Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Women's Super Series slammed as world champion Black Ferns forced to use tents and portable toilets

The Black Ferns. (Photo by Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images)

Former Black Ferns star Melodie Robinson has blasted the playing conditions that her former side are enduring at a major international tournament in the United States.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Black Ferns are currently competing in the women’s Super Series competition in San Diego, alongside Canada, England, France and the United States, but are playing test matches on a training field, with the players reduced to using a tent as a changing room and using a portable toilet, while there is no seating for fans.

Robinson, who played 18 tests for New Zealand between 1996-2002 and is now a sports broadcaster, left a scathing review of the competition’s facilities as an international rugby tournament for women.

“The Black Ferns will say ‘at least we’re playing international rugby’. But personally, in this day and age, that’s not equity, that’s not equality, it’s not really good enough,” she said on TVNZ.

“In 1996, we went to the Churchill Cup in Canada. We played in fields with no seats, nobody watched. We did stay in a nice hotel though.

“Back in 1996, we had better conditions than the 2019 Black Ferns have.

“[The] Black Ferns can’t really say anything, because they’re over there. It’s the United States that’s probably put the facilities up. They don’t have as much money.”

The criticism comes just one month after World Rugby launched a worldwide campaign to advance and develop the women’s game.

“From the highest levels of the sport’s governance to grassroots’ participation, we are wholly committed to driving gender-balance and ensuring that women have equal opportunities both on and off the field,” World Rugby chairman Bill Beaumont said.

The conditions of the Super Series, however, seem to contradict Beaumont’s claims.

With 2.7 million female players around the globe, participation rates in women’s rugby have risen by 28 percent since 2017, while 40 percent of rugby’s 400 million-strong global fanbase is made up by females, according to Stuff.

ADVERTISEMENT

Through their ‘Try Stop US’ campaign, World Rugby wants to further increase those numbers as it tries to push on and make women’s rugby equitable and equal with the men’s game.

“We firmly believe that the development of women in rugby is the single greatest opportunity for our sport to grow in the next decade,” Beaumont said in a World Rugby statement as the initiative was launched in Dublin.

“Not only is women’s rugby experiencing unprecedented growth around the world but we are well on the way to realising our vision of a more equitable game for all through the implementation of our ambitious strategic women’s action plan, which is having a transformational effect on all areas of the game.”

There are still six matches left to play in the Super Series, with the tournament culminating in match-ups between New Zealand v England and France v the United States at Torero Stadium in San Diego on July 14.

ADVERTISEMENT

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
J
JW 10 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search