Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why there isn’t 'mass panic' at London Irish - Andy Goode

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

It’s not good at all that players and staff at London Irish are reportedly yet to be paid their April wages but people should be careful likening this to the Worcester saga. The current financial climate in English rugby and the clamour for headlines mean that phrases like ‘financial meltdown’ are being bandied about and it is being suggested that they could go bust – but that isn’t what I’m hearing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Any deal of this magnitude is difficult to conclude. There are so many fine details to iron out before everything is in place. Of course, it could still fall through but people are rushing to judgement because of everything that has happened elsewhere already this season.

The optics aren’t good when the takeover has already been protracted and has been talked about for a number of weeks and then somebody suggests that the delay with the wages is because of the bank holiday, yet payment still hadn’t gone through on Wednesday morning.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Indeed, it isn’t just optics and the reality of that situation will have made life very difficult for a lot of people at the club who have outgoings at the start of the month and will be struggling to make ends meet during the delay.

However, there is a big leap from that to claiming that the Exiles are on a financial precipice and are about to go under imminently, so a bit of balance wouldn’t go amiss.

Related

Having spoken to people at Irish, I know there have been regular meetings with representatives of the US consortium that is attempting to complete the takeover and fingers crossed they are as good as their word. You can understand why people would worry when you factor in what missed payrolls led to at Worcester and the mistruths that were told there, but every situation is different and this one could yet turn out to be very positive for London Irish.

They have been brilliant on the pitch this season, have an excellent training complex at Hazelwood and a top-class academy – all ingredients that are clearly very attractive to potential investors.

ADVERTISEMENT

The fact that they don’t own their own stadium is negative and there were rumours recently about a long-term ground share with AFC Wimbledon as opposed to the current deal to play at Brentford’s Gtech Community Stadium.

That would be something that you could envisage being tricky to iron out for the consortium but it’s imperative that the club is able to keep what they generate on match days or it will likely be getting into more and more debt all the time.

Due diligence also has to be done on both sides and the RFU, who have contacted Irish to seek reassurance that staff and players will receive wages imminently, will be conducting their fit and proper owners’ test but Premiership Rugby seem confident that everything will be okay.

“I do think it’s different (to the situations at Worcester and Wasps),” chief executive Simon Massie-Taylor told BBC Radio 5 Live. “Between Premiership Rugby and the RFU, we have been engaged for quite a while with both the current ownership and the future buyers and there are lots of very positive signals coming from both sides.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s been reported that the new ownership have been in front of the players and the staff last week and today [Tuesday], which is a positive signal of their intent. And if it comes off then clearly you have got a new breed of investor. They are from across the pond and they have got interest in other sports, so it is a positive news story.”

Deals like this always take longer than anticipated to get over the line. The US consortium wanted to have everything signed, sealed and delivered by the end of April, which clearly hasn’t happened, so there is now an amount to cover in the meantime.

Related

It’s abundantly clear that the financial situation at most Premiership clubs isn’t great at the moment but Irish do not have HMRC chasing them – as Worcester and Wasps did – and there is a big difference between a deal taking a frustrating amount of time to be concluded and them going to the wall.

Hopefully, the good news of a done deal and a few details will be just around the corner, with the April wages also landing in bank accounts imminently, and the headlines of the last day or two will be tomorrow’s fish and chip paper.

Only time will tell whether it does get over the line and Exiles fans can start looking forward to a potentially even brighter future, but the word from inside the camp is that there isn’t mass panic about the situation. Far from it.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
A
Alan 597 days ago

This is a big deal. They'll be in breach of pension law and probably late with HMRC payments as well. The RFU should be taking sanctions - deducting points etc. But they'll sweep it under the carpet as ever.

M
Michele 598 days ago

I hope you're right - nice to see this more positive analysis. I would love (and am waiting to see) a Rugby Pass article about the RFU's $50 million debt. Thanks!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search