Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Worcester owners blame players and fans in statement branded 'shameless'

Rory Sutherland /Getty

Worcester Warriors owners have apportioned blame on the playing squad and on their supporters in a statement branded ‘despicably shameless’ by one journalist.

ADVERTISEMENT

Warriors have been placed in administration with the club facing debts totalling more than £25million, including at least £6m in unpaid tax, and have been suspended from the sport by the Rugby Football Union.

Now owners Colin Goldring and Jason Whittingham have taken aim at the players and the supporters for the club’s failure in a remarkable missive.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

In a lengthy statement issued to ITV News, the pair hit out at players for not taking the same salary cuts as staff and bizarrely, blamed supporters for not turning up at Sixways in sufficient numbers.

“Dear Staff, Supporters and Community of Worcester Warriors, we are sorry to you all that the Club is in this current position and for the emotional distress this must have caused but we remain hopeful, through the process of Administration, that the Club can find a new Owner and emerge in a stronger position in order to preserve Rugby at Sixways.

Related

“We are thankful to all of the staff that supported the Club through Covid in accepting a significant reduction in their Salary but sorry that the Playing Squad could not accept a similar level of reduction and in some Player’s instances would not accept any pay cut at all despite our openness at the financial impact this would have on the club.

“We are thankful to all of the Supporters who continued to support the Club in any way they could, including many that donated their season ticket payment during the lockdown, and to the Government for the Furlough support that enabled us to keep every single staff member fully employed throughout the pandemic when many Club’s and Business’ were making redundancies. In doing so the Club took on enormous debt like so many others but we felt it was the right thing to do.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are thankful to those supporters who turned up week in week out to support the Club but sorry that there were not more, nor enough of you on a regular basis to help make the Club financially viable despite the significant personal funds we put into the Club.

“We are sorry that we did not have the foresight during the Pandemic to cut back on the Squad budget but instead remained committed to giving the Club the best chance of being competitive.

“We are thankful for the highlights on many match days but sorry that we were not able to win more games for those Supporters that did turn up.

“We are thankful to the DCMS for the Financial Support they gave to all Clubs during the Pandemic but sorry that the post-pandemic recovery did not happen overnight and that many Clubs, like Worcester, are struggling with the debts we incurred during Covid.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Despite this we remain committed to working with the Administrator, and DCMS, to deliver the best possible outcome for this Club, Supporters and the Community of Worcester.”

Head of player affairs at the RPA, Christian Day slammed the statement, writing: “I’m not one to speak out of line, and I’m not even going to give airtime to that disgraceful statement from 2 ex-owners that should have been consigned to the bin. The Worcester players and staff have been a credit to that club, it’s supporters and city. Show some dignity.”

Rugby journalist and commentator Jamie Lyall described the statement as ‘beyond shameless’ and ‘cowardly’.

“Latest statement from the Worcester owners is beyond shameless. As though Donald Trump has taken up residence at Sixways. Blaming players, fans… anyone but themselves. A cowardly offering.”

Irish journalist Andy McGeady described the statement as ‘despicably shameless’. “The Worcester Warriors ownership. Shameless. Absolutely, despicably shameless. It’s really odd that they didn’t mention the car park.”

Telegraph writer Charlie Morgan branded it ‘utterly grim’.

Current Warriors back row Matt Kvesic poked fun at the statement, suggesting a Public Relations Officer was urgently needed at the club.

Two consortiums, one involving former Worcester chief executive Jim O’Toole, are understood to have expressed interest in buying the club out of administration, but it could take place after a player exodus.

Contracted personnel were due to be paid on Friday but the PA news agency reports this has not happened, meaning staff are entitled to move elsewhere after a statutory two-week notice period.

additional reporting PA

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
d
duncan 812 days ago

Well actually given the two guys paid the wages of all the players out of their own pockets for years, the players would not show any solidarity with the rest of the club staff when they got paid in full during covid and it seems still expect the guys to continue to pay them even when the crowds were too small to generate enough income and the club's in debt for £25 million.....I've got some sympathy for their point of view, why should they personally subsidise the players lifestyles?

Rugby union players are paid way more then the game can afford because individuals subsidise them, why do they think they're entitled to expect that for ever??

M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 813 days ago

Wowza, these two guys… Talk about some tenebrous shade being awkwardly thrown. The buck clearly doesn’t stop with them, but must be laid at the feet of players who refuse to take a pay cut even though their lives are on the line when stepping onto the pitch and, oh, those nasty fans who don’t show up to root for a team that’s been in the bottom of the premiership rankings for seemingly more years than in a baker’s dozen. We just simply don’t know the plight these two courageous dotards have dealt with, oh the tales of woe they could tell...

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search