Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Women's Rugby World Cup 2025 will 'build towards' Twickenham showpiece

LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 20: A general view of Twickenham, home of England Rugby during the Guinness Women's Six Nations 2024 match between England and Ireland at Twickenham Stadium on April 20, 2024 in London, England.(Photo by Bob Bradford - CameraSport via Getty Images)

Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 organisers believe the spread of matches during the tournament will provide an opportunity to “attract new fans across the country”.

ADVERTISEMENT

During a ticketing update on Tuesday, it was confirmed that more than 400,000 tickets will go on sale for the six-week tournament, starting in September, with over 60 per cent of those priced at £25 or under and children’s admission starting at just £5.

It will be possible for a family of four to attend the opening match of the tournament at the Stadium of Light for as little as £30, however, the most expensive ticket for the Twickenham final will cost £95.

Video Spacer

Abbie Ward: Bump in the Road | trailer

Bump in the Road explores the challenges faced by professional female athletes and all working mothers, featuring England lock, Abbie Ward. Watch the full documentary on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Abbie Ward: Bump in the Road | trailer

Bump in the Road explores the challenges faced by professional female athletes and all working mothers, featuring England lock, Abbie Ward. Watch the full documentary on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

The showpiece match and the bronze final, which will be staged as one of several double headers, will be the only World Cup matches played in London.

Hosts England, who will open their campaign in Sunderland, will play their remaining pool-stage matches in Northampton and Brighton.

Should they emerge from their pool, as they are expected to do comfortably, then England will be guaranteed to play their quarter-final at Bristol’s Ashton Gate.

Sandy Park in Exeter, the venue for last weekend’s Premiership Women’s Rugby (PWR) final, will host the other two last-eight matches while Ashton Gate will stage both semi-finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 managing director, Sarah Massey is confident that is the right approach, especially as 95 per cent of the UK population live within two hours travel time of a tournament venue.

“The Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 final is going to be the pinnacle. There’s going to be big demand to pack the stadium out,” Massey told RugbyPass.

“I think questions have been asked about whether we could put a match at Twickenham in the pool phase or knockout phase. [But] I think the way that we’ve set the venues out, going around the country, starting up in Sunderland to kick it off in the north of England, ending up in Twickenham for the final is absolutely the right decision.

“We’ve got some great venues that will host the quarter-finals and the semi-finals, we’ve got a big stadium at Ashton Gate, and I think everything will build towards Twickenham and I think that’s the right decision.”

ADVERTISEMENT

She added: “We did an extensive process to identify those venues and make sure that we were going around the country, to make sure that we had every region covered.

“I think it was also really important that we had a lot of matches outside of that south-east region. You might say that we’ve now only got one match in the south-east region, but it just gives the opportunity to attract new fans around our other venues across the country.”

Organisers also defended the price of the most expensive ticket for the final, which will cost nearly twice as much as the top-tier ticket for the UEFA Women’s Euro 2022 final at Wembley two years ago.

Related

“We should take pride in that. The women’s game is growing, it’s hugely exciting,” Paul Lemon, director of ticketing at World Rugby, said.

“We’re confident in those prices. When you compare with previous other sports, it’s easy to compare the price without necessarily looking at the sales volume.

“I think the Euros final is a great example, they probably could have sold that [match] four times over. Again, that was two, three years ago and we’re talking about an event in another year’s time.

“So, the timing’s different, the moment’s different and we’re really excited about this opportunity. But again, we’ve got that huge range of prices, so that slightly more expensive ticket also enables us to be able to this accessible pricing.”

Tickets for the opening match and final will go on pre-sale to Mastercard holders on September 17th – three days after the Red Roses play the Black Ferns at Twickenham – and general pre-sale seven days later.

Fans intending to attend the showpiece tournament are being advised to register their interest by signing up to the official Women’s RWC 2025 website.

“We’re just aiming to have record-breaking attendances for each of our matches and sell as many tickets as we can,” Massey added.

“[We want to] have maximum attendances and have as many new fans coming into women’s rugby as we can and generate that momentum from when we kick off in Sunderland.”

Hosts England, defending champions New Zealand, France, Canada, Ireland, USA, South Africa, Japan and Fiji have already booked their tickets to England.

The winner of this weekend’s South American play-off between Brazil and Colombia will join them while the top six non-qualified nations at the end of WXV 2024 will complete the Women’s RWC 2025 line-up.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

286 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search