Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why Handre Pollard isn't in the conversation as the world's best flyhalf

Why Pollard isn't in the conversation as the world's best 10. (Photos/Gettys Images)

The ability of Handre Pollard is unquestioned, he has been the anointed heir as South Africa’s 10 for a long time, based on a stellar under-20 career where the flyhalf showcased rare gifts for such a young man across three junior World Championships.

However, at the Bulls his development has stalled. Amidst an organisation in decline, his Super Rugby career in South Africa has never reached great heights.

This has had an undoubted flow-on effect at the international level. He is not the finished product nor has he reached his full potential. The ace goal-kicker is just that: a sniper off the tee but not an assassin with ball-in-hand.

His responsibility and role within in the team has to be considered when deciding the world’s best 10, and Pollard’s role is nowhere near as integral to the Springboks as Barrett is to the All Blacks or Sexton is to Ireland.

His ball-playing and playmaking is nearly non-existent, as he takes a back seat to other more established players, playing a distributing role to allow Faf de Klerk to make the decisions and direct play, and Willie le Roux to make the plays on the edge.

In the Springboks game plan, Pollard is a cog but not a vital one.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Who handles the exit plays? Faf de Klerk with contested box kicks.

Where do the midfield out-of-hand kicks come from? Mainly De Klerk, sometimes Pollard and sometimes Le Roux.

Who dictates play around the field? Faf de Klerk. As a carry-heavy team, the Boks rely on phase play off nine far more than from the flyhalf.

Who takes over the play inside the 22-strike zone? Faf de Klerk.

Who is the set-piece attack built around? Strong first phase carries from Damian de Allende.  

The bulk of Springbok tries that flow through the backline are heavily influenced by either Faf de Klerk or Willie le Roux, not Handre Pollard. This is clear in all of the last three All Blacks’ clashes where the team put up 36, 32 and 16 points respectively.

In the first Wellington thriller in 2018, the Springboks’ first try was a combined effort stemming from the work of a number of players.

To begin with, Marx carried from the back of the lineout.

The next three phases were carries off De Klerk the same way to the left, thinning out the right-side All Blacks’ defence.

On the fourth phase with 20-metres of width remaining, De Klerk played out the back to Marx behind a dummy runner, who then gets Le Roux away down the edge. As the designated killer, Le Roux fixes Jordie Barrett and puts Aphiwe Dyantyi in untouched.

Pollard does not touch the ball once. In fact, none of the Springboks tries on that night have the fingerprints of Pollard on them.

It’s more of the same in the Pretoria re-match. Jesse Kriel’s try early in the first half comes after a Wille le Roux linebreak and quick hands the same way through a couple of tight five forwards.

De Allende’s try comes off pure power-running from Siya Kolisi and an offload around the corner to the open midfielder running in support.

The third try to Kolbe in the corner follows almost the exact same pattern as the opening Dyantyi try in Wellington – three phases the same way playing flat off De Klerk following a scrum, before a release to Le Roux on the edge to put the winger in.

In all three tries, Pollard plays as a distributor early on in the play or on the phase before and the try is created by someone else.

To see what happens to the Springboks with just Pollard, look no further than the November tests last year where they lost to England, Wales and just pulled through against Scotland.

Against England at Twickenham, they did not have either De Klerk or Le Roux and managed just 11 points against a side that a few months earlier they beat 2-1 across a three-match series at home, averaging 25 points. When De Klerk and Le Roux were both starting in that series, they went 2-0 and averaged 32.5 points a game with the two playmakers opening up England’s defence.

With key controller Le Roux back in the line-up against Wales in Cardiff, but without their key driver De Klerk, they were outclassed 20-11.

The only Springboks’ try of the night came after eight phases off the scrumhalf before a smart ‘face’ ball from Le Roux found Jesse Kriel open in the corner. Again, there was no handling involved from Pollard in the movement.

A man-of-the-match performance by Pollard at Murrayfield helped South Africa scrape by for a 26-20 win over Scotland, however when using this as weight for the argument of best 10 in the world, you will need more. Scotland are a good team on their day but themselves are not in the conversation as the world’s best. The same goes for Argentina who were dismantled by South Africa in the final round of The Rugby Championship. 

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2h2RyNII27/

In every aspect of the Boks’ game, Pollard isn’t the primary playmaker, game driver or decision-maker. To say he is in the same tier as Beauden Barrett, Owen Farrell or Jonathan Sexton is illogical, thoughtless and just plain wrong.

Does Pollard have the potential to get into the conversation? Yes, he does.

In order to do so, he will need to take over the reins of running the Springboks from de Klerk and le Roux, make the big plays and control the game against the best opposition, which currently he does not do, at least nowhere near to the extent of the others in the conversation. 

The Springboks have every chance to win this World Cup and it may be the clutch boot of Pollard that gets them over the line in crucial games. However, kicking the goals is just the icing on top and without the direction of Faf de Klerk or silky ball-handling of Le Roux, it’s hard to see them doing it. Injuries to either of those two would seriously put their campaign in jeopardy, as without both of them on the field, the Springboks haven’t looked as convincing over the last 18 months. 

Pollard is a very good player with plenty of untapped potential left, but reserve the talk of being the world’s best 10 until he at least becomes the main guy in his own team, equally responsible for driving his team around the park and making the big plays.

Rugby World Cup memories – Neil Back:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search