Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why Are The Pumas Performing So Much Better Than The Jaguares?

Juan Manuel Leguizamon /Getty

The All Blacks’ annihilation of the Wallabies in the opening fortnight of the Rugby Championship may be the headline act of the Spring International season, but the Pumas deserve praise for their performances against South Africans – especially after the Jaguares’ Super Rugby baptism of fire.

ADVERTISEMENT

A split series with South Africa to start the Rugby Championship was no less than the Pumas deserved and if not for the lack of composure that plagued the Jaguares in the Super Rugby series, the Argentinians could well be sitting unbeaten heading into the third round clash with the All Blacks.

When the Jaguares announced their roster for the Super Rugby season, hopes were high that the Argentinians could parlay their international experience into a decent showing in the southern hemisphere’s most taxing weekly grind. It was ostensibly the Argentinean test team, playing in a club competition. Surely, thought most pundits, they would be more than a match for any opposition.

The reality was this: Super Rugby’s expansion teams have rarely set the world on fire (the Brumbies being the only genuine exception) and the travel burden, coupled with the lack of familiarity with the rigours of week-in, week-out tournament play proved too much for the Jaguares to handle. In the end, they were a disappointment. However, there were signs that with more exposure to tournament play, the Jaguares could become a genuine force, rather than an occasional success.

Over the last two weeks, the Pumas have played with a greater intensity than they were able to show through their Jaguares exploits, but their style of play has neatly mirrored that of their Super Rugby season, reinforcing the notion that this is a team that can lift for the big occasion, if not produce results on a weekly basis.

Metres per carry, clean breaks, offloads, goal kicking percentage, and lineout percentage have all increased from the Super Rugby average, while the only real decrease in performance has come at the scrum, where the Pumas were especially troubled in the first test but eventually found a way to improve throughout the Salta match on the weekend.

 
banner

ADVERTISEMENT

 

That raises another crucial point about this Pumas side: exposure to weekly play has enhanced the side’s ability to make quick adjustments in game plan. In test one, the Pumas dominated the possession stats but a full 70% of that possession was used within their own half. In test two, that number had been reduced to just above 50% while it was South Africa that spent 70% of their time in possession inside their own half.

These statistics aren’t always indicators of success, especially when you consider the Pumas are still missing 20 tackles a game. Still, missing those tackles inside the opposition half is much better than missing them inside your own red zone, as the Pumas did in the first test in South Africa.

South African fans will claim that this is a weak Springbok side, but that does a disservice to the Pumas free-running game plan. The Springboks aren’t so much weak, as lacking conviction in the style of play that saw the Lions go all the way to the Super Rugby final. In both matches so far in the Rugby Championship it has been the Lions’ cavalry that has offered the team the most value, but they need to be given more freedom to express that.

The Pumas are expressing their intent in spades and head into week three of the competition second to the All Blacks in every key attacking statistic, boasting twice as many clean breaks (16) as the Springboks , twice as many offloads (12) as the Wallabies, and more passes, more metres, and more defenders beaten than both.

ADVERTISEMENT

Where there is still massive room for improvement is in discipline and ball retention. The scrum woes aside, the Pumas still must work harder on the lineout, where only Australia’s malfunctioning set piece boasts a worse percentage, and their competition-high penalty count and card record undermines their positivity on attack.

There will be some who suggest that the Argentineans simply find another gear when they put on the national colours and that stands to reason given their long history of exclusion from regular, competitive club contact. Perhaps no player has better illustrated that over the last couple of weeks than halfback Martin Landajo who was outstanding in the second test against the Springboks.

Landajo was a one-man playmaking machine over the weekend and has obviously been given a licence to control the game. In two tests he has averaged more carries, more metres, more clean breaks, more defenders beaten, and more try assists than he averaged in the entire Super Rugby season. He leads all halfbacks in every one of those statistics.

That’s the kind of play the Jaguares will be hoping to get out of their test playing roster in next year’s Super Rugby competition, and that’s the kind of play that will ensure the Pumas still have a win or two up their sleeves in this Rugby Championship.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search