Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why an ex-England 10 won't take issue with token Smith cap in Wales

(Photo by PA)

Former England international Andy Goode has explained why there should be no criticism of the token cap given to Marcus Smith versus Wales last Saturday. The round three Guinness Six Nations match was already in the 80th minute when Steve Borthwick threw Smith, Henry Arundell and Jack Walker into the fray for the last play of a match where the 20-10 result had been decided.

ADVERTISEMENT

The full-time whistle quickly blew after play restarted with a scrum as England knocked the ball on when they attempted to move it wide to the right of the set-piece and it meant that Smith and co headed back to the sidelines without having broken a sweat.

There was much debate in the aftermath as why Borthwick bothered with playing bench players for only a few seconds but ex-10 Goode was all for it as his Test career – during which at times he was a teammate of Borthwick’s – was pockmarked by internationals where he was left stewing unused on the bench and left feeling not part of the team.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I’ve been there,” he said on the latest Rugby Pod, explaining that there was a positive to Smith getting on for only a few seconds at the Principality. “The one that always sticks with me, Andy Robinson was the head coach of England, absolute cowboy, we are playing Italy away, we are winning by 40 points and I was the only f***er on the bench that didn’t get on. Not even for a second.

“I was raging after the game. I reckon I have been there about 10 times where I was on the bench for England and not come on, so I would have had 10 more caps. The game is won, you empty the bench, you give them a cap.

Related

“They’re not going to do anything because there is only a minute left but it just makes them feel part of it because I have been in a changing room where boys have had a win, and a comfortable win, and you have not got on and your kit is clean… He [Borthwick] wanted them to get on the field just to experience something. I don’t have a problem with it.”

Goode didn’t have a problem either that Borthwick kept his faith in skipper Owen Farrell despite his poor kicking off the tee keeping Wales in the contest on the scoreboard until the clinching 75h minute Ollie Lawrence try.

ADVERTISEMENT

“People are moaning that Marcus Smith should have come on, all this stuff. The way the game was, it would have taken a ballsy call to take Owen Farrell off and bring Marcus Smith on to completely change the game. Yes, that is what England fans potentially wanted to see but I thought during the game Owen Farrell played pretty well.

“His goal kicking, listen he is a world-class goalkicker, you can’t question his ability over his career as a goal kicker. He was 33 per cent at the weekend. I think he is 56 per cent over the Six Nations, which isn’t great, so you then have to question does he deserve his place in the team if he is the sole goal kicker.

“If there was someone else in that backline that could kick goals you would have expected that to swap over during the game but Borthwick has backed himself into a corner by making Farrell captain because it makes him undroppable.

“Normally, kicking is a strength of his game and the attacking side of it is perhaps not a strength but I thought at the weekend it was the other way around – his goal kicking was poor but the way he managed the game and the way he controlled field position and setting up how England played against a poor Wales team, he played pretty well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

While Farrell is now with England at their fallow week training camp in Brighton, Smith has been released to Harlequins in order to get some Gallagher Premiership game time this Saturday. That decision has resulted in George Ford getting called up to be the other out-half in this week’s training squad.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
B
BigMaul 630 days ago

Nonsense. The issue isn’t that Borthwick brought them on. It’s that he only gave them 15 seconds. That won’t make them feel part of the team. To feel part of the team they need meaningful minutes.

Also, there is another kicker in that back line - Slade is perfectly capable. So that comment is nonsense and Farrell really should have swallowed his pride and handed the kicking duties to Slade - something any good captain would recognise.

Finally, Farrell didn’t play “pretty well”. He kicked terribly from hand and tee and wasted overlaps. Defensively he was good, but with ball he was awful. And that should be the greater measure against a wooden spoon chasing Wales.

P
Poe 631 days ago

A ballsy call to pull Farrell? Why? Not exactly on fire was he? The distrust of the bench speaks volumes...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search