Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby give their view on Cowan-Dickie's Lions concussion row

(Photo by Sydney Seshibedi/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

World Rugby have responded to criticism of the Lions’ recent selection of Exeter and England hooker Luke Cowan-Dickie to play a tour match for them in South Africa just seven days after he suffered a Gallagher Premiership final concussion in London.

ADVERTISEMENT

The front-rower was left sparked out on the Twickenham pitch after got his tackle technique wrong in a collision versus Harlequins. Cowan-Dickie flew out the next day with Lions and he was chosen on their bench for the following weekend’s fixture versus Sigma Lions in Johannesburg.

This selection ignited online controversy. Ex-England scrum-half Kyran Bracken tweeted: “Luke is unconscious for over 20 seconds. Possibly 40-60 secs. How can he play the following week? I am absolutely disgusted that the powers that be allow this to happen. A stain on our great game.”

Video Spacer

Lions boss Warren Gatland talks about Alun Wyn Jones’ recovery from last month’s dislocated shoulder

Video Spacer

Lions boss Warren Gatland talks about Alun Wyn Jones’ recovery from last month’s dislocated shoulder

Concussion awareness group Progressive Rugby added: “How on earth is Luke Cowan-Dickie on the Lions team sheet just 5 days after this? Cowan-Dickie will have to undergo stringent return to play protocols and will not be able to progress to full training until he passes series of tests.”

This outpouring of negativity resulted in Warren Gatland having to twice defend the Lions’ Cowan-Dickie selection decision, initially stating: “I take full advice from the medical team and whatever they say goes as far as I am concerned so he has been through all his protocols and we feel like we have been over and above with those protocols with him.

“We have had an independent consultant, a world-leading expert, have a look at it and he has given the all-clear as well. As far as I am concerned we have followed everything and the medical team have given him the all-clear. He is fit and good to go.”

This additional precaution taken by the Lions is part of a new World Rugby initiative whereby an independent concussion consultant (ICC) must now be consulted on whether a player should return to play following the successful completion of the six-stage graduated return to play process.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s an additional layer of review that World Rugby used at the 2019 and 2015 World Cups and they have now set up a panel of independent consultants so that a concussed elite-level player looking to return to play ten or fewer days after a concussion has their case independently reviewed before receiving clearance to take the field.

“It’s quite timely to speak about this given the incident around one of the players on the Lions that gained a lot of publicity,” said Eanna Falvey, the World Rugby chief medical officer, at a media briefing where he explained the reasoning behind the introduction of the permanent use of independent concussion consultants.

“It’s worthwhile looking at that purely from a scientific perspective, medical perspective. I can’t talk about the individual case but I am well aware of the case, I have discussed it with the team and I very happy that the entire process was managed optimally from a medical point of view.

“What is worth noting is we, as an extra measure for the Lions tour, have helped the Lions implement concussion consultants for the tour and in that particular case a consultant who is a concussion specialist completely outside of rugby, actually from a different continent and from a different sport, was fully appraised of the entire case management and the assessment result and was very happy with the process around the player’s recovery and that the player wasn’t at adverse risk with regard to returning to activity.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is obviously an emotive area and there will be many opinions on this and we welcome those and having a situation where we are talking about this raise the awareness of the process, makes players more aware of it and probably will give pause for a number of players in the future coming back into activity, being more honest about their symptom reporting and being more careful in adhering to the process of outlined by their medical management. All of us will continue to work hard on this but the ICC process adds a layer of robustness to a process which we have been continuing to refine over the years.”

Falvey added: “Luke was entirely symptom-free so you are going to be looking at this very carefully to ensure there aren’t any delayed onset symptoms, that there isn’t anything untoward and then at the end of that you have the independent review to ensure there is no stone unturned and that you have done the job as well as you can.

“We have to treat players individually, we have to treat them on the basis that we have and the evidence that we have because, in a professional game, players demand their care is individualised to their medical history and to their situation and that is what we deliver.

“The vast majority of these (concussion) situations are clear cut. The difficult cases are ones that sometimes cause controversy and sometimes cause an issue and it is one of the confounding and difficult factors around concussion that they are well defined central areas but there is a lot of grey on either side down to the point where there are groups who don’t agree on the definition of concussion.

“Because there isn’t definition we have developed what we call an operational definition for a concussion which we published back in 2012 which was the basis for the head injury assessment, the first sport to introduce an off-field assessment from that perspective.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

j
johnz 25 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

This is such a devisive issue in New Zealand, Razor is a brave man; people tend to take polarising stands of all or nothing positions. I suspect there's a balanced compromise, if people are able to discuss the pros and cons rationally. There are good arguments from both sides of the debate, and as with all controversial issues, the solution is rarely black and white.


But let's take the Barrett vs Mounga debate, a topic that never grows old. I think some context is in order when Barrett is proclaimed as "loyal", while it seems to be insinuated that Mo'unga is not.


A little history is needed regarding Barrett's loyalty - so far he has had 2 (or 3?) sabbaticals, which are really just overseas-based All Black's by stealth. Since he left the Hurricanes, he's 'been a bit part player at the Blues at best, while his performances at SR level have left plenty to be desired. As of last season, he quit NZ Rugby for Japan. It's concievable the rise of Mounga played a part in that decision, while Mounga's subsequent departure appears to have played a part in BB's return.


Only after the fact BB tried to negotiate a contract to be the 1st official overseas-based player. So loyal? Maybe. Opportunistic? Probably. It's clear Barrett's first instinct was not commitment and sacrifice to the coalface of Super Rugby.


I don't recall a Mo'unga being awarded a sabatical at all, and he has been a far bigger contributor than Barrett has at Super Rugby level for quite some time. Perhaps NZR just didn't value Mo'unga enough to bend the rules the same as they have for Barrett?


NZR have always massaged the rules for Barrett and expended a lot of financial resources to keep his services. At the same time, our player depth get's stripped away, as premier SR players, such as Plumber and Burke, take off for better pay cheques elsewhere.


Personally, I wouldn't mind if the big wage bill for a few aging stars like Barrett are shared with Japan. I'm not convinced Barrett's adding much at SR level and the money could be used elsewhere. Just as long as there's no guarantee of a jersey for such marque players, I don't see a big issue.

33 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Lamb to the slaughter? Italy aim to 'get stuck into' All Blacks Lamb to the slaughter? Italy aim to 'get stuck into' All Blacks
Search