Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Will Bath's £100,000-plus signing of Redpath spark a contract buy-out trend in recruitment?

(Photo by Luke Walker/Getty Images)

Although Cameron Redpath isn’t a household name in rugby just yet, his move to Bath earlier this week has created plenty of ripples in the professional game.

ADVERTISEMENT

Not only was it a mid-season move – which is rare in itself – but with Redpath having signed a five-year deal with Sale Sharks fresh out of Sedbergh school in 2018, there was still three-and-a-half years of his deal that Bath had to negotiate a buy-out of.

The inside centre has been highly-touted for a number of years now and after starring for the England U18s side, he was selected to tour South Africa with the seniors the summer he left Sedbergh. His hopes of an early debut were scuppered, however, by an injury that ultimately led to him having to have an ACL reconstruction.

Contract buy-out isn’t unheard of as Mako Vunipola made a similar move from Bristol Bears to Saracens in 2011, although his contract in the south-west was significantly shorter than Redpath’s at Sale which resulted in a much smaller compensation figure.

RugbyPass understands the figure for Redpath’s release to be significantly above £100k. It’s a sizeable sum for Bath to part with and a relatively high figure for rugby union. It shows the faith that the club have in Redpath as a Bath player.

(Continue reading below…)

Springboks’ future at the heart of the latest CVC investment

Video Spacer

With clubs beginning to tie down young players on longer term deals, such as Sale did with Redpath, the opportunities for rival clubs to snap up exciting prospects at the end of their contracts will lessen.

Instead of youngsters signing one- or two-year deals and having limited time to prove their worth, a talented player in the second or third year of his five-year deal will be able to negotiate a new contract with his current club months or even years before rival sides are allowed to talk to him.

ADVERTISEMENT

As such, aggressive clubs who have the salary cap space could more regularly start targeting youngsters at other clubs, particularly those who are struggling to break into their respective senior XVs. In addition to that, the current Premiership salary cap regulations state that transfer fees and/or compensation payments to other clubs do not count towards the salary cap.

At the least, these two factors should put other clubs on notice that teams will become less afraid of taking these kind of risks, particularly if they have an owner or ownership group who are willing to bankroll the moves and are looking for a competitive edge in a salary cap league.

For agents, there’s a win-win scenario here whereby not only do they move a younger player to a new club with the hope that more playing time awaits, they will also likely see that player sign a contract on improved terms from their previous deal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Agents fees are often at a higher percentage when a player is moving to a new club as opposed to when they are extending their contract at their current one, and though that won’t be decisive for most agents in their decision to encourage their clients to move, it’s a perk that won’t be ignored either.

If the Redpath acquisition proves to be as successful as Saracens’ signing of Vunipola, the chances of this sort of move happening more often in the future are only going to increase, and it will at least encourage clubs to invest accordingly in their talent identification departments.

Clubs can be guilty of becoming locked in on one particular pathway, or perhaps a handful of favoured schools within their academy region, so any development in the game that brings a fresh approach to the process of recruitment and encourages clubs to think outside of the box, is a refreshing one.

WATCH: Officials in the firing line after England’s win over Ireland

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search