Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why the world needs a reverse Lions tour

Cape Town , South Africa - 24 July 2021; South Africa head coach Rassie Erasmus speaks to his players during the first test of the British and Irish Lions tour match between South Africa and British and Irish Lions at Cape Town Stadium in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo By Ashley Vlotman/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

There’s nothing like a British & Irish Lions tour. Since 1888 the so-called Home Nations have set forth to conquer the Antipodes, Argentina and Southern Africa. It’s a rich narrative, one filled with stirring speeches, heroic deeds and a 39.47% winning record across 38 series against the Rugby Championship sides.

ADVERTISEMENT

Critics will call it an anachronism, an out-dated concept born in an imperial and amateur age. Those critics be damned. Rugby is undoubtedly a richer sport for it. Not convinced? Pieter-Steph du Toit, winner of two World Cups, said beating the Lions series was on par with lifting the Webb Ellis Cup.

Jim Telfer, a veteran of two tours as a coach, likened the challenge to climbing Mount Everest. Sam Warburton, a double Six Nations grand-slam champion, said that taking part was the “pinnacle of any player’s career”. There really is nothing else like it.

Video Spacer

NORTH vs SOUTH: Rhys Patchell on the differences he’s seen since playing in NZ

Welsh fly-half Rhys Patchell weighs in on the differences between playing for the Scarlets back home and where he is playing now, with the Highlanders in New Zealand

Video Spacer

NORTH vs SOUTH: Rhys Patchell on the differences he’s seen since playing in NZ

Welsh fly-half Rhys Patchell weighs in on the differences between playing for the Scarlets back home and where he is playing now, with the Highlanders in New Zealand

But what if there was something else? Something that could match the prestige and appeal of a Lions tour and begin to write its own storied tale? What if there was a way that the rugby gods and those who fund them could find a way of gathering the might of the southern hemisphere and unleash it upon Europe every four years?

It would certainly add value. Test rugby demands context and beyond the Rugby Championship and Six Nations there is little of it outside of World Cups and Lions tours. Mid-year series have been reduced to two-Test morsels to accommodate developing nations and end of year tours, now dubbed the Autumn Nations Series to give those games a fabricated gravitas, have lost some of their sheen.

The Springboks and All Blacks have recognised this waning across the board which is why they’re considering playing each other more often. An injection of something new is needed and a Lions-esque tour in the opposite direction would shake up rugby’s landscape.

But when would it take place? The World Cup is sacrosanct and can’t be moved from its four-year cycle. The same applies for the Lions tour which means this new series would have to slot in either side of the World Cup. It couldn’t go in the year before. The 18 month run-in towards the World Cup is paramount for coaches who are fine-tuning their squads.

ADVERTISEMENT

Which means it would have to go in just after; 2028 if we were to get going as soon as possible.

With respect to Ireland’s impending victory, the Six Nations championship immediately after a World Cup is arguably the most forgettable. Even Antoine Dupont couldn’t be bothered with this one. Ditto for the Rugby Championship. No Springboks fan will care one bit if South Africa don’t claim the title and All Blacks supporters will find little consolation in a triumphant campaign. But a homogenous tour of Europe, one that might compel players to stave off retirement for another 12 months to take part in something unique? Now that has marketability written all over it.

So, who would they play? Because there are six teams in the aptly named Six Nations, touring them individually wouldn’t do. That would mean, for example, a visit to England every 24 years. So, in order to make this work, European sides would have to share the load and each play two Tests against the tourists and provide a domestic team for a midweek clash.

As members of the oldest rivalry on the planet, Scotland and England can join forces. Wales and Ireland could unite under a Celtic banner while France and Italy, as representatives of the European mainland, could play together. Remember, this does not mean that these nations would play as one team. Instead they’d play two Tests each against the four-headed beast from the south.

Here’s how that might look: Glasgow Warriors could get us going with a midweek game before a historic first-ever Test at Celtic Park. Edinburgh would have a dip the week after with Murrayfield closing out the Scotland leg of the tour. Next a composite northern England team – coached, of course, by Steve Diamond – would play on the Wednesday night ahead of the first Test against Steve Borthwick’s men at the Etihad Stadium in Manchester.

ADVERTISEMENT

The circus would move south where a Saracens-laden southern England team would provide one final tune-up before the final Test at Twickenham.

Four Tests. Two host nations. One epic month.

Four years later it would be the turn of Wales and Ireland and four years after that we’d head to Italy and France. Some challenges would be easier than others but that is true already for Lions tours. Does anyone actually think that Joe Schmidt’s Wallabies have a chance next year?

The team’s colours would comprise the four representatives with light blue, black, gold and bottle green all mashed together in a Harlequins-style kit. Given there are just two apex predators found at all four locations, the name of this team can be decided by a binary referendum. Are they the Southern Hemisphere Sharks or the Southern Hemisphere Falcons? Personally I prefer the Falcons.

Of course this would create a logistical headache for those tasked with organising the thing. Where would they train before the tour? Would the South African government insist on racially motivated selection targets? Would enough fans from Argentina turn up? Would any All Black loose forward provide the requisite protection for Nic White?

Then there’s the small matter of convincing national boards to relinquish their income. If Siya Kolisi, Beauden Barrett, Rob Valetini and Julian Montoya are in France and Italy, that means all Home Nations would have to make do with a diluted end to the year. This could provide a chance for the Pacific Island Nations, as well as a handful of tier-two teams to fill the gap and raise their standard. But there’d be no doubt certain unions would take a financial hit. Universal buy-in would be required to get this off the ground and that’s only after we’ve agreed on how the revenue will be distributed.

With all those caveats I have no doubt that this would be an incredible addition to the rugby ecosystem. Do I think it will happen? No, of course not. The calendar is already stacked and wedging in something so monstrously complex could cause the game to tear apart at the seams. But, if some administrative genius out there is reading this and likes the idea, it’s all yours.

TEAM SELECTION

Following Warren Gatland’s lead, I’ve selected a squad of 37 with a starting match-day 23 named for the opening Test. A few All Blacks who aren’t technically eligible for New Zealand duty have been included, but those who have formally retired, such as Aaron Smith, aren’t part of the mix.

As the reigning world champions and the number one side in the world, the Springboks dominate with Kolisi captaining the side and Rassie Erasmus taking over as head coach.

Southern Hemisphere Falcons:

15: Beauden Barrett (New Zealand)

14: Will Jordan (New Zealand)

13: Lukhanyo Am (South Africa)

12: Samu Kerevi (Australia)

11: Cheslin Kolbe (South Africa)

10: Richie Mo’Unga (New Zealand)

9: Faf de Klerk (South Africa)

1: Steven Kitshoff (South Africa)

2: Malcolm Marx (South Africa)

3: Frans Malherbe (South Africa)

4: Eben Etzebeth (South Africa)

5: Scott Barrett (New Zealand)

6: Siya Kolisi – captain (South Africa)

7: Pieter-Steph du Toit (South Africa)

8: Ardie Savea (New Zealand)

16: Codie Taylor (New Zealand)

17: Ethan de Groot (New Zealand)

18: Taniela Tupou (Australia)

19: Franco Mostert (South Africa)

20: Rob Valetini (Australia)

21: Finlay Christie (New Zealand)

22: Jordie Barrett (New Zealand)

23: Damian Willemse (South Africa)

Reserves:

Hooker: Julian Montoya (Argentina); Bongi Mbonambi (South Africa)

Prop: Ox Nche (South Africa); Tyrel Lomax (New Zealand)

Second-row: Will Skelton (Australia); RG Snyman (South Africa), Tomas Lavanini (Argentina)

Back-row: Pablo Matera (Argentina); Marcos Kremer (Argentina)

Scrum-half: Nic White (Australia)

Fly-half: Handre Pollard (South Africa)

Centre: Rieko Ioane (New Zealand); Damian de Allende (South Africa)

Utility back: Damian McKenzie (New Zealand).

Head coach: Rassie Erasmus.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

47 Comments
S
Spew_81 296 days ago

A SAANZAR team would be just about unbeatable. The All Blacks and the Springboks would balance each other’s weakness. The Wallabies and Pumas would have a few outstanding players in also. The entire 23 would be stacked.

Imagine a team coached by Razor and Rassie :)

J
Jmann 297 days ago

not quite sure how so many Boks would make it into the backline. A Smith at HB without a doubt. Then the backs would see some ball.

R
Red and White Dynamight 297 days ago

Contrived idea of nonsense. The Boks and All Blacks are immense enough on their own as opposition for NH teams. They have no natural connection to each other except as rivals. Lions are all British, plus Ireland (incl, uniquely, Nthern Ireland). A Pacific Islands XV is similar combination to Lions but not as strong. Boks and ABs seem to get on well after the whistle but in reality their fans hate each other. ABs and Wallabies dont even have that and yet their countries are connected historically as ANZAC’s.

A
Andrew 297 days ago

  1. Daft 2. Touching to see there is soneone who thinks Finlay C will have any kind of test future after the grave error of picking him for the RWC.

P
Pecos 297 days ago

All this silly novelty seeking slicing & dicing is making me dizzy.

P
PDV 297 days ago

Interesting article, although I disagree that Bok supporters won’t care about winning the Rugby Champs. Having proved they are very good at winning World Cups I’d like to see the Boks go on and dominate the next four years.

M
Mitch 297 days ago

A Lions tour that doesn’t turn toxic would be nice too.

f
finn 297 days ago

I think there’s a lot of reasons this wouldn’t work, but if we’re just proposing fun things how about a “World Series” held the june/july following a world cup.

The teams competing each four years would be:

the current world champions
The Pacific Islands
The British & Irish Lions
The World XV
Barbarians FC

to ensure all teams are fairly evenly matched, the current world champions would name their squad first; then The Pacific Islands would name next, and would be able to select any pacific qualified players not selected by the world champions, including players already “captured” by non-pacific nations who would otherwise have been eligible for selection (eg. Bundee Aki); the Lions would select next; and then The World XV and Barbarians FC would be left to fight over anyone not selected.

Some people will point out that 5 teams is too many for a mid-year round robin, particularly as it would be nice to have a final as well; and they would be right! But because we’re just having fun here we’re going to innovate an entirely new format for rugby, where the round robin is played in one stadium over the course of one day, with each game lasting just 40 minutes with no half time or change of ends.

The round robin decides the seedings for the knockouts, which are contested by all 5 teams in one stadium over the course of one day, according to the following schedule:
Knockout Round 1: seed 5 v seed 4 (contested over 1 half of indetermined length, finishing when one team reaches 7 points)
~ 10 minute break ~
Quarter Final: winner of Round 1 v seed 3 (contested over 1 half of indetermined length, finishing when one team reaches 7 points)
~ 10 minute break ~
Semi Final: winner of Quarter Final v seed 2 (contested over 1 half of indetermined length, finishing when one team reaches 7 points)
~ 10 minute break ~
Final: winner of Semi Final v seed 1 (played as a standard 80 minute rugby match)

for the round robin, teams would name a 15 man starting lineup and a 16 man bench. Substitutions during games can only be made for injuries, but any number of substitutions can be made between games. The same rules apply for the finals, except that we return to having a regular 8 man bench, and would allow substitutions as normal during the 80 minute final.

N
Nuno 297 days ago

Nice idea, but would require some fine tuning. The name first of all is terrible. How about “The Southern Cross Braves”. Also stick to single nation 3 Tests and 3 Club matches. 2 Nations I believe would dilute it. I love this idea and I believe it could work

C
Chris 297 days ago

Lmao, 🤣 we would definitely have a better record than 39% . I think the North would be too scared of this team 😂

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search