Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ngani Laumape's biggest loss to New Zealand rugby won't be on the field

Ngani Laumape and Sam Cane. (Photos by Photosport)

Just when Ngani Laumape is really starting to make a name for himself, the All Blacks midfielder is heading off overseas.

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s not ‘making a name for himself’ in the playing sense, however.

Laumape started to come into his own as a rugby union player in 2017 after first making the shift back from the the 13-man code a year prior and by the time the World Cup rolled around, he was about as useful a player as he was ever going to be for the All Blacks.

That’s not to say he hasn’t improved since then, but his kicking and distribution games won’t set him apart from any of New Zealand’s other major midfield contenders. If the selectors didn’t like his game in 2018, when he was at the peak of his destructive powers, their minds weren’t going to change over the past two seasons.

Video Spacer

James Parsons and Bryn Hall talk about all the action and news from the week of rugby in New Zealand and across the world.

Video Spacer

James Parsons and Bryn Hall talk about all the action and news from the week of rugby in New Zealand and across the world.

Where Lauampe is coming into his own, however, is his public displays of honesty.

Following Laumape’s starring role in the Hurricanes’ win over the Blues last July, the midfielder held nothing back in the post-match interview, firing a shot at his critics.

“It’s good to be out here and to perform the way I did,” he said. “A lot of people have been disrespecting my name and I wanted to come out and show everyone the way that I play.

“I’m happy with that. Let those people keep disrespecting my name, because I’m going to turn up every week.”

“Too much people talking, I’m just going to be me.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Today, ahead of his final match for the Hurricanes before heading off to France, Laumape was equally candid.

Having been low-balled by New Zealand Rugby in his most recent contract negotiations, Laumape had no qualms considering alternative options elsewhere.

“I’m pretty disappointed because I think I offer something in the midfield that no other midfielder can offer in New Zealand,” Laumape told media.

“It wasn’t hard [to make a decision] when I was offered a contract that was asking me to take less in income. Once that had come into perspective, I had to make the best decision for me and my kids.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Whether you think Laumape deserved more opportunities with the All Blacks or was under-valued by NZR, it’s impossible not to appreciate his recent openness. The game will be worse off without Laumape’s honest responses because it’s such a shift away from what rugby players are normally willing to say.

Sam Cane was dragged over the coals last year when he made comments about the criticism that professional players receive from the wider public which any reasonable punter would find impossible to disagree with.

“You’ve just got to remind yourself hey, they may like to think they know a lot about the game of rugby. In reality, they don’t really,” Cane said on Sky Sport’s The Breakdown.

It perhaps wasn’t the wisest thing to say because of the inevitable blowback – but it was honest and it was accurate, and rugby needs more of it.

Rugby needs characters that are willing to speak out, have opinions and be honest because that infinitely improves the product on offer. That doesn’t mean they need to spout hate, but they should be able to reveal their feelings without being maligned.

Professional sports needs heroes and villains – it works incredibly well for the NBA and it’s something that rugby is sorely missing, particularly in New Zealand where the national union has significant control over all parties concerned.

That’s not a problem in of itself, as long as players are willing to behave like individuals – but that’s never going to happen if they get shut down every time they open their mouths and speak ‘out of turn’, as some would say.

Laumape is one of the few players that’s willing to put himself out there and take hits from the critics – and he’ll inevitably face some backlash due to his latest comments – and with him now leaving New Zealand, there’s one less role model for budding players to look up to as someone who’s willing to put their opinion out there.

Ngani Laumape will be missed. Perhaps the Hurricanes will find a replacement for the midfield wrecking ball, and perhaps the All Blacks will go on without him, but Laumape’s candid responses won’t be replaced so easily, and that might be the biggest hole he leaves in the New Zealand rugby landscape.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 38 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

306 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat
Search