Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Will Skelton's loyalty to Wallabies shouldn't discount him from selection

Will Skelton of Australia looks on during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between Australia and Georgia at Stade de France on September 09, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

The Wallabies are building a good foundation under Joe Schmidt, but it’s clear they are lacking world class talent.

ADVERTISEMENT

As few as three players could be considered world class in the Wallabies squad, a point which garners more attention as the British and Irish Lions series draws nearer.

Although the Wallabies’ upcoming Grand Slam tour of the Northern Hemisphere is the imminent challenge, make no mistake, for Schmidt, the Lions tour is the only yard stick.

While tough opposition await in the coming months, Schmidt will be doing all he can to get his men ready and across his gameplan for the series next year.

The gameplan is one half of the equation and the players who will execute the strategy is the other.

While Test-level depth is short in a few positions, Schmidt has a world class talent ready to be called upon at tighthead lock; enter Will Skelton.

At 145kg and 203cm, he’s big even by Test standards and he has a winner’s credentials, having won his fair share of silverware with his French club La Rochelle.

ADVERTISEMENT

The giant lock appears to be just what the Wallabies need but there is controversy surrounding his selection.

Some of his detractors question his ability to make a difference at Test level, others question his commitment to the Wallabies.

Regarding his form: his success with La Rochelle over the years and the fact the wealthy club has extended his contract until 2028, is proof enough of his value on the rugby pitch.

The Top 14 is the most competitive and attritional club competition in the world.

ADVERTISEMENT

His form in a competition which is longer and played at a higher level than Super Rugby Pacific should settle all debate as to whether he is ‘good enough’ for the Wallabies set-up, not to mention his experience as well as unique talents.

The question about his ‘loyalty’ to the Wallabies and Australia was not helped by his contract extension with La Rochelle.

Especially considering he could have returned to Australia ahead of the home World Cup in 2027 as his old contract with the club was set to run-out at the end of 2025.

The issue comes down to whether people want only domestic talent in the Wallabies or the best talent and make no mistake; Skelton is the best Australia-eligible tighthead lock going around.

When he can play for the Wallabies is governed by World Rugby’s regulation 9, where clubs are obliged to release international players in specific windows during the year.

Fixture
Internationals
England
37 - 42
Full-time
Australia
All Stats and Data

It also comes down to a myriad of factors: what La Rochelle want, what the Wallabies are prepared to pay/do, whether he wants to play and whether his body can cope.

Skelton was available for the Rugby Championship but Schmidt decided against it, likely due to his long season, and Schmidt’s desire to mould his domestic playing group.

Money on Rugby Australia’s behalf may also have been a discussion point.

Similarly, while clubs must comply with the release or face penalties under reg 9, it doesn’t stop clubs from disincentivising players from playing for their national sides.

Clubs pay top dollar for their talent and don’t want to risk their marquee players.

Skelton has spoken to the media about the Wallabies’ upcoming end of year tour and has indicated he wants to play.

“Joe hasn’t said for definite if I’m selected,” Skelton told AFP.

“He’s just asked if I’m keen and if I’m in form, playing well, I’m in with a chance… I’ve not been coached under Joe so that would be pretty cool if I’m involved to work under a guy like him.”

“Hopefully then I get picked for what will be three games. It’s a four game series but it’s only three Tests in the window.

Should he play for the Wallabies, his role will be vital.

Skelton brings size, weight, and a mauling ability none of the Wallaby locks have.

The uniqueness of his build could alleviate pressure off a Wallabies side which is lacking in big ball carrying backs, meaning it relies heavily on the forward pack for gainline carries.

This is particularly pertinent, considering Schmidt’s attack shapes are narrow and attritional, something which suits Skelton perfectly.

Skelton would be joining a solid but thin locking stock under Schmidt.

Related

Jeremy Williams is the only debutant lock to prove he’s ready for the rigours of Test-match rugby, while other debutants Angus Blyth and Josh Canham failed to step-up.

At 113kgs and 198cm he’s the smallest of all the locks used by Schmidt, by a couple centimetres and several kilos.

Whilst size isn’t everything, it is defining factor in a side which is struggling to get over the gainline.

Skelton’s inclusion could get the best out of Williams as a backrow-second row hybrid as well as assist the Wallabies overall.

Skelton would ratchet-up the competition for gameday selection and share some of Lukhan Salakaia-Loto’s load as a key ball carrier.

While Skelton would help in the loose, he would also prove pivotal at set-piece.

Skelton is a proven maul threat on either side of the ball.

While the Wallabies have made big strides in this area, they have leaked big points from their maul and have been unable to make their own maul a weapon.

However, it’s imperative the Wallabies continue their good work because Skelton must be an augment, not a solution to their maul woes.

Skelton’s ballast at scrum time behind Taniela Tupou will cause havoc for any scrum they will face on the tour.

Schmidt’s preferred matchday-23 is firming-up, but it’s clear where reinforcements are needed, and it’s evident the domestic lock options have not cut the mustard.

Whether you’re a Skelton fan or detractor, it is clear to see he adds experience and bulk to a side which is lacking in both.

Schmidt has been biding his time, trying to build a foundation to his squad, so when he adds the cream, ergo Skelton, the core group of players can allow the x-factor talent to shine, as opposed to getting bogged down in the basics.

Skelton can help get the Wallabies over the gainline, stop the haemorrhaging at maul time and lead this side, in what is going to be a very tough tour.

What Skelton can’t do however is bring with him a preconceived way about how he is going to be a Wallaby.

This three-game window is vital, it looms as Skelton’s British and Irish Lions series audition.

Skelton’s challenge is this: to learn Schmidt-ball in three games, which his Wallaby teammates have so far not perfected in nine.

Skelton must resign himself completely to Schmidt’s; ideology, workrate, discipline, and tactics, for he has chosen to stay abroad.

So, should Skelton accept Schmidt’s Wallaby invitation, he must accept and relish the steep learning curve that awaits him.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
T
Terry24 37 days ago

"Although the Wallabies’ upcoming Grand Slam tour of the Northern Hemisphere is the imminent challenge, make no mistake, for Schmidt, the Lions tour is the only yard stick."


Don't agree. Jones wrecking of Australia combined with the new RWC pool structure has changed the dynamic.


If Australia are in the Top 6 for the RWC 2027 draw then they are in Band 1 for the draw and avoid a 'heavy' (IRL/SA/FRA/NZ/ENG etc) in their pool. With a greater chance then of winning a pool and further avoiding a heavy in the 1/8 final and until at least the QF. By contrast: If Australia fail to make the top 6 then they are in Band 2; they get a heavy in their Pool and unles they can win that pool they are getting another heavy in the 1/8 final.


The difference between being inside the top 6 and outside for the draw is major: having to play two top 6 teams before the QF compared to avoiding it. Schmidt cannot ignore that. Australia need that top #6 position come draw time.

P
Perthstayer 37 days ago

Very happy to see Williams made a couple of 1 or 2 metre gainline busts in tight play in 2H of 2nd Bled. His attitude is worth a few kg.

Rodda lifted Williams' quality and I recon Skelton would do likewise.

A
AllyOz 38 days ago

I thought he made a difference when he came in during the 2023 campaign. His French club might play a different style to what Schmidt wants to play but I think Schmidt and ROG hold some similar views on the game. We might need to make some changes at lineout etc to accommodate him but I think it's all doable. I reckon its worth a go on the November tour, just to see how it could work. It sounds like he would make himself available for the Lions tour and he might not make it to the next RWC but that is still a long way off. I think he would bring a real point of difference.

C
Cheers 38 days ago

New Zealander Will Skelton

O
OJohn 37 days ago

Bit like all those Aussies playing for the All Blacks I guess

P
Perthstayer 37 days ago

Grow up

A
AllyOz 38 days ago

Technically true, he was born in NZ, but he moved to Australia when he was 10.

O
OJohn 38 days ago

"The Wallabies are building a good foundation under Joe Schmidt, but it’s clear they are lacking world class talent.


Sorry John but this is utter tripe. You need to try harder.

C
CR 38 days ago

I don’t see the point of picking him. He’s overrated and he hardly ever plays with his French commitments.

A
Ardy 38 days ago

OMG, have you no idea what a world class lock looks like? Skelton is possibly, if not the #1 then definitely in the top 3 locks in the world.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

286 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat
Search