Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Women's Lions: A roar of approval

Hannah Botterman of England goes into contact against Wales during the Women's Six Nations match between England and Wales at Twickenham Stoop on March 07, 2020 in London, England. (Photo by Luke Walker/Getty Images for Harlequins FC)

Pulling on a Lions jersey has been one of the greatest honours in the men’s game since 1891. Sports marketing agency Two Circles were last week appointed to undertake a study on the feasibility of emulating this honour for a Women’s Lions Tour scheduled for 2026.

ADVERTISEMENT

England Red Rose scrum-half Claudia MacDonald states that a Women’s Lions would represent ‘a huge opportunity for players to compete against each other for a shirt, and then play amongst and against the best’. It’s certainly a chance for the home nations to create a lasting legacy in the women’s game. MacDonald agrees, going on to say that a Women’s Lions Tour would ‘truly show how far we have come, from the women who first fought for club rugby and our national teams, our own World Cup, everything. Women’s rugby has written its own story, and a Women’s Lions would show respect for that story’.

If a 38 player Women’s Lions squad were selected this year, it would be a broadly English affair. This reflects limited resources available to players outside England rather than lack of talent. Domestic leagues of other home nations lag behind the Allianz Premier 15s, in which the majority of the teams boast a contingent of full-time athletes despite the limiting salary cap. Many Welsh players cross the border to play for Bristol, Gloucester and Exeter, exchanging quality game time for the fatigue of travel.

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

Wales’ recent announcement of twelve full time contracts is a solid start from a national perspective, but it will likely be several years before the benefits of fledgling professionalism appear on the pitch. Ireland currently have no centrally contracted XVs team members, whilst Scotland’s provision for contracted players is patchy at best, meaning athletes are working or studying alongside the demands of training. For a truly representative Lions, all home nations must be well on the way to full-time squads. This may be an area for the Lions to help with, either through direct funding or structural support.

Now we must consider the Lions opposition. Blindly following the men’s blueprint is not a recipe for compelling viewing. South Africa women currently languish in 13th place in world rankings with no substantial moves toward professionalism. A solution could be keeping the four-year cycle without fixed opposition – this would allow the Tour to grow organically and for the Women’s Lions to have the flexibility to choose the most competitive opposition.

The World Cup played in New Zealand later this year should indicate which nations may be up to the task of the inaugural Tour. The Black Ferns (ranked second in the world) suffered resounding defeat in their recent test series against the Red Roses culminating in a 56 – 15 loss at Franklins Gardens. It’s hard to imagine the fifth placed Wallaroos would fare much better, with captain Grace Hamilton suggesting ‘it may be tough down here to put a strong opposition out’. However, this may be a different story come 2026 –  the Black Ferns have recently announced a full time paid squad,  and it’s likely that the Wallaroos will follow suit.

Perhaps an interesting proposition is a combined Tour of Australia and New Zealand.  This type of Tour would provide a bigger pool of high quality opposition from the top ends of both countries’ domestic leagues. A Southern Hemisphere Barbarians-style warm up match could also be a crowd pleaser. Hamilton notes that ‘a combined tour would be a great thing…I would hope that in the next four years Australia will support our women more to lift the standard’.

ADVERTISEMENT

For future iterations, a combined USA/Canada tour would also make for interesting viewing – you need only look at USA captain Kate Zackary’s recent solo try and Alev Kelter’s performances in the league to know that the talent is there in the Eagles squad.

In terms of commercial practicality, opportunities for a Women’s Lions are considerable. Women’s sport achieved a record British audience of 33 million last year, with 600,000 viewers tuning in for the 2021 Six Nations clash between England and France. A documentary along the lines of Living With Lions could draw out the biggest personalities in the game, which would in turn drive sponsorship.

Research by the Women’s Sports Trust indicates that interest in female athletes is driving sport in general, led by player star-power. Giving players such as Shaunagh Brown and Meg Jones bigger platforms will in turn generate greater interest, following and therefore revenue.

Women’s rugby is experiencing exponential growth on and off the field. A well thought out Lions Tour could catapult the women’s game into the fully professional era and create an interminable legacy.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search