Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why new Rugby Australia chair Daniel Herbert needs to be quiet

Newly appointed Rugby Australia Chair Daniel Herbert poses for a portrait during a press conference at GPS Rugby Club on November 20, 2023 in Brisbane, Australia. (Photo by Albert Perez/Getty Images)

I would encourage new Rugby Australia chairman Daniel Herbert to be quiet.

ADVERTISEMENT

Don’t air the organisation’s business in public. Don’t hire a national coach capable of going rogue. Don’t go seeking publicity and sugar-hits from raids on rugby league players.

Do the boring stuff. Grow your game, coach players to get better, support them at all times and cherish your competition and broadcast partners.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

I tend to mythologise the Wallaby teams of the last 1990s and early 2000s but, actually, for much of my life Australia has been an outstanding rugby nation.

I properly started watching test rugby in the 1980s. I well remember Australia’s series win over New Zealand in 1980, David Campese running rings around us at Athletic Park in 1982, Alan Jones coaching them to another series here in 1986, the world champion All Blacks surrendering their long unbeaten run at Athletic Park in 1990.

Their 1992 series win over the All Blacks was an absolute belter too.

Big forwards, skillful backs, there was so much to like about Wallaby rugby.

In the absence of apartheid South Africa, they were by far our greatest foes.

The Home Nations weren’t the forces they are now. France was always competitive, but there was a sense of shared endeavour in the way rugby was run in New Zealand in Australia.

ADVERTISEMENT

We each needed competition and each needed to grow and we largely did that together.

I won’t linger on the departure of Hamish McLennan as Rugby Australia chairman or the search to find a Wallaby coach to replace Eddie Jones.

Both men are gone and picking apart their tenures is of no benefit to anyone. We need Australia now as much as we’ve ever done.

It’s not for New Zealand to hold the whip hand in the trans-Tasman rugby relationship. It’s not for us to tell them how to run their game or even to criticise the capability of their Super Rugby clubs.

If Australia isn’t good at test and franchise level, we won’t be good either. We’re not big enough to go it alone. If there was a market for an elite domestic competition here, we’d have it by now.

ADVERTISEMENT

If we have designs on winning Rugby World Cups again, then we have to ensure our strongest competition comes from Australia.

It’s not a time to be at loggerheads or resorting to the foghorn diplomacy, of which McLennan was fond. We need collaboration.

So let’s have more competition and a greater sharing of ideas. Schools rugby, club rugby, provincial rugby – let’s play each other at as many levels as we’re able.

Rugby in Australia loses players to other codes in a way we don’t really have here.

Well, clear pathways to high performance – that include regular competition with your New Zealand counterparts – might keep more future Wallabies in the game.

If I was running rugby in Australia and New Zealand, I’d want a strategic partnership at all levels of our game. I’d want to attract people to rugby and work hard to keep them via a shared pathway.

The All Blacks and Wallabies will largely take care of themselves in the short term but, if we want sustained success on the world stage, we have to work together.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

18 Comments
B
Bob Marler 386 days ago

Yes! Daniel Herbert must STFU!

Who is Daniel Herbert?

j
john 395 days ago

A few less kiwi coaches in Australia undermining us would help.

All they have done is dragged us down.

NZ coaches in Australia have tried to ensure NZ teams have been playing against Australian teams who are copies of NZ teams, making it easy for them. Instead of coming up against some Aussie innovation and brains. It’s been deliberate.

Do us a favour will ya and bugger off.

B
Bruce 396 days ago

Hamish I largely disagree with everything you say but with this article you have hit the nail on the head. Rugby is strong when there are as many international side performing as possible.
While you would say that the international game has never been stronger arguably 2 nations (England and Australia) could pick their game up and make it more competitive,(not to mention Wales and Scotland).
I strongly believe that if there is a close relationship between NZ and Aus that they have the players to get back to the top. They weren’t that far away last year, it was only the brain dead idea to get rid of Rennie that undermined them at the World Cup. Here’s hoping that there can be stability over in OZ and they can get their house in order.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search