Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why Saracens are 'grateful' for what Saints did with Nick Isiekwe

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

When it comes to the contingent of loan players Saracens sent off to play elsewhere during their year in the Championship, the name of Nick Isiekwe doesn’t garner much focus compared to how Ben Earl and Max Malins were capped by England while at Bristol and Nick Tompkins continued to be chosen by Wales while at Dragons. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Northampton had a disappointing campaign last term, getting tailed off in fifth place in the Premiership and failing to fire a shot in Europe, but that didn’t mean there weren’t positives to be gleaned from the work put in under Chris Boyd. 

Isiekwe was 19 when he was first capped by Eddie Jones in 2017 and while his England career has yet to build on his third appearance in June 2018, Saracens believed they are now reaping the reward of the year the lock spent on loan in the Premiership with the Saints rather than remaining in London for the second-tier Championship season. 

Video Spacer

Dan Biggar on why the Autumn Nations Series is the most brutal of all

Video Spacer

Dan Biggar on why the Autumn Nations Series is the most brutal of all

The now 23-year-old, who can also pack down at blindside, is set for his sixth consecutive start this Sunday at Harlequins in Saracens’ campaign back in the Premiership and he is joined in his club’s starting XV by Andy Christie, another academy graduate who has also been impressing boss Mark McCall in recent weeks.  

“Nick is 23 and Andy is 22 – both have come through the academy and both have been at the club for a long time,” said McCall when asked how the pair have been developing. “It is wonderful for us just to see the progress that they are making. 

“Sometimes it is hard. Nick, at 23, seems to have been around for such a long time and he has already achieved quite a lot and has played in some big games for us and been capped by England a couple of times. He had a constructive year at Northampton where they gave him some responsibility which we are really grateful for and he has taken some big responsibility here to call the lineouts, especially when Maro (Itoje) is not here – which is a lot of the time – and we think that is going to valuable for him in the future. 

“He is a great asset, a hard worker. He is keen to get better, so he is a great guy to have back. Andy has made some big improvements over the last twelve months. He is one of the big beneficiaries of us loaning people out like Ben Earl and Nick. Andy and Sean Reffell played a lot of games in the Championship last year and Andy has just got better and better. He was very good coming off the bench against Bath, he started last weekend and he looked very comfortable. We are really happy with his progress as well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 50 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search