Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

WRU and regions issue joint statement in bid to ease fears

A general view of the stadium during the United Rugby Championship match between the Scarlets and Dragons at Parc y Scarlets on April 16, 2022 in Llanelli, Wales. (Photo by Athena Pictures/Getty Images)

The WRU and the regions have issued a joint statement through the Professional Rugby Board (PRB) in an attempt to ease fears around the leaking of a report that recommended that one region is cut.

ADVERTISEMENT

The findings of the Oakwell Sports Advisory report were published in the Times this week and caused huge consternation in Welsh rugby circles.

The report suggests that the Ospreys or the Dragons are at the front of the queue for the chop.

Video Spacer

Alex Lozowski – Pigs Head Initiation’s, Learning from Andy Goode & Playing For Chelsea FC | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 32

Video Spacer

Alex Lozowski – Pigs Head Initiation’s, Learning from Andy Goode & Playing For Chelsea FC | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 32

Now the PRB have bid to quell fears with a longwinded statement in which it says it would be ‘counterproductive to discuss potential scenarios publicly at this time.’

The statement reads:

“The PRB remains committed to this purpose as well as meeting the many challenges the last two years have presented to the sports sector.

“We would like to reassure supporters, players, management and other staff, partners, sponsors, investors and all those with a vested and passionate interest in the professional game in Wales that the PRB is the right place to secure the future of the game in Wales.

“The game would not exist without the efforts and commitment of these people and the PRB’s members are all absolutely aware of their responsibilities to all of these individuals. Every member of the PRB remains committed to this process and delivering what is best for Welsh rugby. Discussions are ongoing and no conclusions have been reached at this time.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The statement points out that seeking outside opinion is a key part of their strategic planning.

“It has proved beneficial since the inception of the PRB to seek outside opinions on a number of issues. These opinions, such as those contained in the Oakwell report as well as other external reports, bring the dual benefits of objectivity and fresh thinking to a wide range of PRB discussions.”

It also makes it clear that no decision has yet been made on the matter.

“Ultimately, it is for the members of the PRB to formulate a strategy based on all available information and relevant, sourced and commissioned subject matter expertise. This strategy building is ongoing and the Oakwell report has been an informative part of that process.

Related

“The PRB will present its strategy to the WRU Board in due course. A high level of interest in this subject is entirely understandable given the strength of feeling and passion that is fundamental to Welsh rugby. We are committed to sharing this strategy at the earliest appropriate opportunity but feel it would be counterproductive to discuss potential scenarios publicly at this time.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The PRB collectively represents the professional game, is appointed to work in the best interests of the professional game and has the breadth of knowledge, expertise and business acumen to make the right decisions to safeguard its future.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
AllyOz 19 hours ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

I will preface this comment by saying that I hope Joe Schmidt continues for as long as he can as I think he has done a tremendous job to date. He has, in some ways, made the job a little harder for himself by initially relying on domestic based players and never really going over the top with OS based players even when he relaxed his policy a little more. I really enjoy how the team are playing at the moment.


I think Les Kiss, because (1) he has a bit more international experience, (2) has previously coached with Schmidt and in the same setup as Schmidt, might provide the smoothest transition, though I am not sure that this necessarily needs to be the case.


I would say one thing though about OS versus local coaches. I have a preference for local coaches but not for the reason that people might suppose (certainly not for the reason OJohn will have opined - I haven't read all the way down but I think I can guess it).


Australia has produced coaches of international standing who have won World Cups and major trophies. Bob Dwyer, Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones. I would add John Connolly - though he never got the international success he was highly successful with Queensland against quality NZ opposition and I think you could argue, never really got the run at international level that others did (OJohn might agree with that bit). Some of those are controversial but they all achieved high level results. You can add to that a number of assistants who worked OS at a high level.


But what the lack of a clear Australian coach suggests to me is that we are no longer producing coaches of international quality through our systems. We have had some overseas based coaches in our system like Thorn and Wessels and Cron (though I would suggest Thorn was a unique case who played for Australia in one code and NZ in the other and saw himself as a both a NZer and a Queenslander having arrived here at around age 12). Cron was developed in the Australian system anyway, so I don't have a problem with where he was born.


But my point is that we used to have systems in Australia that produced world class coaches. The systems developed by Dick Marks, which adopted and adapted some of the best coaching training approaches at the time from around the world (Wales particularly) but focussed on training Australian coaches with the best available methods, in my mind (as someone who grew up and began coaching late in that era) was a key part of what produced the highly skilled players that we produced at the time and also that produced those world class coaches. I think it was slipping already by the time I did my Level II certificate in 2002 and I think Eddie Jones influence and the priorities of the executive, particularly John O'Neill, might have been the beginning of the end. But if we have good coaching development programmes at school and junior level that will feed through to representative level then we will have


I think this is the missing ingredient that both ourselves and, ironically, Wales (who gave us the bones of our coaching system that became world leading), is a poor coaching development system. Fix that and you start getting players developing basic skills better and earlier in their careers and this feeds through all the way through the system and it also means that, when coaching positions at all levels come up, there are people of quality to fill them, who feed through the system all the way to the top. We could be exporting more coaches to Japan and England and France and the UK and the USA, as we have done a bit in the past.


A lack of a third tier between SR and Club rugby might block this a little - but I am not sure that this alone is the reason - it does give people some opportunity though to be noticed and play a key role in developing that next generation of players coming through. And we have never been able to make the cost sustainable.


I don't think it matters that we have an OS coach as our head coach at the moment but I think it does tell us something about overall rugby ecosystem that, when a coaching appointment comes up, we don't have 3 or 4 high quality options ready to take over. The failure of our coaching development pathway is a key missing ingredient for me and one of the reasons our systems are failing.

131 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING POTM Ben Curry peeved at post-match question POTM Ben Curry peeved at post-match question
Search