Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

White issues Erasmus advice if Springboks are to be World Cup challengers

White offers Erasmus some advice

Jake White is urging Springboks coach Rassie Erasmus to follow his World Cup winning lead and bring in an experienced coach to help prepare the team for next year’s tournament in Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

White supplemented his coaching panel in 2007 by asking Eddie Jones to bring his experience of having taken Australia to the final four years earlier where they lost to England in Sydney and believes this support was crucial to lifting the trophy in France.

White holds up the All Blacks coaching system as proof that you can never have too many “ cooks” when problem solving at international level and writes in his alloutrugby.com column that Erasmus should follow suit and puts forward a trio of Erasmus, Heyneke Meyer and Nick Mallett as one possible option.

White is adamant this kind of help would protect Erasmus from the kind of flak Jones has taken during a five-game losing run that ended with a win over the Springboks in Cape Town but Erasmus’s men took the series 2-1.

Jones has yet to appoint a new defence coach and is doing the head coach role and attack himself.

Video Spacer

White told alloutrugby.com: “When the pressure is on, that’s when you need guys with experience, because that’s when the holes open up.

“People understand the importance of having players with lots of Test caps who can handle the pressure of big games. Sometimes having a coaching staff made up of head coaches who understand the nuances of different situations, places and players is a hell of a bonus.

“I don’t have the perfect model, but the one with Wayne Smith, Steve Hansen and Graham Henry is the benchmark. In my time at the Boks, I had Gert Smal and Allister Coetzee who had been head coaches. And that’s why I got Eddie Jones to join us, because he’d been in the previous World Cup final. He’d been there and done it; it was a no-brainer.

ADVERTISEMENT

“After we won, people said it was because of Eddie. That doesn’t bother me at all because I’ve got no doubt that he helped us win – that’s the reason I brought him in!

“We didn’t necessarily do everything Eddie suggested, but the conversations we had made us better. We played good-cop, bad-cop and Eddie smoothed over speed bumps with players and management that could have slowed us down on the way to becoming world champions.

“Like the three guys who sat in the All Blacks box, we all had egos and our own ideas about the game, because it’s impossible that international head coaches are aligned on everything. Eddie has obviously been taking flak for England’s slump, and that kind of flak will eventually hit Rassie Erasmus just as it has hit Michael Cheika and Guy Noves. It happens to everyone.

“But maybe New Zealand have shown the way. If South Africa was coached by Rassie, Heyneke Meyer and Nick Mallett, wouldn’t the Boks be in a better position to avoid speed bumps, and win next year’s World Cup?”

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025? What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025?
Search