1
Where Damian McKenzie is a better fit than Richie Mo'unga
By Ben Smith
Once upon a time, Damian McKenzie was New Zealand Rugby’s most elusive player.
ADVERTISEMENT
Since debuting for the Chiefs as a 20-year-old in 2015, McKenzie tore apart the competition and was constantly among the competition’s top five players for line breaks, defenders beaten and broken tackles.
He was an excitement machine who made big plays in a Dave Rennie-led Chiefs side that liked to run the ball from anywhere as skilled players like Aaron Cruden, James Lowe, Seta Tamanivalu and Anton Lienert-Brown gelled together in a high-scoring attack.
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The Video Cloud video was not found.
Error Code: VIDEO_CLOUD_ERR_VIDEO_NOT_FOUND
Session ID: 2025-04-25:793f95b51caabc46acab2791 Player Element ID: brightcove-embedded-video
There were calls for McKenzie to break into the All Blacks in those early years at the Chiefs, but it wasn’t until 2017 when he started regularly at fullback for New Zealand following injuries to Ben Smith and Jordie Barrett.
By 2018, the consensus was that McKenzie was the future All Blacks first-five, despite having mainly played at fullback throughout his brief professional career.
His schoolboy and age-grade days as a No 10 resulted in many earmarking him for a permanent positional shift at some point, although most recognised that, at the time, his talent was best utilised at the back.
That was reflected by New Zealand’s investment in building a 10-15 partnership between Beauden Barrett and McKenzie throughout 2017 and 2018.
ADVERTISEMENT
When Barrett was injured with concussion against France four years ago, McKenzie starred when he was handed his first test start at first-five against Les Bleus in Dunedin.
All of this took place without Richie Mo’unga really being in the picture, but pressure grew for his inclusion as the Crusaders racked up Super Rugby titles.
That was until their hand was forced following McKenzie’s ACL injury early in 2019. As a natural No 10, Mo’unga would play first-five and Barrett was moved to fullback.
It was worth a try, but it never panned out. Instead, the positional shakeup cost Barrett a World Cup campaign in his prime, with his ability illustrated by two two man-of-the-match performances against South Africa and Ireland.
ADVERTISEMENT
In hindsight, the Barrett-McKenzie partnership had better chemistry, working for both players despite the two being similar players in many aspects.
Both are criticised for a lack of game management skills, exploring too much with out-of-the-box decisions and unconventional running.
They push the high-risk pass often, putting their own side under pressure, and are naturally creative and dynamic runners of the ball.
However, at the end of the day, they produce points and try scoring opportunities.
Against England in 2018, it was McKenzie who scored the lone try from a Barrett inside ball, and he had three clean breaks whilst beating 11 defenders.
He was shaky under the high ball, but produced enough on attack to outweigh the negatives and finish with a huge net positive impact that proved decisive in overcoming a 15-0 deficit.
In the 2019 semi-final without McKenzie and with the Mo’unga-Barrett partnership against the same English side, the All Blacks would have been ‘nilled’ if not for an overthrow error scooped up by Ardie Savea.
They had essentially nothing in attack and could not get off defence.
Perhaps the most overlooked and undervalued discussion point in the Barrett-Mo’unga-McKenzie debate is their defensive ability, which is absolutely critical at test level.
Barrett does not even need to be brought up on this front as he has saved so many tries for the All Blacks. His tackles are a highlight reel in their own right.
As for the other two, McKenzie shines over Mo’unga in this area, and the difference is palpable at test level.
McKenzie has never been the biggest frame, but he is a much more consistent defender than Mo’unga. Perhaps that’s the result of putting your body on the line against bigger players in the open field while playing at fullback.
The All Blacks still have to hide Mo’unga on the field at times, as do the Crusaders. This is not to say he can’t tackle, his application is just less effective than McKenzie.
His defence in the line is often a target for opposition teams, which is the biggest detraction from his potential as an elite test player.
When the All Blacks lost to France last November, Les Bleus were able to manufacture one-on-ones against Mo’unga by running screens to distract his inside cover, and first-five Romain Ntamack beat him on the inside for a try.
McKenzie has never really had his defensive ability questioned as, time-and-time again, he has come up trumps against a much bigger man.
Outside of his defensive ineptitude at times, Mo’unga has struggled to show his playmaking class against elite test sides like the Springboks, England, France and Ireland.
His three biggest All Blacks performances have all come against the Wallabies – twice at Eden Park in 2019 and 2020, and then again in Sydney two years ago.
Mo’unga’s attacking prowess has failed to flourish against more threatening and powerful opposition, and the same can be said when Los Pumas famously bullied the All Blacks into submission two years ago.
For all the talk of the safety of his game management skills, he couldn’t stamp his authority and manage those matches.
It is never one player’s fault and Mo’unga can’t be blamed entirely, but the freewheeling style of Barrett and McKenzie can often produce plays that bail the side out when the side isn’t going so well.
Aside from those tests against the Wallabies, Mo’unga has not done that for the All Blacks against the world’s best.
In spite of all that, McKenzie’s All Blacks career has languished while Mo’unga’s continues, to the point where the Chiefs playmaker simply packed his bags and left for Japan at the end of last year.
Not on a contracted sabbatical signed off by New Zealand Rugby [NZR], but on a ‘see ya, talk later’ deal orchestrated on his own accord.
As it stands, McKenzie and Mo’unga are both 27-years-old with 40 and 32 tests each, respectively. The former has had the better test career so far, despite not having not featured as prominently since his injury return as he did between 2017 and 2018.
Since returning, McKenzie has been mucked around as a utility, filling in off the bench eight times and starting eight times.
At the backend of last year’s Rugby Championship, he was a bench substitute against South Africa twice, played in illogical positions as a centre and wing, and only got one start against Italy in Europe.
McKenzie is seemingly out of the picture completely for the Ireland series without a NZR deal in place. Mo’unga, meanwhile, is looking at a career-defining series to prove his test mettle, but it looks like Barrett is the number one first-five option again.
If Barrett is back as the number one first five, when looking at who should fill a potential bench spot, McKenzie is the obvious option over Mo’unga due to his versatility, stronger defence and unpredictable attacking traits.
Shane, are you sure your not Ritchie’s mum?? You’re defending the guy like only a mother would!!
Comparing Leicester and Dmac is pointless. Different type of players, different positions.
Mounga has been a complete failure at test level. He’s a flat track bully. It’s such a shame that Hansen and co pushed BB to 15 for him as it ruined 2 years of footy for BB.
No forward pack is going to have it all their own way when playing the top teams, ABs included. If Ritchie needs a dominant pack and rolls Royce mid field to play well then that confirms he shouldn’t be anywhere near a test team. The Blues and BB showed a couple weeks ago how limited he is.
When looking forward, I do not think the ABs will have the forward depth and dominance over the likes of England, France, Ireland, South Africa. We MAY get a decent midfield in the backs and we should have a good back three. So the question becomes, who is best at 10 with a average to good pack? Who can produce flashes of brilliance, speed, flair and quick decisions the best? These are the qualities the AB's will need. In my opinion, B. Barrett is the man. Second is MacKenzie and Mo'unga really doesn't have that as part of his package at all. We know that Barrett and MacKenzie formed good partnerships when they played FB and 1st 5. But Mo'unga and Barrett didn't really get up to speed in that regard. Mo'unga is a very , very good player behind a dominant pack and with backs who play with structure and against lessor opposition. Think .. all his best performances have been at Super Rugby level with occasional isolated good things at test level. In tests when things get very tough and the opposition are making a run for it, he sometimes just goes missing. I will say his defence has improved somewhat. You cannot say he is not safe, he is. He lacks flair and out of the box decisions that win games.
Mo’unga not shining at a test level is mostly caused by inadequate forwards and midfield. Mo’unga gets poor ball and doesn't have a midfield to play off.
B Barrett and McKenzie are unstructured players who can produce individual brilliance. Of the two B Barrett is significantly better than McKenzie. Why have two 10s that play the same style when you have other options?
When/if the All Blacks' forwards and midfield are sorted Mo’unga will be able to achieve his true potential. In NFL terms Mo’unga is more a system player who has a good, secondary, running game. If the system doesn't function there are no good passing targets. The All Blacks have relied on B Barrett's individual brilliance to make up for a poorly functioning team.
Damaian Mckenzie is a better fit in japan and should stay there 👍👍hes not going to win us a world cup fullstop richie us much better then twinkle toes run sideways,and richie has a better boot at goal,would like to Stephen perofeta given honours also if called upon