Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby statement: Rugby World Cup final

(Photo by Henry Browne/World Rugby via Getty Images)

World Rugby have issued a statement in light of a media report in New Zealand alleging that the governing body privately acknowledged that the Aaron Smith try disallowed in last month’s Rugby World Cup final versus the Springboks should have stood.

ADVERTISEMENT

A report on stuff.co.nz read: “The All Blacks have another incident to add to their ‘what-if’ file after their agonising 12-11 loss to South Africa in the Rugby World Cup final.

“Stuff understands World Rugby has privately acknowledged to the All Blacks that the ruling out of Aaron Smith’s try in the final was in fact outside the rules, but is refusing to publicly acknowledge that.

Video Spacer

RWC Final – New Zealand v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more to the RWC Final at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

Video Spacer

RWC Final – New Zealand v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more to the RWC Final at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

“It was called back when TMO Tom Foley spotted a knock-on at a lineout, and referee Wayne Barnes then disallowed the try. However, the knock-on happened four phases before the Smith try, despite the TMO only having the power to look back two phases for any knock-on in the build-up to a try.”

New Zealand quickly reacted by scoring a try on 58 minutes through Beauden Barrett but with the conversion kick missed, they went on to lose the final by a single point, 11-12.

Related

In response to Tuesday’s media report from New Zealand, the World Rugby statement read: “As confirmed prior to Rugby World Cup 2023, World Rugby does not publicly comment on match official decisions.

“We stand by our outstanding match official team, who performing one of the hardest jobs in professional sport to an exceptional standard.

ADVERTISEMENT

“As we have seen in recent months, sadly, criticism of match officials can have wide-ranging consequences, including online hate and threats, and we must be mindful of such a human impact.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

149 Comments
J
Johan 363 days ago

Oh for goodness sake can we give this matter a rest now. Its done, over, history. Respect the outcome, mark it down as a good or bad outcome depending on your perspective and lets get back to playing rugby. We will meet again and I am sure Razor, given his pedigree will present the Springboks with an AB team that is a handful. I will be great to see Rassie and Razor squaring off with their teams because they are both top notch couches. I dont like badmouthing the AB’s, and their fans because I have always respected them as a classy bunch and these comments below are really not called for and really does not do justice to the AB history and culture.

C
Cameron 370 days ago

I can’t believe that a “reputable” publication would still get the commentary wrong. You’re owned by World Rugby, so go have a look at the rules. A phase is defined as a ruck, maul, line-out or scrum. Between the knock-on and the “try”, there were no phases. No maul. No line-out. No scrum. No Ruck. A ruck is formed when a player from each side are in contact, on their feet and over the ball. There were no phases, only tackles. The TMO was therefore within his right to review. TV broadcasters have a phase count on the screen - but they are counting recycled balls and not PHASES as defined by World Rugby.

J
Jon 371 days ago

But did they apoligise?

J
Jon 371 days ago

Team 2nd place salty today - go bokke!

Rassie is a great coach (stay off twitter) - love to see what Razor does w ABs now

R
Red and White Dynamight 371 days ago

If this had happened to the Boks, The Waterboy would have crashed the iCloud with video nasties. Let alone in the QterF and SemiF too. SuperSport would have posted it on the stadium screen as-Live.

J
Jon 371 days ago

It’s even more ammusing that they’re withholding the decision on Sam Cane’s red card hearing. It’s still a missing publication on their website after, what, 2 weeks now?

N
Nigel 371 days ago

Yet again the blatant and embarrassing bias of WR/IRB in their attempts to fabricate an African nation to ensure they have some relevance reveals itself. Since 1995 (both the humiliating on and off field interventions) it has become blatantly obvious that SA is all that the governing body has availableto fill that void. Sad really because SA used to be a reasonably competitive rugby nation prior to 1994.

C
Chris 371 days ago

Boks won forget it
Now they can go back to getting poorer more corrupt, and mrdering each other
Congrats

D
Daan 371 days ago

C’mon Kiwi fans, the game is over and the cup is gone. Dwelling on this , as with previous world cups (IE waiting 24 years) is bad for your mental health and won't change the result. Rather focus on the positives, like being in the cricket world cup semi final. Oops, scratch that thought, 82/2 chasing 398 🤦‍♂️

J
Jon 371 days ago

Move on lads

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search