Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rory Duncan told he's no longer part of Worcester's plans - reports

Rory Duncan had success with the Cheetahs in the PRO14, guiding them to the playoffs at the first time of asking. (Photo by Huw Evans Agency/Gallo Images)

Worcester Warriors head coach Rory Duncan has been a man in demand over the last six months, as the South African’s work with the Cheetahs and Worcester has earned him admiring glances from rival teams.

ADVERTISEMENT

Duncan was reportedly in the frame to succeed Franco Smith at his former franchise before Hawies Fourie was announced as the incoming head coach, whilst he has also been linked with the vacant position at the Southern Kings, who became the first South African club to have majority independent ownership when they were the subject of a takeover from The Greatest Rugby Company in the Whole Wide World earlier this year.

Worcester were subject to their own takeover this year, as Jason Whittingham, Colin Goldring and Jed McCrory took charge of the Gallagher Premiership club. McCrory has since left the club, but Goldring and Whittingham have spoken publicly about their commitment to the side and have announced their intent to not only remain at Worcester long-term, but to also develop much of the land around the Warriors’ Sixways Stadium.

Director of Rugby Alan Solomons has also signed an extension to his contract with the club, ensuring that he is tenured to the West Midlands side until the end of the 2021/22 season.

There looks to be less stability at the head coach position, however, with Worcester News reporting that they have been informed by the club that Duncan is not a part of the “strategic plan for the future” that they are looking to implement.

“The club has put in place a strategic plan for the future of Warriors,” a club spokesman said to Worcester News.

“We do not envisage Rory Duncan being part of those plans and, therefore, we have given Rory permission to seek opportunities elsewhere.”

ADVERTISEMENT

This will add further fuel to the fire that Duncan is bound for Port Elizabeth, where the Southern Kings have openly listed him among a four-man shortlist that is also comprised of Pieter de Villiers, Steven Jackson and Corniel van Zyl. De Villiers, according to a tweet from Eastern Province General Manager Thando Manana, will be interviewing for the role on Monday.

With the seasons of Worcester and the Kings to begin in September, both will be eager to resolve the uncertainty hanging over their head coaching positions as soon as possible.

Should the Worcester coach eventually get the position, he will be no stranger to Eastern Province, having played for the EP Kings in the Currie Cup for two years prior to his retirement from professional rugby.

Watch: Josh Strauss has left Sale Sharks to join the Blue Bulls.

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search