Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby leak suggests Rassie Erasmus' ref criticisms are mostly correct

Springboks boss Rassie Erasmus

World Rugby will acknowledge that South African director of rugby Rassie Erasmus was correct about the vast majority of criticism aimed at referee Nic Berry following the Springboks’ first test defeat by the British & Irish Lions.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is the revelation made today by Brendan Nel and Hendrik Cronje writing in the Afrikaans weekly newspaper Rapport – South Africa’s second largest Sunday paper.

Erasmus’ 62-minute video, which was released on Twitter, pointed out 26 errors which he claimed were made by Berry, his touch judges and the TMO during the Lions’ 22-17 win in Cape Town.

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber on year-end tour challenges

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 2:49
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 2:49
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Jacques Nienaber on year-end tour challenges

    Both the content and manner of the video’s publication have since come under heavy criticism and as a result World Rugby have convened a misconduct hearing next weekend. Both South Africa’s DOR and his employers SA Rugby will appear before this independent disciplinary committee to answer charges of bringing the game into disrepute.

    However, ahead of this meeting Rapport has revealed that World Rugby believes Erasmus was correct about 23 of the 26 highlighted incidents.

    This does not, however, deal with the question of the video being published on social media rather than sent privately to the sport’s governing body and its referee managers Joel Jutge and Joe Schmidt.

    Sending this kind of video analysis – albeit usually on a vastly less substantial scale – to the referee post-match is a standard approach within the professional game.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Erasmus denies making the video public and various rumours have since circulated suggesting the source of the leak to Twitter is in Australia.

    On an ‘innocent-until-proven-guilty’ basis, the onus at next weekend’s disciplinary hearing will be firmly on World Rugby to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Erasmus was the source of the leak which came from an account registered to a Jaco Johan.

    If found guilty South Africa’s 48-year-old World Cup winning head coach could face a range of sanctions with a fine and possible ban – or suspended ban – the most likely outcome.

     

    ADVERTISEMENT

    KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

    New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

    France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    Lions Share | Episode 4

    Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

    USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

    Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    18 Comments
    G
    Gareth 1367 days ago

    So on the 'leak'. The Vimeo account that posted the video was tied to the email address of Russell Belter, he owns a video production company that has been working for SARU and Supersport for 20 years. It was posted under the JJ account, the same initials as Jaco Johan the 'pundit' that Erasmus had been praising that week.

    It's up to everyone else to decide if they think that evidence is stronger than 'rumour it came from Australia'. 😀

    D
    DP 1366 days ago

    You do realise that this proves nothing, so what if Belter posted the video on his account, Erasmus hardly filmed it on his own? Vimeo channels can be password protected so someone leaked the password. It matters not where the video was leaked but who leaked it and I guarantee it won’t have Erasmuss fingerprints on it. This will benefit the game for all in the long run, I don’t see this as dragging the game into disrepute but rather forcing WR to do something about incompetent arrogant performances and behaviour. How do people feel about Gatland who’s been running his mouth off for years, who seeked to get the Boks 9 cited for a tackle two of his own players perpetrated during the warm up match, all in the name of gaining an advantage while simultaneously bullying a TMO before the first test. It’s shameful behaviour which goes against perceived rugby values yet no one within the British establishment took issue at this. Mind boggling. I particularly love the way Eddie Jones jumps on the bandwagon while conveniently ignoring his own personal history… rugby values indeed… Erasmus essentially turned the series back towards an even footing.

    A
    Andrew 1367 days ago

    Leaked by whom and cui bono?

    W
    Wayneo 1367 days ago

    The two million dollar questions right there friend!

    i
    isaac 1367 days ago

    Pathetic...if this was the outcome..why all the hoolabaloo ..ban him for two years from international rugby to act as a deterrent to other officials who would want to criticize match officials publicaly after games....no one is anti south africa...we all complain about calls against out teams but he just threw mud on rugby as a sport..BAN him

    M
    Mags 1367 days ago

    Difference is, those calls "we all complain about" are made only one or two or three times, maybe more. And most importantly, have a small impact on the outcome of the game.


    You're missing the point, Nic Berry and the other refs decisions were 23 mistakes or more, all against the Springboks, and had a massive impact on the outcome of the game. This is clear and obvious broad daylight biasedness, this had to and must be called out to maintain respect for the game. And had to be on a bigger scale for everyone to see just how biased the refs were in that game, a game that only happens every 12 years and is the next best series in rugby after the world cup.

    S
    Snash 1367 days ago

    Let's not forget Gatland's contribution, and if punishment is dished out he must be included.

    D
    DP 1367 days ago

    This much was always painfully obvious to anyone who bothered watching the video under the assumption that it was not leaked by Erramus but someone else. If the Ozzie ref Berry had the decency to engage with the current world champion director of rugby then this entire episode would have been averted, how’s THAT for arrogance!? For all you self righteous Lions and Kiwi supporters out there: Imagine Fozzy and Gatland having to stomach being told as an excuse that a 5pm power nap was more important than a review of your performance of a test match that happens every 12 years. Piss poor refereeing rightly called out.

    R
    RJ 1367 days ago

    Again, it doesn't matter if he was right or wrong. Not one bit.


    If coaches start posting videos criticiszing referees after every game, whether they are right or wrong, it changes the game.


    Rugby is meant to a team sport built on respect, referees makes mistakes. Coaches should have a channel to be critical, but not publicly. No other sport allows this to happen.


    If he doesn't get punished, then every team coach will do this before a match, critisizing a referee before a match to put pressur on them.


    I don't agree that coaches should be able to comment on referees to put pressure on them, that should be punished... but this is 10 times worse

    Load More Comments

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    N
    NB 1 hour ago
    Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

    There are already reports of French clubs hoovering Aussie teenage talent and it made big waves down under https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250417-rugby-australia-hits-out-at-french-clubs-poaching-young-talent - big enough for Dan Herbert to come out and challenge the legality of the policy. Also they set up academy ‘shops’ in the Pac Islands a while back.


    The sheer size of the Top 14 season wil demand squads as big as in the NFL in future, esp if they stick to their welfare guns more rigorously. That will mean more JIFF products and more young overseas ‘graduates’!

    7 Go to comments
    TRENDING
    TRENDING John Barclay makes concerning Owen Farrell observation despite Test spot calls Barclay makes concerning Farrell observation despite Test spot calls