Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Why wasn't Malcolm Marx out there?': Kiwi pundits question Boks selections

Malcolm Marx of South Africa during The Rugby Championship match between South Africa and New Zealand at Mbombela Stadium on August 06, 2022 in Nelspruit, South Africa. (Photo by Dirk Kotze/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

New Zealand pundits have questioned the decision to bench star hooker Malcolm Marx for the second test against the All Blacks after their defeat in Johannesburg.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 50-cap Springbok was influential last week at disrupting the breakdown coming up with three critical turnovers that disrupted the All Blacks ball.

With regular hooker Bongi Mbonambi also out injured, the Springboks gave the start to Joseph Dweba who was playing just his third test match.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Former Blues and Leinster midfielder Isa Nacewa said on Sky Sport NZ’s The Breakdown that the surprising decision likely came back to South Africa’s quota system.

“Why wasn’t Malcolm Marx out there from the get go? This probably goes back to the quota system that they have,” Nacewa told The Breakdown.

“Bongi Mbonambi got injured but how do you not have Marx on the field? His impact came immediately when he got on the field.

“It is a pretty intricate and condeluded system they have, probably second-to-none in the world around how the actually select there team.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They know very early on in the week when the team is named and there is a rigour-more with process that actually goes through that.

“But someone like Malcolm Marx and the influence that he has, you have got to have him on the field.”

Dweba’s shaky start included a miscue at the lineout with his first throw pinched just moments into the game after an All Blacks error sent the ball into touch.

After the Springboks failed to gain total ascendency at the scrum, Dweba was substituted half an hour into the game for Marx while starting props Ox Nche and Frans Malherbe were benched shortly afterward as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Springboks head coach Jacques Nienaber explained the call to pull Dweba as ‘privileged’ information but did say there is always a rugby reason behind the substitutions.

With a 6-2 bench split, he said they have the players to utillise and will always make the decision if they feel the job is done or not being done to a standard required.

“There’s always a reason – a rugby reason why we did that, but that’s privileged,” Nienaber said.

“The players all know [the reason]. Every single player knows why we went that route and there’s a very logical reason why we did that.”

“Like I’ve said before, players have a specific job to do and the moment they’ve done their job or they’re not doing their job anymore, that’s when we take them off.”

“The moment we see a drop in that, because we have six forwards on the bench, we will do the substitution.

“And I think that’s where we differ from other teams. We do things a little bit differently.”

On the other side the All Blacks rolled the dice with a younger front row that stood up and held their own, bringing in two new starting props from the side that lost in Mbombela.

Ethan de Groot at loosehead was playing his sixth test, hooker Samisoni Taukei’aho had 12 tests and tighthead Tyrel Lomax had 15 tests before Saturday’s match. Young Crusaders prop Fletcher Newell made his test debut from the bench.

The inexperienced front row unit was praised by captain Sam Cane and head coach Ian Foster for their performances.

“For those guys to start in that test match, without a doubt the biggest test that they’ve had in their careers,” Cane said.

“To perform the way they did was awesome. I’m really stoked for those guys, it makes for some really healthy competition going forward.”

Foster said the team has been working hard to fix their set-piece which he revealed has been a problem for five seasons

“You have to play well in that space. And to be honest, it’s probably been our Achilles heel in recent years going back to 2018 when it started,” Foster said.

“We’ve been working hard in that space. There was some new players in that space that were pretty special. Ethan de Groot is not brand new but I was really proud of his game today.

“Tyrel Lomax, first start in a big test for him and the likes of a Fletcher Newell, a superb young man, what a place to play your debut.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
F
Fil 859 days ago

Marx was needed from the start, not a c-grade rookie

S
Silk 859 days ago

I agree with the comments. Wrong team selections cost the Boks. But it is not all doom and gloom. From 30min in to 68 min the Boks scored 23-6. It shows that they can still dominate the All Blacks.
Stupid decisions by the scrumhalves cost the Boks the game in the last 12 min.
Well done to the All Blacks. Good to see you back.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

158 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Initial Immanuel Feyi-Waboso injury update does not sound promising Initial Immanuel Feyi-Waboso injury update does not sound promising
Search