Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby statement: Tonga's George Moala has his appeal dismissed

(Photo by Michael Steele/Getty Images)

Tonga midfielder George Moala will miss three of his country’s Rugby World Cup pool matches after having his appeal against his recent five-match ban dismissed.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was August 15 when the 32-year-old former All Blacks player was originally suspended by an independent disciplinary committee chaired by Stephen Hardy (Australia) and joined by former player Stefan Terblanche (South Africa) and former international referee Valeriu Toma (Romania).

They decided that the red card Moala was given for his August 10 tip tackle versus Canada warranted a 10-match mid-range entry point.

Video Spacer

RugbyPass Insiders | Tonga: Road to Japan | Trailer

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      RugbyPass Insiders | Tonga: Road to Japan | Trailer

      After applying 50 per cent mitigation, the suspension was reduced to five matches, but the Tongan Rugby World Cup pick decided on August 21 to appeal the sanction.

      That appeal hearing has now been heard and the original five-match ban will stay in place.

      Related

      A statement read: “Tonga centre George Moala’s appeal against the decision of a judicial committee to suspend him for five matches arising from an act of foul play contrary to law 9.18 (lifting tackle) in Tonga’s Rugby World Cup warm-up match against Canada on August 10 was heard remotely on August 24.

      “The independent appeal committee was chaired by Christopher Quinlan KC (independent judicial panel chairman), Brenda Heather-Latu (Samoa) and Judge Mike Mika (New Zealand).

      “The appeal committee dismissed the player’s appeal against the entry point of the offending. Having considered the evidence before it, the appeal committee found that the judicial committee which heard the case at first instance was entitled to find that the tackle warranted a mid-range entry point and accordingly upheld the decision of the disciplinary committee.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “As Moala has been selected in the Tonga Rugby World Cup 2023 squad, the suspension remains as imposed by the judicial committee and therefore the player will miss the following matches:

      1. Tonga vs Canada, August 15 (World Cup warm-up),
      2. Clermont vs Perpignan, August 26 (Top 14),
      3. Tonga vs Ireland, September 16 (World Cup),
      4. Tonga vs Scotland, September 24 (World Cup),
      5. Tonga vs South Africa, October 1 (World Cup).”

      ADVERTISEMENT
      Play Video

      South Africa vs Black Ferns XV | Women's International | Full Match Replay

      Play Video

      Namibia vs United Arab Emirates | Asia/Africa Rugby World Cup Play-off | Full Match Replay

      Play Video

      Lions Share | Episode 5

      Play Video

      Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

      Play Video

      Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

      Play Video

      The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

      Play Video

      KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

      Play Video

      New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      22 Comments
      m
      martin 703 days ago

      It's fairly simple World Rugby set sanctions in the laws are for a tackle above the shoulders entry point 2 weeks mid point 6 weeks top sanction 10 weeks. Name me a pro player of any nation ie Billy Vunipola of England who have ever been sanctioned below the 6 week mid point. The sanctions for tip tackle are harsher entry point 6 weeks mid point 10 weeks and top 14 weeks. He got a mid entry point ban no different to what's doled out for high tackle.

      B
      Bob Marler 703 days ago

      It’s even simpler than that.


      Depending on who you are and which Union you belong to, rules apply differently. As a rule of thumb, English players pretty much get away with murder.

      Q
      Q 704 days ago

      Why is it that when a Tongan, Samoan or Fijian tackles an opposition the way Moala did (which in my opinion was impulsive but not intentional to do more harm), they get a harsher punishment?

      Again, unequal level playing field.

      B
      Bob Marler 703 days ago

      I think we know why. Racism.

      V
      Vincent 704 days ago

      Farrell is apparently of good character . But how do they measure that? He was banned previously.

      K
      KiwiSteve 704 days ago

      Tip tackles are potentially career ending with a broken neck the worst outcome. There's no place for that malevolence in the game. Haven't seen the tackle, but if the victim went past the horizontal and is rammed into the ground then 5 weeks with mitigation is correct. Are the commentators here saying that is not the case and that there is racial bias? In terms of danger a tip tackle is worse than an accidental/poor tackle technique shoulder to the head.

      B
      Bob Marler 703 days ago

      Yup. That’s what we’re saying. His ban was more severe because of his race, not logic.


      A shoulder into a persons head or temple is just as career ending. Ever been concussed? Yet farrel got 3 weeks. With aggravation (prior incidents) completely ignored.


      Barret, for example, will probably not even get cited for his high shot on Marx. Who was on the ground. Whatever ever happened to not being able to play someone on the ground?


      But here’s the kicker. You see initially the argument was that tier 2 teams, and Pacific Island teams were treated more harshly. NZ is a pacific island team - but the leniency that will be shown towards Barret will only helps us conclude that it is actually a race thing.

      C
      CC 704 days ago

      He didn't go past the horizontal and was dropped, not driven, from just below shoulder height, onto his back.

      Farrells deliberate shoulder to the head was way more dangerous than Moalas tackle.


      Moala has a clean record, Farrell has a long history of dangerous tackles.


      Farrell denied he deserved a red card, Moala admitted guilty, and apologised.


      Moala got a longer suspension than Farrell.

      V
      Vincent 704 days ago

      Both could be career ending life changing.

      Farrell had form and no mitigation. It was stated he was of good character! What does that mean and how was it measured???

      It is a statement, given Farrell s previous ban, which opens the judicial com. to accusations of bias!!!

      D
      DH 704 days ago

      Oh yeah, remember that guy who broke his neck in a tip tackle, that was terrible. No, you don't remember that guy. He doesn't exist, it never happened. Serious neck injuries happen in the scrum. Serious head injuries happen when people with poor technique tackle too high.

      B
      BE 704 days ago

      From what I saw of tackle it wasn't a deliberate tip he simply had too much power and I don't think player came down on his head and he didn't "drive" him into the ground. Weird five match ban when a deliberate shoulder to head for repeat offender gets less. No consistency

      L
      LW 704 days ago

      Racists

      D
      DH 704 days ago

      I think that's pretty much the only way to describe it, unfortunately.

      D
      Damian 704 days ago

      Racist much!

      C
      Clarence 704 days ago

      What a surprise! Shame on you World Rugby and the northern hemisphere losers!!!

      Load More Comments

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Long Reads

      Comments on RugbyPass

      LONG READ
      LONG READ Mick Cleary: 'The MCG gave us the occasion we craved. It gave us memories. And that is priceless.' Mick Cleary: 'The MCG gave us the occasion we craved. It gave us memories. And that is priceless.'