Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why Japan's 19-year-old fullback sensation has been pulled from national duty

Yoshitaka Yazaki of Japan run with the ball during the International Test match between Japan and Italy at Sapporo Dome on July 21, 2024 in Sapporo, Japan. (Photo by Kenta Harada/Getty Images)

On August 30th, team Japan announced its roster for the upcoming matches in the Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup for their game against the United States.

The biggest talking point is the exclusion of fullback Yoshitaka Yazaki.

Yazaki, the youngest member of the team at 19 years old, is a sophomore at Waseda University and has been standing out with his running skills and speed since his days at Toin Gakuen High School.

Head coach Eddie Jones recognized his talent, giving him a starting position as a fullback in all six test matches, from the first one against England to the opening PNC match against Canada.

Yazaki’s performances in these test matches have shown both potential and inexperience. What’s certain is that Jones has consistently praised him in every press conference. Before the Canada match, Jones openly expressed that, “He is currently the best fullback in Japan.”

The reason for Yazaki’s exclusion, despite Jones’s strong support, is due to the start of Waseda University’s rugby season in September.

It seems there was an agreement between the national team and the university that Yazaki’s participation would only be before the university season begins. While it might be puzzling that university games take higher priorities than test matches, this is not uncommon in Japan.

University rugby in Japan has enjoyed deep-rooted popularity since before World War II. The annual fixture between Waseda and Meiji University, held on the first Sunday of December, has historically drawn 60,000 spectators—more than Japan’s national team games.

Even today, there are a number of fans who prioritize university rugby over the national team.

In Japan, talented players typically progress from high school to university, where they play rugby for four years before joining a League One team after graduation. During their professional career, they focus on rugby, and after retirement, they remain with their companies as full-time employees. This has been the norm for decades.

However, this trend is slowly beginning to change. The first trailblazer in this shift was Shota Fukui of the Saitama Panasonic Wild Knights.

Fukui, now 23 years old, made a name for himself at Higashi Fukuoka High School and was selected for every age-group category from U17 onward. While it was expected that he would move on to a top-tier university, Fukui chose the path of becoming a professional player after graduating high school, supported by his strong will and the Wild Knights.

Of course, he didn’t become a starting player immediately. However, under the guidance of Robbie Deans, Fukui developed steadily and even played in last year’s World Cup. Though currently sidelined due to injury, there’s no doubt he will continue to compete for a regular spot on the national team.

Team Form

Last 5 Games

1
Wins
3
1
Streak
3
14
Tries Scored
13
-138
Points Difference
2
2/5
First Try
2/5
2/5
First Points
2/5
1/5
Race To 10 Points
2/5

Warner Dearns, who scored two tries and was named Man of the Match in the PNC opener against Canada, followed a similar path.

Born in Wellington and starting rugby at the Napier Pirates at the age of four, Dearns, now 22, moved to Chiba in his youth when his father, Grant, coached NEC Green Rockets. He attended an international school and then went on to Ryutsu Keizai University Kashiwa High School, where he excelled in high school rugby.

While it was expected that he would continue on to Ryutsu Keizai University, he instead joined Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo in 2021 after graduation. Last season, Toshiba won the Japanese championship for the first time in 10 years, with Dearns playing a significant role alongside Michael Leitch.

It’s clear that talented players like Fukui and Dearns mature faster as rugby players by joining League One directly after high school. With the global acceleration of rugby’s evolution, some are questioning the relevance of university-level sports.

Jones, however, shows respect for and acknowledges the value of Japan’s university rugby. “The four years of balancing rugby with academics are important,” he says, supporting Yazaki’s university life. In press conferences, he always remembers to thank the university team and emphasizes that “we are always in communication with the clubs,” maintaining a good relationship.

There’s another crucial aspect of university rugby. Only a handful of players continue to play rugby at the top level after being part of a strong university team. The majority end their rugby careers at university, with some entering global companies afterward. These individuals pour the same passion they had for rugby into their work and rise to positions of influence within their companies, supporting Japanese rugby. Japan’s corporate-backed rugby scene couldn’t exist without these university alumni.

For example, Mitsubishi Estate, a leading real estate developer and the official sponsor of Japan’s national team began supporting rugby thanks to Shinsaku Takada, who captained Keio University to its first university championship in its 100th year in 2000.

Takada joined the company in 2005, starting in tenant sales for office buildings. In 2018, he launched a project within the company to integrate sports and urban development, leading to the successful “Marunouchi 15th Street Project” near Tokyo Station during the 2019 Rugby World Cup.

The true value of university rugby in Japan lies in producing such individuals. If university rugby were to decline, the foundation of Japanese rugby would be shaken. Jones understands this well.

The Japan national team will face the All Blacks, England, and France in the autumn series. While Jones would love to give Yazaki more experience, Waseda University also has crucial matches against strong teams during this period.

Whether Yazaki’s name will appear on the November roster will depend on the discussions between Jones and Waseda University in the coming weeks.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

so what's the point?

A deep question!


First, the point would be you wouldn't have a share of those penalities if you didn't choose good scrummers right.


So having incentive to scrummaging well gives more space in the field through having less mobile players.


This balance is what we always strive to come back to being the focus of any law change right.


So to bring that back to some of the points in this article, if changing the current 'offense' structure of scrums, to say not penalizing a team that's doing their utmost to hold up the scrum (allowing play to continue even if they did finally succumb to collapsing or w/e for example), how are we going to stop that from creating a situation were a coach can prioritize the open play abilities of their tight five, sacrificing pure scrummaging, because they won't be overly punished by having a weak scrum?


But to get back on topic, yes, that balance is too skewed, the prevalence has been too much/frequent.


At the highest level, with the best referees and most capable props, it can play out appealingly well. As you go down the levels, the coaching of tactics seems to remain high, but the ability of the players to adapt and hold their scrum up against that guy boring, or the skill of the ref in determining what the cause was and which of those two to penalize, quickly degrades the quality of the contest and spectacle imo (thank good european rugby left that phase behind!)


Personally I have some very drastic changes in mind for the game that easily remedy this prpblem (as they do for all circumstances), but the scope of them is too great to bring into this context (some I have brought in were applicable), and without them I can only resolve to come up with lots of 'finicky' like those here. It is easy to understand why there is reluctance in their uptake.


I also think it is very folly of WR to try and create this 'perfect' picture of simple laws that can be used to cover all aspects of the game, like 'a game to be played on your feet' etc, and not accept it needs lots of little unique laws like these. I'd be really happy to create some arbitrary advantage for the scrum victors (similar angle to yours), like if you can make your scrum go forward, that resets the offside line from being the ball to the back foot etc, so as to create a way where your scrum wins a foot be "5 meters back" from the scrum becomes 7, or not being able to advance forward past the offisde line (attack gets a free run at you somehow, or devide the field into segments and require certain numbers to remain in the other sgements (like the 30m circle/fielders behind square requirements in cricket). If you're defending and you go forward then not just is your 9 still allowed to harras the opposition but the backline can move up from the 5m line to the scrum line or something.


Make it a real mini game, take your solutions and making them all circumstantial. Having differences between quick ball or ball held in longer, being able to go forward, or being pushed backwards, even to where the scrum stops and the ref puts his arm out in your favour. Think of like a quick tap scenario, but where theres no tap. If the defending team collapses the scrum in honest attempt (even allow the attacking side to collapse it after gong forward) the ball can be picked up (by say the eight) who can run forward without being allowed to be tackled until he's past the back of the scrum for example. It's like a little mini picture of where the defence is scrambling back onside after a quick tap was taken.


The purpose/intent (of any such gimmick) is that it's going to be so much harder to stop his momentum, and subsequent tempo, that it's a really good advantage for having such a powerful scrum. No change of play to a lineout or blowing of the whistle needed.

165 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind
Search