Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why Anton Lienert-Brown ‘wasn’t ready’ to leave New Zealand Rugby

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

All Black Anton Lienert-Brown is a competitor, and that’s why the veteran centre decided to fend off overseas interest by re-signing with New Zealand Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

Along with Crusaders flanker Ethan Blackadder, NZR confirmed on Tuesday that Lienert-Brown has decided to remain in New Zealand beyond this year’s Rugby World Cup in France.

Lienert-Brown has inked a new deal with NZR that will keep him in Aotearoa until the end of 2026. The 60-Test All Black will continue to play for the Chiefs, and is aligned with Waikato in the NPC.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

At this best, Lienert-Brown was certainly deserving of world-class status with the All Blacks.

The now 28-year-old was one of the best defensive centres in the game – and Lienert-Brown will continue to play an important role at Test level for the years to come.

But he’ll have his work cut out for him. There’s plenty of depth in the All Blacks’ midfield.

While Jordie Barrett and Rieko Ioane are potentially the favourites to start in the midfield, Lienert-Brown can add plenty of value off the bench – or as a backup option outside the matchday 23.

ADVERTISEMENT

Other options for the All Blacks, both now and in the years to come, include the likes of Jack Goodhue, David Havili, Braydon Ennor and Leicester Fainga’anuku.

But again, Lienert-Brown isn’t shying away from the challenge.

“As someone that loves competing, I know it’s a hot battle for that position,” Lienert-Brown told Newshub.

“I’m hungry to give it my best crack. I totally respect all the players fighting for that jersey.

“All I can do is give it my all.”

Throughout this year’s Super Rugby Pacific campaign, there’s been plenty of talk and speculation about the allure of All Blacks’ heading overseas to chase lucrative deals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Having made his mark at all levels of the sport in New Zealand, Lienert-Brown could’ve rode into the sunset with a smile on his face – embarking on a new challenge overseas.

But in his own words, the All Black “wasn’t ready.”

“My priority was to stay here in New Zealand. I’m still 28 and I think I’m young enough to give it a good crack,” he added.

“You’re competing with some of the best players in the world here in New Zealand.

“I know overseas there’s great players as well, but I love a challenge.

“But I wasn’t ready to go and take the money, I want to still compete here – that’s’ what I love doing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search