Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What we learnt from the women's game in 2021

Zoe Aldcroft of England celebrates after scoring a try with team mates during the Autumn International match between England and USA at Sixways Stadium on November 21, 2021 in Worcester, England. (Photo by Catherine Ivill - RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images )

It’s been a whirlwind year for women’s rugby, with some brilliant steps forward made in attendances, investment, and television coverage (mainly in England), but we can’t forget 2021 has also seen moments of inequality littered throughout, with players, supporters and management still asking for more.

ADVERTISEMENT

If we have learnt anything from this year, it’s been that England are unquestionably the dominant force in the world game. The squad contains World Rugby Player of the Year Zoe Aldcroft and nominee Poppy Cleall. Not to mention the team are currently on an 18 match winning streak and scored an embarrassingly high 99 points against the reigning world champions New Zealand during the recent Autumn Internationals.

World Rugby Coach of the Year Simon Middleton has been in charge of the side for almost seven years now and this consistency has paid off as referenced by Wales international Elinor Snowsill in her recent interview.

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

England are a side that look primed and prepped to win back the World Cup next year. They were crowned 2021 Six Nations champions and players know what their roles are in any given situation. Even debutants seem extremely comfortable in the Red Roses environment, also every position has a formidable back up option and with the sport’s pinnacle event on the horizon, they’re showing no signs of slowing down.

We also learnt that France isn’t far behind England (they also put a whopping 67 points on the Black Ferns this Autumn) and had two players nominated for World Player of the Year in Caroline Boujard and Laure Sansus.

After missing the mark so frequently against England in the 2021 Six Nations and last year’s Autumns, they’ll be like a dog with a bone at next year’s tournament and it’d be naïve to write them off to lift the World Cup trophy, or at least make the final.

And what do France and England have in common?

This is by no means new news, but if we needed any more evidence, this year proved that teams who receive significant investment from their unions, who take their women’s team seriously, and play regular Test matches, will thrive. Plus both countries have successful domestic leagues below them drip feeding ready-made international standard athletes into their national setups, it’s a recipe for success.

ADVERTISEMENT

What also speaks volumes is how a team’s success on the field can influence factors off the field. For example, the BBC showing all four of England’s Autumn International matches on terrestrial TV, opening the sport up to a new, more casual audience and recording one million viewers for the England v Canada match alone on BBC Two- talk about return on investment.

Add to that how the success of the Premier 15s and the standard of rugby also saw the BBC announce they will broadcast the league live for the first time, with a match shown each weekend on iPlayer and the BBC Sport website and app- build it and they will come, as they say.

For all their bad press earlier in the year and a dismal Six Nations campaign, the November Tests showed us that Wales are picking up, with promising wins over Japan and South Africa and the introduction of contracts appearing in the new year. Wales also finally seem to have nailed down a coach in Ioan Cunningham and fingers crossed he stays in place to offer the players some badly needed consistency and leadership.

Unfortunately, over this Irish sea the scene has not looked so promising. Despite recording recent wins over the USA and Japan, Ireland failed to qualify for the World Cup in September and the year has ended with 62 current and former players writing to their government expressing their loss of trust and faith in the IRFU and pointing out the union’s failing in governing the national women’s programme over a sustained period of time. Hopefully the result of this sees more transparency and long overdue change at the helm of Irish women’s rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

Finally, as mirrored by the men’s Autumn results, it seems the northern hemisphere teams are pushing ahead. For the men it’s mid-World Cup cycle but for the women this could prove significant as we are less than ten months away from the postponed tournament in October 2022.

As demonstrated by the Black Ferns returning home winless from their Northern tour, England and France are strides ahead, with the Springbok Women still playing catch up with the remainder of the European nations. The USA also saw a winless Autumn campaign with losses to Canada, Ireland and England.

It could be that regular Test match rugby in the form of the 2020 and 2021 Six Nations has kept the competing northern hemisphere nations afloat during the challenging times of the pandemic, whilst other teams without an annual international competition have struggled.

This has highlighted the fact that New Zealand’s Rugby Union need to buck up their ideas and organise more matches for their Black Ferns. Covid and geography aside, not playing a Test match is over two years is simply unacceptable, especially when the All Blacks managed to squeeze in 18 games in the same period, yes 18!

It doesn’t take a genius to realise that if you don’t challenge your world champions players with top quality opposition for a long period of time, other nations will overtake you. Hopefully, the introduction of Super Rugby Aupiki and the four teams competing in the competition this coming March, will provide the players some much needed Test match standard duals as regularly seen in the top half of the Premier 15s table.

With some teams looking to fine tune their winning formulas and others just starting out on new journeys or embarking on new eras, it’ll be exciting to see what the future brings on the pitch as we prepare for a jam-packed and promising 2022.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 31 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ian Foster: 'You kid yourself that we were robbed' Ian Foster: 'You kid yourself that we were robbed'
Search