Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Winners and losers from this weekend's World Cup warm-ups

Rhys Patchell talks tactics with reserve halfback Tomos Williams. (Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

After this weekend’s round of games, most of the 31-man squads for Japan will be finalised. Ireland will not announce theirs for another week but Joe Schmidt and his team will have determined the selections. These games, then were a last chance for fringe players and bolters to play their way onto the plane.

ADVERTISEMENT

We take a look at the winners and losers from Georgia v Scotland and Wales v Ireland.

Winner: Attacking fly-half play

Rhys Patchell and Jack Carty probably played themselves into seats on their respective plane while Finn Russell showed some of his best tricks against a Georgian defence that couldn’t handle him. Creative kicks, flat passing,and some lovely running were all on display at times across the two games and while there were also errors at times, it generally made for enjoyable viewing.

Loser: Jarrod Evans and Ross Byrne

Before the match, Warren Gatland had said it was a straight shootout between Evans and Patchell to go to Japan alongside experienced fly-half Dan Biggar. Evans got the first chance and he fumbled his lines, struggling to make an impact against a physically dominant Irish side, missing some easy kicks at goal and to touch. Ireland’s dominance didn’t stop Patchell when he came on so Evans will probably have to wait for his time. The hammering Ireland took at the hands of England last weekend wasn’t Byrne’s fault but it seems unlikely he will be Schmidt’s third No. 10 now, after Carty’s performance.

Winner: Georgian rugby

Neither the attendance nor the scoreline were what they would have wanted but this was the first visit to Georgia from a Tier 1 side. Other Tier 2 teams have regularly spoken about how important regular competition from better sides is for the development and their finances so this game was more important than the result. Hopefully, there will be more games like it – maybe even with different results 

Loser: Georgia

There’s no getting around it, Georgia were poor. They were too keen at the breakdown, too one-dimensional in attack, and too limited in defence. Their famed forwards didn’t have the impact expected in the scrums or mauls and this was generally a game where brain very much had the upper hand over brawn. Karlen Asieshvili gave the home fans a try in the 58th minute but that was really the only comfort in an underwhelming showing.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Winner: Andrew Porter

The tighthead has been showing his ability on the other side of the scrum in these warm-up games, guaranteeing he will play in Japan unless injury strikes. He gave Leon Brown a rough time from the loosehead when he came on in the second half, causing his opposite number to concede two penalties and a yellow card, before continuing to bother the more experienced Samson Lee. Porter may find himself starting in the No. 1 jersey if he keeps this up.

Loser: Fairytale send-offs

It’s rare that players and coaches get the perfect send-off in their final home games and Gatland has proved to be no exception. The arch-pragmatist won’t care about the result or the send-off, as Wales came through the match with no injury concerns and their back-up fly-half dilemma seemingly solved. Given everything he has achieved with Wales, however, it seemed a shame. Perhaps he will get a fairytale return in the autumn instead, as he coaches the Barbarians against Wales.

Winner: Fringe players 

There were a number of players who knew this was their chance to make an impression before squad selections and many stepped up. Rory Hutchinson bagged a brace and may have played well enough to no longer be considered a fringe player, despite Scotland’s growing depth at centre. Owen Lane and Hallam Amos were bright spots in a generally poor performance from Wales, with the former scoring a try on his debut. Gatland will probably only take one of the two, however. Will Addison was excellent for Ireland before going off and his creativity may see him make the squad.

Loser: Fringe players 

On the other hand, some fringe players will have done their chances of a world cup place serious harm, especially in the Wales side. Steff Evans had a very poor season but Gatland gave him a chance to show his attacking potential and he didn’t take it. Owen Watkin gave possibly his worst performance for Wales and it may be that Scott Williams will now go to his third world cup. Brown’s difficulties against a loosehead playing out of position will probably see him out. For Ireland, Dave Kearney didn’t show enough to justify being selected over the other options.

Winner: The starting Scottish forwards

The game against Georgia was billed as a huge test for Scotland’s forwards against the renowned Georgian scrummagers. The scrums were generally frustrating but Scotland would probably have taken that. Elsewhere, their maul was excellent in attack and defence, while both Ben Toolis and Scott Cummings picked up tries from the second row. A bulked-up Matt Fagerson did some solid work at the back of the pack, carrying well and showing his ball-handling ability too. In a game where a lot of the focus was on the Scottish backs, the forwards proved they could stand up against a big side. Their replacements had far less of an impact, however, with the exception of Cummings.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NH 1 hour ago
'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

17 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The RugbyPass team of the World Rugby U20 Championship The RugbyPass team of the World Rugby U20 Championship