Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Who Scott Robertson believes is 'desperate' to dethrone Crusaders

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Super Rugby champions the Crusaders have reigned supreme for quite some time now, having won six titles as many years. Their dominance is simply unprecedented.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sports fans around the world have witnessed some incredible dynasties over the years, including Michael Jordan’s Chicago Bulls and Tom Brady’s New England Patriots.

But a rugby team, who calls a small island nation at the bottom of the world home, is in the midst of one of the greatest eras of dominance in the history of the 15-player game.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Including their maiden title in 1998, the Crusaders have won 11 championships – as well as another two in Super Rugby Aotearoa.

That’s 13 trophies in 25 seasons. To say that’s dominant is an understatement.

While Crusaders fans have come to expect success from their team, there are 11 franchises eager to dethrone the champions this season – including last year’s runners up.

Crusaders coach Scott Robertson believes the Blues will be “desperate and hungry” to win it all this season after losing last year’s final in Auckland.

“They’ll be desperate and hungry. They had a hell of a season, 15 in a row, won some tight games,” Robertson said on Weekend Sport with Jason Pine.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The Blues are always a great rival, the Chiefs are pretty special. The semi-final was just as tougher or tougher in some ways than the final.

“Every one of those challenges is different. All New Zealand teams on their day are tough to beat.

“The Aussies have built their squads a big better, I think they’re better than they were two or three years ago, the Waratahs especially.

“We know the Brumbies and the Reds have got a great foundation to their team, a lot of Australian players, but for me the Waratahs are a big mover.”

ADVERTISEMENT

As the adage goes, all good things must come to an end. Eventually, the Crusaders will reign no more.

Related

But rugby fans have been saying that for years, yet, time after time, the champions prove everyone wrong.

Six-time champion coach Scott Robertson said that while the team have “always got a target” on their backs, the Crusaders need to focus on what they can control.

“You get into it straightaway and it’s a race to the top of the table,” he added.

“Bit different to the northern hemisphere where they have a bit more of a slower, grind of a season where for us you’ve got to be right on from round one.

“We’ve always got a target… when they beat you they think it’s their final, people are crying and they’re elated.

“When you’ve been successful that’s all part of who you are but how do you evolve and how do you get better?

“We get used to it. At the start, the first couple of years, (we were) probably looking at others, now we look at ourselves a little bit more.

“How we enjoy and frame it so we see it as ‘every game is big for us and our opposition’, but how do we be our best every week? How do we be consistent? How do we create an environment where guys feel like they’re getting better? How do we make more All Blacks?

“I pride myself on making sure that every week is special.”

Super Rugby Pacific gets underway on Friday with a blockbuster New Zealand derby between the Crusaders and the Chiefs in Christchurch.

Later that day, Super Rugby kicks-off across the ditch with a clash between fierce rivals the Waratahs and Brumbies in Sydney.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 22 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search