Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why Fergus Burke could be the Crusaders' 'solution at fullback'

(Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Defending Super Rugby Pacific champions the Crusaders were dealt a cruel blow last weekend, with David Havili having been replaced inside the opening 10 minutes with an injury.

ADVERTISEMENT

With a grimace on his face, Havili walked off the field at Churchill Park holding his wrist in just the ninth minute.

The All Blacks star joins fellow internationals Will Jordan and Jack Goodhue on the sidelines, which may lead to a selection headache ahead of the Crusaders’ round four blockbuster against the Blues.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

After making eight changes to their starting XV to take on the Drua in Fiji, the Crusaders are expected to welcome back some key talent for their trip to Auckland.

But the Crusaders’ injury crisis still raises some questions.

Former All Blacks halfback Justin Marshall believes the Crusaders’ depth is “looking a little short” in their outside backs, and has weighed in on who should start at fullback.

“They’ve got to try and find a solution at fullback,” Marshall told SENZ’s In the Red.

“Chay Fihaki only got his first game at the weekend and he looked a little bit underdone (and) you can’t have an underdone player going into a game, a massive game like this, at Eden Park.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t think you can throw a youngster like Macca Springer in there so all of a sudden in an area where they had massive depth in the outside backs, the Crusaders are looking a little short.

“I don’t know what the answer to that is, apart from possibly playing Fergus Burke there.”

The Crusaders named a new-look side for their trip to Fiji, which ultimately ended up costing them as they lost a thriller 25-24.

Playmaker Richie Mo’unga didn’t play against the Drua, and neither did halves partner Mitchell Drummond.

ADVERTISEMENT

Should Mo’unga return to the starting side this weekend, Marshall believes Burke should start in the No. 15 jumper.

Related

“You’ve got that dual playmaker role, he’s a good defender, as is Richie Mo’unga so if they want to swap them around they can and put Mo’unga at 15 on defence,” he added.

“That’s where I’d go, so that’s a weird backline.

“We’re looking at… I’d go (Mitchell) Drummond, I would go for Mo’unga, I’d go for (Braydon) Ennor, (Leicester) Fainga’anuku, wing is Sevu Reece, fullback is Fergus Burke and then the other wing has kind of got me a little bit perplexed. Probably Fihake on the wing.”

The Crusaders began their season with a disastrous 31-10 loss at home against New Zealand rivals the Chiefs.

While they were able to get their season back on track with a emphatic win over the Highlanders in Super Round, the loss to the Drua has come as a shock to many.

The defending Super Rugby champions now risk falling to a 1-3 record if they can’t get it right against the Blues on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search