Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby issue statement on Johnny Sexton and HIA call

By PA
Jonathan Sexton during an Ireland rugby media conference at the Southern Cross Hotel in Dunedin, New Zealand. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

World Rugby has warned against “irresponsible” remote head-injury diagnosis in defending its Head Injury Assessment (HIA) protocols.

ADVERTISEMENT

Safety campaign group Progressive Rugby has claimed HIA checks are “being exposed” in the wake of Johnny Sexton’s selection for Ireland’s second Test against New Zealand.

Talismanic fly-half Sexton failed HIA1 – an on-field assessment – in Ireland’s 42-19 defeat by the All Blacks in Auckland last weekend.

Video Spacer

Bryan Habana, Jonny Hill’s hair pulling and South Africa’s revenge | RugbyPass Offload | Ep 41

Video Spacer

Bryan Habana, Jonny Hill’s hair pulling and South Africa’s revenge | RugbyPass Offload | Ep 41

Progressive Rugby has called into question Sexton’s subsequent selection for Saturday’s second Test in Dunedin, raising fears over the HIA process.

But World Rugby has stressed that failing the HIA1 on-field assessment does not automatically mean a player has sustained concussion.

“It is the duty of any individual or organisation commenting on the Head Injury Assessment process to do so using the facts,” a World Rugby spokesperson told the PA news agency.

“Attempting to diagnose a serious medical condition like concussion from afar, without all the relevant information including a player’s medical history, is irresponsible and no substitute for the world-leading medical care received by elite rugby players.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Doctors are supported by the Head Injury Assessment and recently updated return-to-play protocols put in place by World Rugby.

“These protocols are developed using scientific evidence and independent expert opinion which are kept under constant review, as we never stand still on player welfare.”

Related

Sexton was withdrawn after slipping and colliding with Sam Kane in Saturday’s first Test defeat, with the 36-year-old not returning after his HIA1 check.

The full HIA process involves three steps, and Sexton later passed both HIA2 and HIA3 before being cleared to return to play this coming weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Progressive Rugby has questioned Sexton’s return, but World Rugby has moved to defend the head-injury check process.

“Concussion in elite rugby is formally diagnosed by qualified doctors via the HIA2 and HIA3 assessments as part of the Head Injury Assessment protocol, with the exception of any player displaying obvious symptoms who will be immediately removed from play,” said a World Rugby spokesperson.

“The in-game HIA1 off-field assessment combines video review and clinical observation to determine suspected concussion and informs the need to remove a player as a precaution.

“Any player who had not displayed obvious concussion symptoms and who compares to a pre-recorded baseline on HIA2 and HIA3 assessments, which take place two and 36 hours after an incident respectively, is deemed by medical professionals to be clear of concussion.

“There is an open and frank discussion about head injury in rugby which is to be welcomed.

“Everyone wants the game to be the safest it can possibly be, and to encourage new players to benefit from all the good that rugby does.

“It should be reiterated that the Head Injury Assessment process only applies to elite rugby where there is an extremely high level of constant medical care.

“Such an environment is not possible at the community level and anyone who suspects a concussion should seek medical advice immediately as per World Rugby guidelines.”

Safety group Progressive Rugby insists, however, that any failure of HIA1 should lead medics to treat the player’s future participation with “extreme caution”.

“Elite players who fail an in-game HIA1 have, by definition, displayed cognitive dysfunction requiring their removal,” said a Progressive Rugby spokesperson.

“In our view, this is sufficient evidence, regardless of subsequent testing, to exercise extreme caution for the good of both their short and long-term health.

Related

“This caution must be further amplified in players with a history of brain injury, as evidence is they are at higher risk of sustaining further concussions and other injuries.

“Regrettably, the HIA is being exposed. Last week the process again failed to diagnose a clear and obvious brain injury (Jeremy Loughman), while three days later we are told it has identified a phantom one (Sexton).

“The fact is there remains no examination by any expert that can demonstrate a brain has healed and is not at risk of further damage. As such, if player welfare is truly the game’s number one priority, the only option must be to err on the side of caution – otherwise the new elite protocols are failing in their key purpose.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
C
Charlie 867 days ago

Has world rugby got the balls to comment on the girlie screaming and hair pulling of the two immature English locks ????

T
Tak 867 days ago

Poor journalism when you can’t get the spelling of the ABs’ captain right - it’s Sam Cane not Kane. Tosser

D
DarstedlyDan 867 days ago

Once more an "how dare you question us" attitude from World Rugby, who are again showing they don't take concussion seriously. To take it seriously would mean engaging seriously with concussion experts (and Progressive Rugby) when they raise an obvious issue following Sexton's clear head injury in the first test. He failed his HIA. But no. WR show again that they'd rather get the player back out there instead of taking a safety-first approach (especially with a player who has a history of these injuries).

WR aren't doing enough. They will be sued, and they will lose.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 50 minutes ago
Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones

This piece is nothing more than the result of revisionist fancy of Northern Hemisphere rugby fans. Seeing what they want to see, helped but some surprisingly good results and a desire to get excited about doing something well.


I went back through the 6N highlights and sure enough in every English win I remembered seeing these exact holes on the inside, that are supposedly the fallout out of a Felix Jones system breaking down in the hands of some replacement. Every time the commentators mentioned England being targeted up the seam/around the ruck or whatever. Each game had a try scored on the inside of the blitz, no doubt it was a theme throughout all of their games. Will Jordan specifically says that Holland had design that move to target space he saw during their home series win.


Well I'm here to tell you they were the same holes in a Felix Jones system being built as well. This woe is now sentiment has got to stop. The game is on a high, these games have been fantastic! It is Englands attack that has seen their stocks increase this year, and no doubt that is what SB told him was the teams priority. Or it's simply science, with Englands elite players having worked towards a new player welfare and management system, as part of new partnership with the ERU, that's dictating what the players can and can't put their bodies through.


The only bit of truth in this article is that Felix is not there to work on fixing his defence. England threw away another good chance of winning in the weekend when they froze all enterprise under pressure when no longer playing attacking footy for the second half. That mindset helped (or not helped if you like) of course by all this knee jerk, red brained criticism.

32 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones
Search