Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Whipped off quite quickly': Pollard debut lasts just 27 minutes

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Handre Pollard limped off just 27 minutes into his Leicester debut just five weeks after a knee injury prematurely ended his Rugby Championship campaign with the Springboks. It was August 27 when the 2019 World Cup winner was hurt in his country’s loss to the Wallabies in Adelaide and his exclusion from their squad a few days later saw him fly to England to begin life with his new club.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the time the Springboks had suggested that Pollard was only a 20 per cent chance of being fit for the upcoming November tour of Europe, but it eventually emerged that the injury wasn’t as serious as initially feared and the 28-year-old was chosen on the bench by the Tigers for their October 1 round four Premiership trip to Saracens.

With Leicester trailing 27-13 at the interval, Steve Borthwick elected to make three changes at the break – including bringing Pollard on for winger Kini Murimurivalu. However, the South African’s debut appearance in the English league lasted only 27 minutes as he was withdrawn 13 minutes before the finish with an unexplained injury.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Ahead by 37-18 at the time, Saracens were attacking with a penalty advantage when Owen Farrell kicked the ball in behind the Leicester cover in the middle of the pitch and Pollard, who was wearing strapping on his right knee, was seen turning and running back while occupying a position out wide on his team’s left.

That was his last contribution as he was replaced by sub hooker Joe Taufete’e before the restarted play resulted in another try for Saracens, who went on to comfortably win 51-18. Leicester boss Borthwick didn’t specifically address the Pollard injury during his post-game TV interview.

“We lost our way with the penalty count and more changes had to come later due to injuries. You look at today and a number of players were playing their first game of the season and it looked like that, new combinations, new players playing together. There is going to be more of that so from our point of view we need to keep building the cohesion,” he said.

Live match broadcaster BT Sport were equally in the dark about the extent of this latest Pollard injury. Ugo Monye stated post-game: “Unfortunately we have not had an update on that but he was whipped off the pitch quite quickly. It was his first game and we just hope from a Leicester perspective that he is hopefully not away for too long.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ben Kay added: “He [Pollard] had a knee injury with South Africa which was why he missed the end of the Rugby Championship, so he has come back and made his first appearance on that (artificial) pitch which we know some players who have had knee injuries don’t like but it might be something totally different.

“When you have got someone like that you don’t want to throw them in and then break them, so maybe it is just precautionary.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 812 days ago

Conspiracy theorists out there might think they brought him back too early in order to bracket him from the end of year tour when the Boks are taking on arguably the best three sides in the world currently.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 51 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search