Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘It’s Richie’s turn’: Why Damian McKenzie missed out on All Blacks selection

Damian McKenzie of the All Blacks celebrates with team mate Richie Mo'unga after scoring a try during the Rugby Championship and Bledisloe Cup match between the New Zealand All Blacks and the Australia Wallabies at Eden Park on August 07, 2021 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

All Blacks coach Ian Foster has explained the somewhat surprising decision to leave Damian McKenzie out of the matchday squad to take on fierce rivals South Africa in Auckland on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

If you’re reading this article and you love this sport, chances are you’ve heard the saying ‘a week is a long time in Test rugby.’

When the All Blacks named their first side of 2023 to take on Los Pumas in Mendoza about a week ago, McKenzie had won the race to start in the No. 10 jersey ahead of Richie Mo’unga.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

McKenzie was visibly excited in the leadup to the Test after being given the “first crack” at the famous jersey, while Beauden Barrett was named to start at fullback.

Following a shaky start at Estadio Malvinas Argentinas, which saw Pablo Matera charge down a McKenzie kick after about 20 seconds, the playmaker sprung into form.

McKenzie finished with three try assists in perfect conditions. The flyhalf had a mixed night off the kicking tee though, which was a minor blemish on an otherwise promising display.

But now, ahead of the All Blacks’ highly anticipated clash with world champions South Africa, McKenzie has been left out of the matchday side altogether.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Crusaders pivot Richie Mo’unga will start in the No. 10 jersey, while Beauden Barrett has retained his spot out the back.

“We looked at both 10s, both Richie and Damian. Pretty excited with their form at the end of the Super season,” coach Ian Foster told reporters on Thursday.

“Really pleased with Damian. I think we stated why we started Damian last week, that was a chance to get him in there, he’s been out for a long time, out of our squad so it’s a chance for him to go and play.

“Really enjoyed his game… it also gave Richie a chance to have a little bit of a breather. They’ve both had big minutes in Super Rugby, amongst the highest out of all our backs.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Now it’s Richie’s turn.”

McKenzie may have made a statement last weekend, but the All Blacks couldn’t fit him in their team to play the Springboks at all.

There wasn’t even room on the bench for the 41-Test All Black.

Utility Braydon Ennor has been named in the No. 22 jersey, and Caleb Clarke will also look to provide impact against a tiring Boks outfit. The All Blacks have gone with a 5-3 split.

“If you look at what Damian did in Super Rugby, he was one of the highest backs (for) minutes in Super Rugby, so we see this as a chance to give him a little bit of a breather,” Foster added.

“Certainly not based on anything else.”

The All Blacks take on the Springboks at Auckland’s Mt Smart Stadium on Saturday at 7.05 pm NZST. Following that Test, the Wallabies host Los Pumas in Sydney.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

14 Comments
J
Jonathan 527 days ago

Never any doubt this would happen. RM is still 1st choice at 10. Last week was about giving DM some game time as he is a valuable backup. Richie is a stronger player. He tackles better and is pretty decent at getting turnover ball. He's the 10 you need against the uber-physical Saffas. Don't get me wrong, DMac's a phenomenal talent too, and come RWC time he'll be a valuable addition to the team, but got the tougher physical games we don't have anyone better than Richie at 10.

B
Bruiser 527 days ago

RM has never stepped up against the big boys, the odd good game against Australia. D Mac is the future and present....back him now Foster

G
G 527 days ago

That's the game on Saturday...BB starting, weak back bench (Why not McKenzie or Narawa or Lester or Stevenson)...no x factor but that is Foster!

G
GrahamVF 527 days ago

I think DMac is in the same bracket as the Boks' KLA. They have both booked their plane tickets to France. Now the team management are using these opportunities to see who will make themselves indispensable. Richie and DMac were outstanding for their franchises in the SH competition as was Manie Libbok for the Stormers in the NH comp. Manie was given an opportunity to convert to international level and he took it, albeit with some imperfections. Richie really hasn't made the step up convincingly, so perhaps management is giving him the ultimate test to see if he is really ready for the biggest stage of all.

d
dave 527 days ago

Great to see Richie starting. Also Foster's reasoning for D Mac not on bench. Would have preferred McLeod or Stevenson over Clarke. Rather find out how they go than play someone who, in my opinion, doesn't deserve a place in the squad. Great to see Tamaiti getting a shot. Thoroughly deserved.

D
Def Kiwi 527 days ago

4 games before RWC and still chopping and changing. Should have stuck with Dmac at 10

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search