferior to any unit in Northern Europe –  but it’s worth noting the Grand Slam champions trailed England 24 tries to 10 in the Six Nations. You are left with the nagging feeling Wales are still to replace the once-in-a-generation inventiveness of Shane Williams in the Welsh backline.

Does such a player exist, you may ask? It’s hard to know. For a season, the footwork and trickery of Steff Evans shone brightly and drew comparisons with Amman Valley’s special one, but his confidence has been dented with his defensive game picked-apart. With Leigh Halfpenny assured a place on the plane for his experience, bravery, defensive positioning and 80 percent-plus goal kicking ratio, but not his attacking brilliance, it’s a straight shoot-out between Hallam Amos and Owen Lane for the fifth back-three spot.

Amos is perhaps favourite for his versatility. He can operate at 15, outside centre or wing. For many, he stagnated in a Dragons squad that struggled woefully for results and his move to the Cardiff Blues, at 24, has been translated as long-awaited chance to take a step to the next level. Amos’ problem has also been his horrible luck with injury, so the next 160 minutes against Ireland is pivotal to his aspirations.

Lane is the bolter. Developed as a 13 in his formative years, at 21, he still has the top-end speed of a Test wing, and with 11 tries in his last 13 games for the Cardiff Blues, his form has demanded inclusion in the Wales squad. With a Sevens background, he has an appreciation of space and is a superlative finisher with his arcing finish against Lyon, where he rounded French wing Alexis Palisson majestically. A few pounds shy of 16st, he also has the power to bounce tacklers in the tramlines. He is not the finished product, with his defensive maturity questioned, so whether Japan has come too early for the Whitchurch-schooled flyer will soon be clear if facing the likes of Jacob Stockdale and Keith Earls.

Gatland is not averse to trusting in youth if it suits his modus operandi. He picked 19 year-old George North, 20-year-old Taulupe Faletau and 21-year-old Scott Williams in 2011, while in 2015, Tomas Francis and Gareth Anscombe had three-caps between them as 23 and 24-year-olds but time is running out for youngsters to impress their claims.

The next fortnight is an unfiltered audition for the few remaining squad members to gain the trust of Gatland and add the final piece of the jigsaw to Wales’ World Cup bid.

Wales may be back from Turkey, but the heat is on.

Rugby World Cup video – Fukuoka

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search