Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby to work in “active partnership” with unions to raise investment and standards

(L-R) Rachel Malcolm (Scotland), Saki Minami (Japan), Siwan Lillicrap (Wales), Shannon Perry (Australia), Gaelle Hermet (France), Sarah Hunter (England), Kennedy Simon (New Zealand), Sereima Leweniqila (Fiji), Kate Zackary (USA), Nolusindiso Booi (South Africa), Sophie de Goede (Canada) and Elisa Giordano (Italy) pose in front of a mural specially created for the tournament during the Rugby World Cup 2021 Captains' Photocall at Eden Park on 2 October, 2022 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

World Rugby has committed to taking a more proactive approach to generating investment to support the growth of the women’s game as it bids to close the competition gap in the next decade.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Tuesday, the governing body launched the Accelerate framework, a new targeted investment approach that it hopes will “supercharge the development of women’s rugby on and off the field”.

Focusing initially on 20 unions capable of qualifying for WXV and Rugby World Cup 2025, World Rugby’s aim is to develop partnerships within those nations to help drive investment and raise standards in the ten years leading up to RWC 2033 in the USA.

A pilot project in Australia has already generated AU$2 million in government funding and enabled the Rugby World Cup 2027 and 2029 hosts to increase support for its Super W competition and offer 35 part-time contracts to Wallaroos players.

“Accelerate is a plan that increases our investment and the way we work in active partnership with up to 20 unions,” World Rugby Chief of Women’s Rugby Sally Horrox said at SportsPro Live 2023.

“That’s not just about the pinnacle of the game because what we believe we need to do is build from that base.

“Because we haven’t got the depth of talent, we haven’t got the pathways, we haven’t got the domestic competitions, cross-border competitions globally, that will allow us to thrive as a sport.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We believe that we need to work with our union partners to increase collective investment. That’s government, that’s brands, that’s media partners, that’s us and resources, which means people on the ground to fast-track the development of the sport in those countries.”

Key to the success of the Accelerate programme, Horrox says, will be “specifically identifying the things that are going to make the most difference” in each of the participating unions.

Referencing the initial pilot programme, Horrox added: “Raising standards in the Super W league, making sure that there are full-time coaches, strength and conditioning staff, physiotherapists, we are actively engaged in making that happen in Australia.

“We will match-fund appointments, we will take some risk and reward on that on the ground. We will put workforce out into these countries.

ADVERTISEMENT

“What we can’t be is a substitute for local investment, our partners have to want to do it with us. But it’s about [identifying] what are the three transformational initiatives in each country that are going to make the difference, and then we can get behind them and we plan them.”

Following on from the pilot project in Australia, USA Rugby has been offered support as the country builds towards hosting the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games as well as the Rugby World Cup in 2031 and 2033.

World Rugby will then begin to work with other unions it has identified in the build-up to RWC 2025 in England.

Participating nations will need to show a willingness to generate and match investment, while reaching minimum standards in terms of leadership and governance.

Although 20 have been identified ahead of the programme’s launch, that number will remain “quite fluid” as Horrox acknowledges the governing body cannot ignore member unions outside of that initial group.

“We’ve got to be strategic and targeted, so it is about casting the net pretty widely,” World Rugby CEO Alan Gilpin said.

“Do we want the women’s game, in terms of international competitiveness in ten years’ time, to mirror the men’s game? No, we want more depth.

“If we’re going to create that competitive depth, we’ve got to give all those nations a pathway to that.

“So, the regional competitions very clearly having a pathway to WXV, which they have, and then once you’re in WXV in that year in a pool of six, you’re playing against the right type of opposition.

“We should start to address those blowout results because actually what the teams need is to play the teams right around them in terms of capability, that’s how we’re going to see improvement.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 43 minutes ago
South Africa will beat England at a canter

You forget that this was the 3rd Test between the AB's and the English this year. They were prepared and they knew how to keep NZ quiet. The Boks is not NZ.


The Boks is a whole other level. You overestimate England and underestimate the Boks. Clearly you haven't really looked at the teams. Besides the Irish games earlier this year, the Boks have mainly used experimental sides, even against the AB's.


Now they have chosen their best team available. They have targeted this game. The Boks mean business. Man for man, this Bok team is better. In strategy and player abilities there is no comparison and they are outmatched.


There isn't just monster strength, but unreal speed. In broken play there is currently no better team as well as defensively, not to even talk about the attacking threat, both from front and the back.


I'd say read between the lines, see what everyone is seeing, but clearly you are wearing blinders and is also putting too much emphasis on an AB's team the Boks beat twice this year, the same AB's that beaten England 3 times this year.


When Rassie gets serious, the players become machines. There is no stopping them. That bench is loaded with players that is fast, strong and have exceptional skills. This is a team not many teams will face before the 2027 WC, because the Boks doesn't use their best between WC's in one game. All experimental.


You will be proven wrong on Saturday and then you will wonder how you could have been so wrong. This Bok team means serious business. They came to conquer and not just by a close score. They want to demolish and they will. This England team at most is a 60 min team. Against the Boks that just won't cut it

14 Go to comments
H
Hellhound 59 minutes ago
South Africa will beat England at a canter

Not bizarre, but needed. Everyone usually lifts their game against the Boks. Now instead of facing reality, they prefer to live in the past and look hopefully toward the score of the WC semi, hoping they can recreate that result and by some miracle snatch a victory.


It's better than the alternative knowing what is going to happen. Especially looking at the experimental squads the Boks put up against the Wallabies in the RC, not using their best team. That same Wallabies beat them last week.


Now the Boks isn't using an experimental squad. They put out as close to the strongest team the Boks have available at the moment. That must scare the pants off of them. If an experimental squad can destroy the Wallabies, what would the strongest team be able to do to the English?


Instead of sinking into dispear, they prefer to hope that their players can match the Boks. Even though they know what is coming. The English are scared and they won't show it.


Now imagine how Wales must feel knowing they are up next weekend? They don't even have the dubious record of at least close losses like the English. It's a complete nightmare for these 2 countries and rightly so.


The Boks usually take the pedal of the medal post WC's, but not this Bok team. They are better than the WC winning Boks of both '19 and '23. They are stronger up front. They are faster at the back. They can hit front and back. In broken play they are the most dangerous team. They have the best defence and attack also scoring the most tries.


In a way I feel sorry for both the English and Wales. Only those with blinders on expects a close game. Looking at both teams man to man, strategy to strategy, play to play, they are so outmatched it would be a joke if it wasn't so serious. We need the NH to be strong and we need the gap to become closer in rugby so the game stay exciting because runaway scores sometimes is fun, but it doesn't bring as much joy as a close game won.

14 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING New scrumhalf rule among 4 global Law trials as others shot down New scrumhalf rule among 4 global Law trials as others shot down
Search