Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Cup in court? Furious Scotland make incredible threat

Scotland are on the verge of a legal battle with World Rugby. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The devastation of Typhoon Hagibis could send this already-chaotic World Cup into the court room following revelations of Scottish rugby officials threatening legal action against World Rugby to ensure their do-or-die clash against Japan takes place on Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scotland’s hopes of qualifying for the knockout stages of the tournament have been jeopardised by the anticipated arrival of the typhoon in Japan, which has forced the cancellation of the England vs France and New Zealand vs Italy fixtures, which were set to take place on Saturday.

Currently lying in third place in Pool A, Scotland need a victory against the Brave Blossoms to finish in a top two spot in their group, which would solidify their place in the quarter-finals, but the looming threat of Typhoon Hagibis could be enough to call the game off altogether.

Such an outcome would see Scotland remain in third place and miss out on a play-offs spot for just the second time in their history.

An announcement issued by World Rugby on Thursday stated that an official decision would be made on Sunday as to whether the fixture would go ahead as scheduled.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

According to the Telegraph, the Scots’ legal advice is that under tournament rules, there is flexibility to adjust the playing schedule in case of a force majeure, of which Typhoon Hagibis evidently is.

A series of elongated and fiery meetings were held throughout Thursday, which reportedly left Scottish Rugby’s chief executive Mark Dodson “in a state of apoplexy” as he and chief operating officer Dominic McKay fought to keep their nation’s World Cup hopes alive.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is believed Scotland’s preferred outcome is to move the game back 24 hours from its current time of 7:45pm on Sunday to the same time on Monday.

They have stressed that at that stage, Typhoon Hagibis is expected to have passed Yokohama, where the game is to be played.

If the game is cancelled, however, the match will be declared a draw, leaving the Scots at least three points short of Ireland, who are heavily expected to defeat Samoa in their final pool match in Fukuoka on Saturday.

The revelations come after members of the Italian squad were said to be left “utterly heartbroken” at the sudden cancellation of their clash against the All Blacks without any prior warning.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both head coach Conor O’Shea and captain Sergio Parisse were in Tokyo waiting to announce their team for Saturday’s match at 1pm yesterday when they received notification from World Rugby about the fate of the clash at 12:59pm.

While attaining a maiden victory over the back-to-back reigning world champions would have been extremely unlikely, Italy’s aspirations of appearing in the World Cup knockout stages for the first time ever hindered on that match.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B3b41BcAMH2/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

The cancellation of England’s fixture against France also denied the French a chance at claiming top spot in Pool C, with tournament director Alan Gilpin insistent that a precedent has been set and that a “one size fits all” approach is the only fair way to proceed.

A senior spokesman for Scottish Rugby has brandished World Rugby’s handling of the affair as “shambolic” and “embarrassing”, and that unless it adheres to its own tournament rules, Scotland will have no choice but to take immediate legal action.

“We’re willing to do whatever it takes to get this game [between Scotland and Japan] on,” said the spokesman.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1182329027912245255

“There are 10,000 Scotland supporters here to see their team play, and for the integrity of the sport and this tournament, we’ve got to find a way to deliver on our undertaking to stage this game.

“World Rugby said three or four months ago that they had contingency plans in place to address any problems or challenges that might occur, and we took them at their word.

“We now expect them to deploy those contingency plans and ensure this match goes ahead. The fans, players and everyone who loves rugby will demand nothing less. The whole situation is almost beyond belief.”

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search