Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Why would you leave Munster for this?' - Fitzgerald captures Bath misery

(Photo by David Davies/PA Images via Getty Images)

Former Ireland wing Luke Fitzgerald posted a particular germane Tweet as Leinster tore apart a hapless Bath side apart at The Rec.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Why would you leave Munster for this?” as he watched the Heineken Champions Cup massacre.

Despite a decent start by Bath, the Leinster machine soon overpowered their hosts; the scoreboard rocketing upwards at an alarming rate 20 minutes either side of halftime.

Video Spacer

Rob Kearney and Alfie Barbeary – A Lion and a Wasp | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 17

Video Spacer

Rob Kearney and Alfie Barbeary – A Lion and a Wasp | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 17

The men in blue had bagged 50 points by the 50th-minute mark and the game was effectively put to bed as a contest. It ended up 64 – 7 to the URC champions.

Fitzgerald, himself a former Leinsterman, was of course referencing the departure of Munster head coach Johann van Graan to Bath next season. The South African is using a clause in his contract to exit Limerick, where his tenure as head coach has more ticked along than caught fire.

Still, his exit ruffled feathers and many want him to depart the province sooner rather than later.

Some pointed to the most obvious answer to Fitzgerald’s rhetorical question.

Money.

Van Graan is likely to have earned a significant increase in his salary. Bath were desperate to get a name in, with the current coaching ticket not doing the business despite a competitive squad, a fix is badly needed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Backed by multi-millionaire Bruce Craig, it’s a fair bet Van Graan’s bank balance will do well out of the move.

In fairness to Bath fans, a full house turned out for the show, despite the men in blue, black and white winning just one game this season to date. Naturally, patience is running thin.

https://twitter.com/c_pollendine/status/1484905826162724878

It’s probably worth pointing out that Munster’s current game plan hasn’t exactly been lauded under Van Graan of late. Former Munster flyhalf Ronan O’Gara described the style as boring, Springbok-esque fare.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This can’t be what Munster rugby supporters want to see, surely?,” wrote O’Gara after watching his former side edge past Ulster in a dogged 18 – 13 win over Ulster in Thomond Park earlier this month. “I’d understand to a degree if, like the Springboks, this was delivering winning rugby and trophies, but Munster never looked to play the ball into the fifteens at any stage…

“It was like watching rugby from a bygone era… I respect every coaching philosophy and if that is the vision of Munster’s management, you admire it to a point, but it must be pretty restrictive to play that kind of way. Munster’s South African ethos is summed up thus: Maul. Box Kick. Aerial Contest. Play if you win it, defend if you don’t…”

Things can surely only get better for Bath. Surely?

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search