Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby statement: Japan's Michael Leitch banned after red card

(Photo by Koki Nagahama/Getty Images)

Red-carded Japan back row Michael Leitch will be available for the start of the upcoming Rugby World Cup in France after only getting a three-match ban that can be reduced to two with the successful completion of tackle school.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leitch, a star of the 2019 finals, was sent off in last weekend’s 24-22 warm-up loss to Samoa in Sapporo, but the sanction he has now received at a disciplinary hearing won’t impact his availability for the opening round September 10 encounter with Chile in Toulouse.

Instead, he will sit out this Saturday’s warm-up against Tonga in Osaka as well as the August 5 and August 26 friendlies versus Fiji and Italy. However, he will become free to play against the Italians as he intends to take part in the World Rugby coaching intervention programme.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

A statement read: “Japan No8 Michael Leitch appeared before an independent judicial committee on Wednesday having received a red card for an offence contrary to law 9.11 against Samoa.

“The independent disciplinary committee was chaired by Nigel Hampton (New Zealand) and joined by former player Ofisa Tonu’u (New Zealand) and former international referee Donal Courtney (Ireland).

Related

“The player accepted that foul play occurred and that the offending warranted a red card. The committee noted that the offence carries a mandatory mid-range sanction (six matches), and having considered the mitigating factors reduced the sanction by the maximum mitigation of 50 per cent. The final sanction of three matches is to be applied as follows:

  • Japan vs Tonga, July 29;
  • Japan vs Fiji, August 5;
  • Italy vs Japan, August 26*.

“The player intends to apply to take part in the World Rugby coaching intervention programme to substitute the final match of the sanction for a coaching intervention aimed at modifying specific techniques and technical issues that contributed to the foul play.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
J
Jon 512 days ago

WR is a joke. One year they let players with absorbing head breaking contact off the hook entirely, they next they give a 6 week ban to an injuryless knock.

This case is the opposite of Ireland's situation where they can use the pool stages to get people upto fitness. Japan's tournament begins at the pool stages were it plays its most important matches. It will now go into what are essentially knockout matches without one of its best players ready. An absolute joke.

F
Flankly 513 days ago

Tackle school? That's not nearly tough enough. He should also go to falling off a log school.

C
Christopher 513 days ago

Just like the Irishman’s ban - rest him for the warm-up games! Then he’s fresh for the start of RWC proper.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search