Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Siya Kolisi is right: The Springbok Women are a force on the rise

CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA - OCTOBER 12: South Africa players sing their national anthem prior to the WXV 2 2024 match between South Africa and Italy at Athlone Sports Stadium on October 12, 2024 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo by Johan Rynners - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Let’s be frank; the South African Springbok Women have been rubbish for almost all of their history.

ADVERTISEMENT

No need to beat around the bush. The bare facts provide a bulletproof argument. Currently ranked 12th on World Rugby’s charts, they’ve never climbed higher than 10th and haven’t done so since 2011.

They’ve never qualified beyond the pool stage of a World Cup and have a paltry three wins and 15 defeats from their four appearances along with a points difference of -590. They did not even bother entering the 2017 edition.

Video Spacer

Swys De Bruin on Bok Women’s big plan for World Cup

Video Spacer

Swys De Bruin on Bok Women’s big plan for World Cup

In 24 matches against England, France, New Zealand, Australia, Italy, Ireland, Fiji and Canada, they’ve not recorded a single win.

Of course this isn’t the fault of the players and coaches who toiled for long without recognition or support for so much of this story. These often forgotten heroes did their best under trying conditions and without the requisite assistance from those with their hands on the levers of power.

No one could deny that rugby is disproportionally tilted towards the men’s game around the world, but nowhere is this imbalance more starkly represented than in South Africa.

Four men’s World Cup triumphs stand as a monument to the oval ball in the nation. Players are deified. Coaches are regarded as all-knowing gurus. Fables rooted in hardship and struggle are tethered to heroic exploits on the pitch.

ADVERTISEMENT

There’s even a Hollywood blockbuster chronicling this history to go along with scores of documentaries and books celebrating a truly impressive sporting institution. Meanwhile, the women’s game has barely registered more than a blip on the radar of most fans

Other countries have fared much better in this regard. New Zealand – with all their six World Cup crowns – and England – with their semi-professional domestic league and their ongoing run of dominance – are the torchbearers.

But even less heralded boards have struck a balance. The French are regularly competitive while the women’s teams of the United States, Canada and Spain have traditionally outperformed their male counterparts.

Related

But if rugby is a religion in South Africa, as we’re told so often by practitioners and devotees, why then has half the population been consigned to second class status? In a country with unchecked domestic violence and staggering rape statistics an obvious answer concerns the culture of the place.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many female Springboks speak of their early ignorance concerning their own prospects in the game. “I didn’t know that girls could play rugby,” Tayla Kinsey, the Boks scrum-half, told me recently when recalling her childhood.

This is sexism, plain and simple. In South Africa, men who play any other winter sport, such as hockey, are labelled as effeminate. Eating mountains of meat, drinking gallons of beer, talking loud and direct, hitting hard, lifting weights; these are all virtues that would be recognisable in most cultures, but anyone who has spent time in South Africa and abroad will know that those in Mzansi do things a little differently.

Even the self-identifying alpha-bros must admit that this can often veer towards toxicity.

But this only half explains why women’s rugby in South Africa has stagnated while the men’s game has flourished. The uncomfortable truth is that they’ve been sorely underfunded. Major stakeholders, key sponsors and the governing body itself has treated the women’s game as less than an afterthought. Most of the men in suits who run the show have scarcely considered the women’s game at all.

Things are now changing. And as a consequence of this shift, South Africa might one day, in the not too distant future, dominate the sport across both genders. You might as well get on board now as an early adopter; the Springboks are a force on the rise.

Related

That reads like hyperbole given their recent show in the WXV 2. A narrow 31-24 win over Japan was followed by two losses to Australia (33-26) and Italy (23-19). They finished fourth in their six-team group, down from third the year before. Is this really a sign of progress?

As with most things in sport the answer lies beneath the scoreline and requires a wider lens. The tournament was hosted in South Africa with games staged in Cape Town at DHL Stadium, where the men’s side and the Stormers play, and Athlone Sports Stadium.

Siya Kolisi was a near-constant presence as he championed his fellow Boks, even wearing a jersey specifically made for women. The largest available shirt was still too small but nonetheless he squeezed it over his hulking frame and later appeared on an influential podcast on women’s rugby to amplify his support.

Rugby’s greatest statesman, arguably the most influential player beyond the boundary in the sport’s 153-year history, has thrown his considerable weight behind a developing project.

Kolisi is not alone. Rassie Erasmus has singled out the Springbok Women as an important branch of the organisation that needs improvement. “We need rugby to be taught and endorsed from a woman’s perspective,” he said in March 2022.

“We will have a competitive system, sooner rather than later, but we are also realistic and know it will not be possible to perform any miracles.”

Lynne Cantwell, a respected coach and retired Irish player, was brought on board to serve as a high performance manager. Last year the Bulls Daisies became the first fully professional outfit in South Africa, allowing players to focus solely on rugby.

Related

Two months ago, Swys de Bruin, the former coach of the men’s Lions team and an assistant with the men’s Springboks, was appointed as coach of the women’s side. His impact has been immediate with noticeable improvements on 22 exits, set pieces, first-phase strike plays and support lines offered by outside backs.

Nadine Roos looks a serious prospect at fly-half and a burgeoning bench mimicking the men’s Bomb Squad offers the ability to land punches until the 80th minute.

Work-ons are needed elsewhere. Defence is still an issue, especially against the rolling maul that is so pivotal in the women’s game. Conditioning remains a challenge and a lack of robust competition back home, where the Daisies now rule the league with an iron fist, could potentially see a bottleneck of talent develop.

But more players plying their trade in England, such as the Harlequins prop Babalwa Latsha and the Leicester lock Catha Jacobs, point to the quality within the team.

This won’t be a quick fix and simply qualifying for the knockout rounds of next year’s world Cup might be beyond them. But a kind draw, and a little luck, could see them step into uncharted territory.

Beyond that, their potential is limitless. One only has to look at what the men’s side has achieved to grasp what is possible.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
B
BC 31 days ago

2025 RWC will be too early for them but from 2029 onwards they will be a team to be reckoned with. Good for the global game.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

286 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The 'too small, physically out of his depth' Sam Prendergast verdict The 'too small, physically out of his depth' Sam Prendergast verdict
Search