Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Women's rugby has moved on, even if some people's perceptions haven't

PA

This week, the draw was announced for Women’s Rugby World Cup 2021, which will start in September 2021 in New Zealand.

ADVERTISEMENT

If I could have chosen the draw myself, it wouldn’t be too different from the one that was drawn by New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Arden, and Rugby World Cup winners Melodie Robinson, Dr Farah Palmer and Dan Carter. Each group has a major competition in it: Group A has New Zealand and Australia, Group B has USA and Canada, and Group C has England and France. In each group, it will be hard for others to compete to reach the finals.

Those who finished in the top seven at Rugby World Cup 2017 in Ireland automatically qualified for next year’s tournament. That means New Zealand, England, France, USA, Canada, Australia and Wales have all confirmed their places at the tournament.

Video Spacer

FULL DOCUMENTARY: Going Pro – Saracens Women

Video Spacer

FULL DOCUMENTARY: Going Pro – Saracens Women

Fiji qualified for their first women’s Rugby World Cup by beating Samoa in the final of the Oceania Rugby Women’s Championship. Similarly, South Africa qualified by winning the Rugby Africa Women’s Cup, beating Kenya 39-0 in the final.

The remaining three teams have yet to be confirmed. Two places will be filled by a qualifier from Asia and Europe, with the final place going to the winner of the new Final Qualification Tournament, which offers a second opportunity for teams to qualify.

Rugby World Cup 2021 will give women’s rugby a platform it has never seen before, and I am confident that the sport is at a place now where it attracts men’s rugby fans too. Stuart Barnes recently wrote a piece in The Times titled ‘I’m not qualified to comment on women’s rugby – yet’. It was an article that, in fact, could have stopped at the headline, but he did explain that for him, women’s rugby is tarnished by its humble beginnings. There will be some with a similar view, who haven’t watched women’s rugby for years and still envisage the level the game was at decades ago.

But gone are the days where to watch international women’s rugby you had to stream it online off a dodgy link. England v France was on BBC 2 on consecutive Saturdays. Most games are easily accessible if you are interested enough. This is frustrating for the players too, as England players Zoe Harrison and Sarah McKenna told RugbyPass.

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s not to say I think every game of women’s rugby is a triumph for the supporter. It’s not. There is often little competition between teams, and the Six Nations has become woefully predictable. Barnes, I agree with you there. Women’s rugby won’t be a true success until there is better competition between the sides.

But that competition cannot come until more unions invest in women’s rugby. England, having 28 players on full-time central contracts, has a clear advantage over the other Home Nations, who are mostly ‘amateur’ athletes. Let’s be clear though, this simply means they aren’t paid to play for their country, every other part of how they play is professional. I use the word ‘amateur’ not as a remark on the level the other nations play – but more with a side eye at the unions that fail to adequately invest in women’s rugby.

Take Wales as an example here, where most players play their club rugby in the Allianz Premier 15s across the border in England. What could be more professional than working all day, some as emergency workers, driving two hours or more to train for your club, driving home, and doing the same the next day?

Women’s Six Nations
Claire Molloy of Ireland steps inside Sara Tounesi of Italy during the Women’s Six Nations Rugby Championship match between Ireland and Italy at Energia Park in Dublin. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)
ADVERTISEMENT

A few weeks ago, I spoke to recently departed Wales Women head coach Darren Edwards, who couldn’t believe the sacrifices the Wales players make to play for their country. There is some promise from the Welsh Rugby Union of contracts in the future, based on performance. New head coach Warren Abrahams will be hoping to lead the Wales women to achieve this.

Yet Wales, Scotland, Ireland, France and Italy had the final three games of the Women’s Six Nations tournament cancelled, due to the coronavirus pandemic. A statement from Six Nations Rugby said: “Recent Government and Health Authority restrictions affecting squad preparations, travel, and the inability to stage matches due to the sport’s amateur status have made the successful completion of the 2020 Championship impossible.”

Yes, these games wouldn’t have affected the outcome, England won the Grand Slam, but the other players had been training towards those matches. We are less than one year out from the Rugby World Cup, and I worry for our Home Nations, who will face another tournament without professional status.

Other Rugby World Cup qualifiers were cancelled too, which were due to take place in December. These will be postponed until it is safe for international fixtures to take place.

England deserve every success they have, and let’s not forget that it was only in 2008 that they were even allowed to wear the red rose that has now become their trademark, and only 2012 when they were given an office inside Twickenham Stadium. As Fiona Tomas reported this week, England Women’s team base used to be a couple of portacabins in the Twickenham car park.

England are the number one team in the world, holding on to that title this week in their narrow win against France. It was a nail-biting game that ended with Emily Scarratt kicking a penalty to win the game 25-23. It highlighted just how exciting women’s rugby can be. Fierce competition, aggressive play, and a high level of skill.

Wallaroos Women's rugby
The Wallaeroos batle the Black Ferns

Every England player I’ve spoken to wants the other Home Nations to become professional, because many of them remember what it was like before they had contracts. Katy Daley-McLean, who this Saturday became the third most capped England international rugby player, remembers what it was like to have to work as a teacher the day after a major international match.

That’s the reality for many players still. I spoke to a few players last year about the sacrifices they make to play in the Six Nations, and the main jealousy wasn’t the pay, but it was being able to rest the day after a game and not have to go to work.

Next year, many will use their entire year’s annual leave allowance to play in the Rugby World Cup.

If you have written off women’s rugby, I have just under a year to encourage you to watch Rugby World Cup 2021. I’ll cover the issues off the pitch that make the game so unique and interesting, and worth your attention. Not only will Rugby World Cup 2021 be a fantastic tournament in its own right, I urge you to get behind the players, who consistently prove their professionalism.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 1 hour ago
South Africa will beat England at a canter

You forget that this was the 3rd Test between the AB's and the English this year. They were prepared and they knew how to keep NZ quiet. The Boks is not NZ.


The Boks is a whole other level. You overestimate England and underestimate the Boks. Clearly you haven't really looked at the teams. Besides the Irish games earlier this year, the Boks have mainly used experimental sides, even against the AB's.


Now they have chosen their best team available. They have targeted this game. The Boks mean business. Man for man, this Bok team is better. In strategy and player abilities there is no comparison and they are outmatched.


There isn't just monster strength, but unreal speed. In broken play there is currently no better team as well as defensively, not to even talk about the attacking threat, both from front and the back.


I'd say read between the lines, see what everyone is seeing, but clearly you are wearing blinders and is also putting too much emphasis on an AB's team the Boks beat twice this year, the same AB's that beaten England 3 times this year.


When Rassie gets serious, the players become machines. There is no stopping them. That bench is loaded with players that is fast, strong and have exceptional skills. This is a team not many teams will face before the 2027 WC, because the Boks doesn't use their best between WC's in one game. All experimental.


You will be proven wrong on Saturday and then you will wonder how you could have been so wrong. This Bok team means serious business. They came to conquer and not just by a close score. They want to demolish and they will. This England team at most is a 60 min team. Against the Boks that just won't cut it

14 Go to comments
H
Hellhound 1 hour ago
South Africa will beat England at a canter

Not bizarre, but needed. Everyone usually lifts their game against the Boks. Now instead of facing reality, they prefer to live in the past and look hopefully toward the score of the WC semi, hoping they can recreate that result and by some miracle snatch a victory.


It's better than the alternative knowing what is going to happen. Especially looking at the experimental squads the Boks put up against the Wallabies in the RC, not using their best team. That same Wallabies beat them last week.


Now the Boks isn't using an experimental squad. They put out as close to the strongest team the Boks have available at the moment. That must scare the pants off of them. If an experimental squad can destroy the Wallabies, what would the strongest team be able to do to the English?


Instead of sinking into dispear, they prefer to hope that their players can match the Boks. Even though they know what is coming. The English are scared and they won't show it.


Now imagine how Wales must feel knowing they are up next weekend? They don't even have the dubious record of at least close losses like the English. It's a complete nightmare for these 2 countries and rightly so.


The Boks usually take the pedal of the medal post WC's, but not this Bok team. They are better than the WC winning Boks of both '19 and '23. They are stronger up front. They are faster at the back. They can hit front and back. In broken play they are the most dangerous team. They have the best defence and attack also scoring the most tries.


In a way I feel sorry for both the English and Wales. Only those with blinders on expects a close game. Looking at both teams man to man, strategy to strategy, play to play, they are so outmatched it would be a joke if it wasn't so serious. We need the NH to be strong and we need the gap to become closer in rugby so the game stay exciting because runaway scores sometimes is fun, but it doesn't bring as much joy as a close game won.

14 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Coach says there’s ‘a clear candidate' to replace Scott Barrett as captain There’s ‘a clear candidate' to replace Scott Barrett as Crusaders capt
Search