Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why the Waratahs aren't as bad as their record defeat against the Hurricanes suggests

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Former Blues captain James Parsons believes the Waratahs aren’t as bad as their results this season suggests, despite calls from within the New South Wales franchise for significant changes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Waratahs interim co-coach Chris Whitaker called for a cultural overhaul in the wake of his side’s record 64-48 thumping at the hands of the Hurricanes in Sydney last Friday.

The result was the side’s ninth straight defeat as they continue to search for their first win in a disastrous 2021 campaign that saw Rob Penney axed from the head coach role in March.

Video Spacer

The Lions and Springboks media wind up and why the Aussies went 0-5 on the weekend | Aotearoa Rugby Pod | RugbyPass

Video Spacer

The Lions and Springboks media wind up and why the Aussies went 0-5 on the weekend | Aotearoa Rugby Pod | RugbyPass

Whitaker has since joined Jason Gilmore in stepping up from their assistant roles to take over as interim co-coaches, but the ex-Wallabies halfback a significant shift in mindset is required to save the fledgling club.

“There were just too many soft tries. It’s just not acceptable. There were three or four tries where individuals need to put their hand up and say that’s not good enough,” the 46-year-old said shortly after Friday’s loss.

“The sad thing is there was some good footy out there. Both sides played some good footy and unfortunately the fact that they scored 60-odd points is going to overshadow that we scored 48.”

He added that the hunger for attacking rugby within the Sydney rugby scene over the last two decades has resulted in the neglect of defensive responsibilities.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Because we’re an attacking team, defence has been on the back burner for so long,” Whitaker said. “In the Sydney market, everyone wants to see attacking rugby but I think the mindset needs to change.

“If you look at teams around the world who win competitions, it’s on the back of their defence.”

However, speaking on the Aotearoa Rugby Pod, Parsons was optimistic about the Waratahs’ chances of defensive improvement as he attributed their heavy defeat to a lack of exposure against New Zealand opposition.

Last weekend’s match was the first time the Waratahs played a Kiwi side since last March, when they suffered a hefty defeat to the Chiefs in Wollongong during the pre-COVID Super Rugby season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Between last July and April, the Waratahs had only played Australian opposition across two seasons of Super Rugby AU before they opened their Super Rugby Trans-Tasman campaign against the Hurricanes.

While Parsons conceded that the New South Welshmen can’t afford to concede as many points as they did at the Sydney Cricket Ground, the two-test All Black said they will improve as they become more accustomed to their new opponents.

“What they’re trying to do, I suppose, is send a message to the fans that they understand it’s not looking right and they’re trying to put things in place to get a change,” Parsons told the Aotearoa Rugby Pod of Whitaker’s comments.

It’s not ideal to the players, but the players also understand the scoreline is not ideal as well. 

“At the end of the day, we are in a results-based business, so you do have to shore up and can’t allow that many points, but I think it will tighten up.”

Parsons used an example from last Friday’s match as an example of how the Waratahs can build their defence against the New Zealand sides by pointing to Peter Umaga-Jensen’s try in the 61st minute.

The try came off a simple set move near the halfway line, where fullback Jordie Barrett sat in behind a three-man pod comprised of James Blackwell on the short side, Isaia Walker-Leawere in the middle, and Du’Plessis Kirifi on the far side.

First-five Orbyn Leger passed the ball to Walker-Leawere, labelled by Parsons as the “forward runner” of the pod, who took the ball to the line.

With Kirifi – the “tip runner”, according to Parsons – standing outside of Walker-Leawere, the Waratahs had two defenders marking both the forward runner and the tip runner as they expected either the lock or flanker to carry the ball into contact.

What they didn’t see coming, though, was Barrett, who had moved from directly behind the pod to run a line in between Walker-Leawere and Kirifi, acting as a short ball option.

Without having anticipated Barrett’s run, the Waratahs left a gaping hole for the All Blacks star to run through as their only two defenders in the line had already committed themselves to Walker-Leawere and Kirifi.

Walker-Leawere recognised this as he popped the short ball to Barrett, who cantered through the defensive line for a clean break before spreading the ball to the supporting Kirifi, who drew in the covering defence to set Umaga-Jensen up for an easy try.

Parsons said that after two seasons of New Zealand teams playing each other in Super Rugby Aotearoa, Kiwi sides well aware of the threat Barrett poses as a strike weapon with ball in hand.

He suggested the same can’t be said of the Waratahs, who Barrett last played against in round one of 2019 Super Rugby season.

“We’re so used to seeing that as Kiwis and we always mark Jordie to close up that space,” Parsons said.

“The Waratahs didn’t and he busts through and he links with Umaga-Jensen and Umaga-Jensen scores. They’ll get used to these nuances that the Kiwi teams try to play.”

The Waratahs continue their Super Rugby Trans-Tasman season this Saturday when they face off against the Blues at Eden Park in Auckland.

Listen to the latest episode of the Aotearoa Rugby Pod:

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search