Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why Eddie Jones deserves credit for changing his ways - Andy Goode

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Eddie Jones’ England squad announcement has made waves again but, with one notable exception, he has picked on form and we should be applauding him for that. Clearly, Owen Farrell, who hasn’t played since mid-November, is the man with the special dispensation and is treated differently because of his leadership credentials.

ADVERTISEMENT

Farrell’s inclusion was expected but it is the addition of another fly-half, almost exactly ten years younger than the England captain, that has stolen all the headlines. It’s no reflection on Orlando Bailey because he is a youngster with a fair bit of talent and hopefully a very bright future in the game but I’m as bemused as everyone else about his inclusion ahead of certain other players.

There are other fly-halves who could have got the nod as well but, of course, George Ford is the name on everybody’s lips. He is 28-years-old, has 77 caps to his name and is in the form of his life. I understand the need to regenerate the squad but it is a bigger squad now with 36 players included and I was convinced that Ford would be recalled because of that.

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones announces England’s new-generation 2022 Six Nations squad

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones announces England’s new-generation 2022 Six Nations squad

The one thing I would say is that Marcus Smith will perhaps benefit from not having the pressure of a bang in-form Ford breathing down his neck. Everyone has been clamouring for him to be given the keys to drive this England side forwards and now he very much has.

I just hope Jones hasn’t backed himself into a corner if Smith and Farrell both pick up injuries because that was the case against Tonga in the autumn (Smith only trained fully at that week’s captain’s run and Farrell was a false positive test issue) and we saw George Furbank starting as the England No10. If that happens during the Six Nations, Ford should be getting a phone call.

Clearly, as well as being a bigger squad, this is a more fluid squad than the ones picked over the past couple of years when there was a reluctance to bring players in and out because of Covid. “We think this 36 for the first training week reflects a good balance of experience and up-and-coming talent,” Jones said.

Don’t be surprised if this squad changes a fair bit in the weeks to come and the likes of Sam Underhill and Elliot Daly have already been namechecked as players who may come back into the fold at a later date.

ADVERTISEMENT

Billy and Mako Vunipola’s names are going to be mentioned every time an England squad is named as well but the harsh facts are that they aren’t in the top two in their position anymore, with Ellis Genge, Joe Marler, Alex Dombrandt and Sam Simmonds ahead of them.

Ben Earl and Adam Radwan can count themselves more unlucky to miss out, having been involved in the international setup more recently, but Alfie Barbeary and Ollie Hassell-Collins have been on fire for their clubs recently so it is great to see them picked.

Barbeary hasn’t just been picked on his performance against Toulouse but it was a hell of a time to put in quite such a dominant display against the European champions and Hassell-Collins has made more linebreaks than anyone else in the Premiership this season.

At 6ft 4ins and around 100kgs, the London Irish man also has all the physical attributes to make the leap to international rugby. I commentated on an Irish game at the start of the season and I was taken aback by how big he was up close.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ollie Chessum is one inclusion that will have shocked a fair few people but I have been so impressed with him for Leicester and I’m really glad to see him in there. Jones likened him to Courtney Lawes himself and he does fit that mould as a really good lineout option who can carry and tackle all day.

He has started at blindside, number eight and second row in the last couple of months for Tigers and that versatility is definitely something that Jones is looking at with the World Cup not far around the corner now.

There are only a couple of Six Nations, a summer tour and an autumn campaign between now and the main event that Jones will be judged on and the likes of Chessum and Bailey, who can play ten, twelve and 15, become even more valuable when you are naming a 31-man squad.

Jones, of course, wants to win the Six Nations with England but there is no doubt that he has one eye on the World Cup because that is his end game. He is not going to lose his job if his team has a bad Six Nations, as we saw last year, but mixing things up now might help him in France next year.

You always look at who is not in the squad as opposed to who is actually in it but, with just a couple of exceptions, this is definitely an England squad picked on form and Jones deserves credit for changing his ways in that respect.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
P
Poorfour 1067 days ago

I'd agree with pretty much all of that, except to note that the other position he doesn't appear to have picked on form is tighthead.

Sinckler is below his best, Will Stuart has looked vulnerable in the scrum at international level and Joe Heyes is a prospect but still pretty green. The form English qualified tighthead over the last year has been Quins' Will Collier, who is clearly back to full fitness and benefitting from the input of Adam Jones and the competition from Wilco Louw. It's a shame he hasn't been included, given how strong the packs are across the board in the 6N.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search