Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Where the Wallabies need to play marquee recruit Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii

Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii is pictured during an Australia Wallabies Training Session at the AIS on October 14, 2024 in Canberra, Australia. (Photo by Mark Nolan/Getty Images)

Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii has finally completed his long-awaited code swap to rugby, and he got straight into drills this week at a training camp in Canberra, at the invitation of Wallabies coach Joe Schmidt.

ADVERTISEMENT

Training in his new NSW Waratahs gear alongside his new teammates as well as Wallaby hopefuls from the ACT Brumbies, Suaalii struck an impressive figure, standing out from the other Wallaby backs.

At 196cm and 98kgs, he’s considerably taller than the other backs and is listed as being the second heaviest Wallaby back, only one kilo lighter than Dylan Pietsch.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Apart from the metrics, it’s clear to see the league convert is a large human, a trait which Australian rugby will welcome, considering most of the top-tier backs are just on the smaller side by comparison with other top tier Test sides.

Suaalii raw athleticism could make him a handful on the wing, his height works well at fullback and his abrasive nature has him well suited for the melee of the centres.

He himself has no qualms about where he’s put, at just 21-years-old, the young star says he’s ready for any challenge.

“I’m just keeping everything simple, just sticking to the process of training every day, getting better every day and just learning from my teammates and just trying to be as best player I can be,” he said at the Canberra press conference.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Look, I’ve always been open to playing centre, wing, fullback,” he said.

“If the coach puts me anywhere, I feel like I’m just a footy player at the end of the day. Any position, I’m ready to play. I don’t really have a preferred position.”

Related

Suaalii is embracing the challenge of learning the intricacies of rugby and that learning curve may just dictate where he should be played during his initial re-introduction to rugby.

There’s suggestions Schmidt sees the young gun as a no.13 or a fullback, two positions which at Test level require great game knowledge and experience, a coaching project that would take time.

Time, which Schmidt’s contract currently doesn’t contain.

Nevertheless, speculation is always entertaining and if he were to play inside centre for Schmidt, he’d have to play the role of the hardman with the aptitude to ball play.

ADVERTISEMENT

At outside centre, one is often charged with the defensive leadership of the team as well as being the link between the outside and inside backs, communication is key.

Out on the wings, spatial awareness, workrate, and an acute understanding of kick strategy will be required, as the Wallabies fight to improve their territorial control.

Finally, being the fullback, one requires even better game understanding, an ability to kick, chase, and catch the highballs, but above all else, vision and communication to the flyhalf is crucial.

There’s no doubt Suaalii has the size and power to ‘just play footy’ in any of these positions and cause his opposite a good bit of grief whilst doing it.

Nevertheless, he will likely have to prove his rugby intellect for Australia A first and foremost, during their two fixtures in England.

The first of the two matches will be against the Bristol Bears, a side which plays a fast and furious brand of rugby, who often run the ball from within their own 22m.

Next, the challenge will go up a notch against an England XV side, that will be the true test to see where the youngster’s physical ability scales.

He is expected to deal well with the physical nature of these games, albeit with a little more post-tackle competition and some much heavier bodies to shift at the ruck.

So where does he fit into an Australia A side, and subsequently where does he fit into a Wallabies side?

In all likelihood he will join the Wallabies camp after the two-game tour, where Schmidt will undoubtedly have an eye on the British and Irish Lions tour in less than a year’s time.

Suaalii’s height would be useful in the backfield, and while wing has the kindest learning curve, it’s perhaps at inside centre where he could find his first home.

The reality is, the youngster is yet to grow into his body, which is an exciting prospect.

At Super level and for Australia A, inside centre would be a good way to get him involved early in the phase count, and being the size that he is, he’d attract several defenders.

If he somehow gets a miraculous call-up to a Wallabies matchday-23, the intricacies of the attacks they’d be facing would be a step too far at no.12, so on the wing is likely where he would be best suited.

Whilst he’s only young now, recent revelations in the media show he could be in rugby until 2029, when he will be 26 years old, roughly the same age as current Wallaby centres Hunter Paisami and Len Ikitau.

Australia are flush for talented wingers, and have some strong contenders for fullback, but the stocks for inside centre are thin, and physically on the smaller side.

Related

Paisami alongside Ikitau have been Schmidt’s preferred combination, but after them the cohesion and physicality does drop off.

There are other inside centre options like David Feliuai, Lalakai Foketi, Hamish Stewart and when not injured, Isaac Henry but none have dethroned Paisami.

The reason for this focus on the no.12 jersey is because although Schmidt’s centre pairing is not tiny by any stretch, they are on the smaller side if compared to the centre combinations of the top 6 teams.

These teams’ most common centre combinations often boast one player who is a few kilos north of 100, with both usually measuring over 190cm.

Ireland’s most common combined centre pairing weight and height is 363cm and 197kgs, South Africa 375cm/204kgs, New Zealand 385cm/198kgs, France 371cm/209kgs, England 373cm/195kgs, and Argentina 378cm/192kgs.

You can bet the Lion’s centre pairing will be of the same ilk.

To put a raw figure to it, the Wallabies’ centre pairing unsurprisingly comes in at the smaller end at 359cm/194kgs.

While there are clearly some behemoth pairings like South Africa and France, it’s mostly the height factor where the Wallabies are outliers.

This may seem like a minor detail but having a larger and therefore more visible threat can sometimes mean the difference between a defender holding their shape or is pressured to break ranks.

Few inside centres hit as hard in defence as Paisami, at just 177cm he punches well above his height, but weight-wise, at 98kgs, he is perfectly within his own weight class against most of the inside centres in the world.

This is all to say, Australia needs a more imposing centre combination.

There’s no question that Paisami was the best performing no.12 during Super Rugby Pacific and rightfully has played the lion’s share of minutes at inside centre for the Wallabies.

As previously stated, it will be some time until Suaalii is ready for this role, nevertheless, it’s difficult to ignore his potential to mature into the no.12 jersey.

Being closer to the action at Super level could also perhaps fast-track his reintroduction to rugby.

The last thing anyone within the rugby ecosystem wants to see is him being underutilised and having to fight to get involved in games.

Many eyes will be on the young convert, luckily his debut game will abroad and away from the domestic media and therefore he will perhaps escape some scrutiny in his opening performances.

As he begins to reacquaint himself with the game of rugby it will become clear just how much he must learn and where he will fit in in Schmidt’s plans but there is no expectation that Suaalii will become a Wallaby in 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

14 Comments
P
Phillip 59 days ago

Imagine putting a bit of weight on him and putting him in the second row....

P
Perthstayer 60 days ago

This is one way in which good players lift other players. The backline has the shadow of the axe upon them, this will make them train harder than ever.

J
John 60 days ago

Good point Perthstayer

m
mJ 60 days ago

I thought in the Rugby Championship all our starting backs were second best, none performed well and all had at least one bad game and none had good games or imposed themselves. Our wing and fullback stocks are really poor. Wright has been ordinary and looks like a fish out of water. Both wings were really poor, centres had no impact and 9 and 10 can’t run the team or create. Rose tinted glasses to think we currently have any international quality backs starting for the Wallabies.

J
John 60 days ago

Ikitau was a beast in that first Argentina Test. Kellaway didn't play bad in the second, He also was pretty decent in that first Beldisloe.


I think wing is fine, it's just Schmidt is getting them very involved.

O
OJohn 60 days ago

That's because Schmidt won't play our best players

m
mJ 60 days ago

One thing I picked up on is he speaks well, is very confident and isn’t shy. I can see him quickly becoming the main voice and dominant figure in the Australian backline, one other thing we are really missing.

O
OJohn 60 days ago

Having him play anywhere other than on the wing or 15 will demonstrate Schmidt is simply continuing to try and sabotage the Wallabies.

We have world class players at 12 and 13 in Kerevi and Ikitau.

Why try and undermine the Wallabies by not using them ?

C
CR 61 days ago

They have a good 13 and 15, I would look at playing him at 12 or possibly wing to start with

F
Flatcoat 60 days ago

Wallabies need a 12..Paisami is to small and played poorly in his last test..

m
mg 61 days ago

Playing Roger Sheck at 12 was terrible, but I guess Sonny Bill worked out there. But is he an offloaded? Is a Jamie Robert's, doesn't as big, or is he a George North or Folau? How he sees the field is more important than his physical attributes. Does he create or exploit space?

J
John 60 days ago

Hey mg, I thin the comparison with RTS is a good one but yes as you highlight, he is more positionally aligned with SBW, size wise for sure, so perhaps he is better suited to that change into the midfield than a fullback like RTS.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about trying to make so the worst teams in it are not giving up when they are so far off the pace that we get really bad scorelines (when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together). I know it's not realistic to think those same exact teams are going to be competitive with a different model but I am inclined to think more competitive teams make it in with another modem. It's a catch 22 of course, you want teams to fight to be there next year, but they don't want to be there next year when theres less interest in it because the results are less interesting than league ones. If you ensure the best 20 possible make it somehow (say currently) each year they quickly change focus when things aren't going well enough and again interest dies. Will you're approach gradually work overtime? With the approach of the French league were a top 6 mega rich Premier League type club system might develop, maybe it will? But what of a model like Englands were its fairly competitive top 8 but orders or performances can jump around quite easily one year to the next? If the England sides are strong comparatively to the rest do they still remain in EPCR despite not consistently dominating in their own league?


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 6 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’
Search