Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

WXV 1 : cet inquiétant record que la France veut éviter

XV de France féminin

La stat à garder en tête en prévision du prochain match de l’équipe de France féminine face aux Etats-Unis le samedi 5 octobre : la dernière fois que la France a perdu quatre tests consécutifs, c’était sur les saisons 1997-98.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pour l’heure, le XV de France féminin a enquillé trois défaites de rang : 21-42 contre l’Angleterre le 27 avril, 38-19 contre l’Angleterre le 7 septembre, puis 46-24 contre le Canada le 29 septembre.

En 1997-1998, la France avait enchaîné en tout cinq défaites de rang : par deux fois face à l’Angleterre (10-15 le 4 avril 1997, puis 5-18 le 1er février 1998), contre l’Espagne (8-25 le 6 avril 1997), contre l’Ecosse (19-3 le 21 février 1998) et enfin contre l’Italie (13-11 le 14 mars 1998).

Cette triste série avait pris fin en réussissant à battre une équipe bien, bien plus faible, le Kazakhstan (21-6, le 2 mai 1998).

L’importance du classement mondial pour Angleterre 2025

Encore une défaite contre les Etats-Unis le 5 octobre, voire une cinquième de suite contre la Nouvelle-Zélande le 12 octobre et ce record sera égalé.

Rencontre
WXV 1
USA Womens
14 - 22
Temps complet
France Womens
Toutes les stats et les données

La grosse différence est qu’à l’époque (1997-1998) le classement mondial n’existait pas ; il n’a été mis en place qu’en février 2016 pour les filles. Cette année, le tirage au sort pour la Coupe du Monde de Rugby féminin 2025 se basera justement sur le classement mondial à l’issue du WXV.

Un mauvais positionnement et la France risquerait de ne pas avoir un tirage au sort favorable. A moins d’un an de l’évènement et avec encore deux matchs à jouer avant le tirage au sort, la situation peut sembler inquiétante.

Une prise de conscience

« Il y a une prise de conscience », confirme la trois-quarts centre Nassira Kondé (25 ans, 12 sélections), sans pour autant montrer de signes d’inquiétude. « On sait où on en est, ce n’est pas pour autant qu’on n’y croit pas. On a un an pour peaufiner ça. On est alertées sur certains points mais ce n’est pas pour autant qu’on n’y croit pas. »

Dans ce contexte, le match contre les Etats-Unis, qui ont réussi à faire douter l’Angleterre – n°1 mondial – jusqu’au dernier quart d’heure, sera crucial.

ADVERTISEMENT

Face à face

1 dernières réunions

Victoires
0
Nuls
0
Victoires
1
Moyenne de points marqués
14
22
Le premier essai gagne
100%
L'équipe recevante gagne
0%

« C’est une équipe qui, comme le Canada, est assez massive », constate Émeline Gros (29 ans, 35 sélections). « On va être attendues et elles ont bien tenu contre les Anglaises. On sait que ça va être un gros match mais on se focalise plutôt sur nous et ce qu’on va mettre en place pour toucher leurs points faibles, aller scorer pour gagner.

« Au-delà de faire mieux que l’an dernier, on veut monter au ranking mondial. Nous sommes compétitrices et on veut gagner chaque match. Le but est de se focaliser sur les USA avant de penser à la Nouvelle-Zélande. »

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search