Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What World Rugby make of the emerging nations at World Cup 2023

(Photo by Marcelo Hernandez/Getty Images)

Wednesday marked the 100 days to go milestone before the start of the 2023 Rugby World Cup in France and World Rugby CEO Alan Gilpin is excited that the minnow nations such as first-time participants Chile can make their mark at the tournament. There is often criticism regarding the overall level of competitiveness of the lower-ranked teams at the finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, recent editions have generated some eye-catching results. For instance, Japan ambushed South Africa in Brighton in 2015 while four years later in Kamaishi, Uruguay shocked Fiji.

Now, World Rugby are hopeful of witnessing further progress at France 2023 with Uruguay, Namibia, Tonga, Romania, Georgia, Portugal, Samoa and Chile the eight lowest-seeded teams in the 20-strong event.

Video Spacer

How referees and coaches are collaborating for the World Cup | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

How referees and coaches are collaborating for the World Cup | The Breakdown

“It is challenging,” began Gilpin regarding preparing the emerging nations to be at their best in September and October, “but we are providing enormous support, funding, supporting more competitive fixtures, longer preparation periods, longer preparation camps for these kinds of emerging nations, investing in the high-performance strength and conditioning staff supports.

“There are 100 or so of the coaching and high-performance staff across those emerging nations that are effectively directly employed by World Rugby, so we absolutely trying to do everything we can to make all of those nations as competitive as they can be because we all know a competitive and compelling tournament on the field is what is going to drive fan interest and get people really excited.

Related

“The challenge is the more and more we invest in making those emerging nations more competitive, we are trying to catch up with the ever-increasing investment that the so-called established nations are making, so it is a challenge.

“But we saw in 2019 reduced winning margins and we have seen it across the last few World Cups – and we are genuinely hopeful that we will see it again for 2023. We have got a new entrant in the tournament in Chile. We are excited to have three South American teams in a Rugby World Cup for the first time, so there are some great pointers to success.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Then there is the top end of the draw where never have there been so many contenders touted as potential Rugby World Cup winners. “As we have seen in the rankings, it has never been more competitive,” enthused Gilpin.

“On any given day there are six or seven teams there that could all beat each other. We have got more uncertainty around our world champions than ever before. That all leads to the excitement that we are seeing. We are genuinely anticipating the most competitive and compelling Rugby World Cup on the field to date.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search