Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why it's time for the Springboks to rethink Damian Willemse's role

(Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images)

One of the big debates surrounding the Springboks squad in recent seasons has been the coaching team’s decision to use Damian Willemse in the fly-half role. After Manie Libbok produced a solid performance in South Africa’s win over Australia, Willemse got the pivotal role in the clash against the All Blacks in Auckland.

ADVERTISEMENT

Willemse failed to stamp his authority on the game, especially in the first half when the Springboks were being pummelled all over the park. With their backs against the wall, the Springboks needed some direction on the field, but it wasn’t coming from that fly-half channel.

To be fair, several of Willemse’s teammates also looked like they were shell-shocked in the opening stages and there was a lack of quality ball to work with.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

One could also make the case that Willemse was rusty, not having played since the URC and he also recently recovered from a knee injury. However, it was a Test match and you would have expected more from a player with his pedigree.

There was some indecisiveness with the ball in hand and the backline just looked devoid of ideas for much of the time when he was at fly-half. The Boks looked much better on attack when Willie le Roux slotted into that first receiver role, and it is a ploy the Boks adopted on a few occasions with him and Willemse starting in the same backline.

Related

Willemse has plenty of skill and speed and the full-back position gives him more time to make decisions and terrorise defenders around the park. Maybe it is time that Rassie Erasmus and Jacques Nienaber take a page out of John Dobson’s book when it comes to using Willemse in the backline.

The Stormers coach preferred to use the 25-year-old in the No15 and No.12 jerseys during the URC and European season and he flourished. In Auckland, another glaring difference between the All Blacks and the Springboks was the kicking game.

ADVERTISEMENT

All Blacks fly-half Richie Mo’unga and full-back Beauden Barrett put the Boks under constant pressure with high balls and accurate kicks in play and the Boks did not get that from their playmaker on Saturday. The Springboks coaches see Willemse as a utility player and the ultimate successor to Francois Steyn, who has now retired from the game.

It’s also understandable that Erasmus and Nienaber are preparing for every eventuality and with injuries being a big part of the game, Willemse could be the big solution at fly-half if resources are cut short during the Rugby World Cup.

However, the Boks would do well to give Libbok an extended run in that fly-half role until Handre Pollard gets back to full fitness. The more confidence Libbok gets on the international stage, the better it will be for the Springboks.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
D
Daragh 521 days ago

10 is a huge issue for SA and it will cost them the World Cup. Pollard, who is past it & will be rusty, must start simply down to goalkicking. Libbok / Willemese / De Klerk / Kolbe all not reliable, and given SA's game plan and DNA of taking their shots at goal, scrum penalties etc. Cost them the game vs Ireland in November and hampered them vs France too. You can't have Cheslin Kolbe lining up a touchline conversion in a tight World Cup game. Someone like Curwin Bosch / Johann Goosen would be a better option for this year, can focus on developing Libbok for the next WC cycle then, whilst using Willemse as utility back in the 23 shirt, not a 10. Bosch harshly overlooked for SA, good season with Sharks and played well in Champions Cup too.

B
Bob Marler 521 days ago

Willemse needed to be tested at flyhalf against a team like the all blacks. Libbok (and Williams) got a run too.

We must not lose sight of the fact that the SA pack failed miserably in that first 20. But if we learned anything from the last two games:

  1. Libbok is an out and out flyhalf and should be the focused backup to Pollard. He has shown that he is capable. More than capable to be trusted to start at 10. Why else have him in the team. \n\n
  2. Willemse has shown that he is a capable backup in the event Pollard and (Libbok) are out. 3rd choice 10 out of necessity. I’d sooner have Willie Le Roux cover 10 in an emergency. \n\n
  3. Willemse should be the focused option for 15. Either starting at 15 or coming off the bench ala Frans Steyn 2019. Covering 15, 12 and 10 (in that order).
Pollard is likely going to come back rusty. We have to prepare for that. Libbok needs to go into the RWC firing and confident at flyhalf.

The time for experimenting is over. We need settled combinations. It’s too late to find another flyhalf option. We need to back Libbok.

Based on the last two games (and form) I would be starting the following back line against Argentina:
  1. Faf
  2. Libbok We need to see this combination have a full run. \n\n
  3. KLA
  4. de Allende de Allende had a bad game, but he needs game time. \n\n
  5. Am
  6. Kolbe
  7. Le Roux Le Roux needs game time. And should cover 10 if Libbok needs to be replaced.
Bench:
Grant Williams
Damian Willemse (come in at 15)
Andre Esterhuizen
He is looking too good to leave out again and should come in for a run. Or start at 12 with de Allende off the bench.

Argentina is the real scenario where we are without 2 x 10s on the match day sheet. We can’t have a 6/2 bench in this scenario.

When Pollard is back:
  1. Faf
  2. Libbok/Pollard
  3. KLA
  4. de Allende/Esterhuizen
  5. Am
  6. Kolbe
  7. Le Roux
Bench:
Grant Williams
Damian Willemse
Libbok/Pollard

This is my prediction for what we will see in the back line at the RWC. I don’t necessarily agree with it - but this is what I think Jacques Nienaber will go for in the big games or see this as the “1st Team” - injuries etc aside.

S
Silk 521 days ago

I understand the reasons for experimentation. But I think that is enough now. Libbok must start until Pollard is back. Time to use specialists at flyhalf. I'm not a Libbok fan, but he played well against AUS.
Still have my doubts about him in high pressure games.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search