Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why Boredom is the Crusaders' Secret Weapon

Super Rugby Rd 2 – Crusaders v Blues

The Crusaders will bore you to death, and that’s why they’re so good, writes Scotty Stevenson.

ADVERTISEMENT

It only took two rounds but any lingering doubts about the Crusadersability to perform without two of the best All Blacks of of all time evaporated with a gritty win over the Blues on Friday night. It wasnt pretty, it wasnt clinical, but it was illustrative of a hidden depth in the squad that had been hard to see beneath the bright lights of the clubs biggest names.

It was illustrative, too, of the power of the game plan. The Crusaders may have made subtle shifts over time, but at the heart of everything they do is an adherence to press defence rugby that feeds on opponentsmistakes. The Blues gladly dished up a smorgasbord of those, and the Crusaders filled their boots.

No Carter, no McCaw, no Matt Todd, no Tom Taylor, no Colin Slade, no Ryan Crotty – no worries. That was about the gist of it against a Blues side that was pinned inside its 22 metres for what seemed like the entire game. The Crusaders spent almost quarter of an hour sniffing around the Blues try line, and only some staunch defence and a willingness to concede penalties on the Blues’ part prevented the score from blowing out.

This game showed why the Crusaders can never be discounted as a playoff hopeful. They are robots. This is a team that slots players into a game plan, rather than builds a game plan around players. They spread the ball, probe the width, kick for turf, make their tackles and repeat.

That kind of footy requires organisation and drive, and in Andy Ellis they have a metronomic competitor who mitigates any loss of speed over time with a Rembrandts approach to scrum half play. His motto: Ill be there for you. He is the Chandler Bing of rugby.

On Friday night he was clobbered by a forearm and left the field for a concussion test. Midway through the examination, the Doctor asked him if he was feeling a little slow. His reply? Only because I am getting old.He sailed through the Head Injury Assessment (HIA) Protocol and sprinted back down the long player tunnel to retake his place in the game. It was typical Andy Ellis; hes like the Black Knight in the famous Monty Python sketch: Tis but a scratch.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ellis is the veteran in a backline that once was populated by All Blacks and is now comprised of age grade stars and a giant Fijian winger. The backline is there, mainly, to supply a series of hands for the ball to go through before it is invariably passed to Nemani Nadolo. The Crusaders made a tournament high 206 passes on Friday night. Ellis threw 64 of them. Most of them went to Nadolo.

There are plenty of critics when it comes to the Crusaders game plan. It doesnt rely on exciting counter-attack like the Chiefs and the Highlanders. It is not filled to the brim with revolutionary midfield moves, and it is nothing if not predictable. But when it is done well, it works. And on Friday night it was done very well indeed.

Even better for the Crusaders, they head into the bye having restored their pride on their home patch with a 13th straight defeat of the Blues in Christchurch and get this: they have the best post-bye record of any New Zealand team, winning 78% of their games after a break.

You may not be entertained by the Crusaders, but you have been warned.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search